Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:39:03.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of crowding and diet on the development and survival of the ladybird Brumoides suturalis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) reared on two aphid species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

Mahadev Bista ,
Geetanjali Mishra  and
Omkar
Mahadev Bista
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Ladybird Research Laboratory, University of Lucknow, Lucknow226 007, India
Geetanjali Mishra
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Ladybird Research Laboratory, University of Lucknow, Lucknow226 007, India
Omkar*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Ladybird Research Laboratory, University of Lucknow, Lucknow226 007, India
*
*E-mail: omkaar55@hotmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The influence of solitary versus group rearing on the development and survival of the three-striped ladybird beetle Brumoides suturalis (Fabricius) was studied using two aphid species, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and Aphis gossypii Glover, as diet. Rearing pattern (solitary or group) had no significant influence on the success of rearing, but prey species did. While immature stages developed faster on A. pisum, the survival of early instars was higher on A. gossypii. Diet had no effect on pupal survival.

Keywords

solitary rearinggroup rearingcrowding, mortality life tableAphis gossypiiAcyrthosiphon pisum
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 64 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Applebaum, S. W. and Heifetz, Y. (1999) Density-dependent physiological phase in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 44, 317–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackman, B. L. (1967) The effect of different aphid foods on Adalia bipunctata L. and Coccinella septempunctata L. Annals of Applied Biology 59, 207–219.Google Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. (1970) Quality and availability of food for a sycamore aphid population, pp. 271–287. In Animal Population in Relation to their Food Resources (edited by Watson, A.). Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. (2000) Insect Predator–Prey Dynamics: Ladybird Beetles and Biological Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 257 pp.Google Scholar
Fantinou, A. A., Perdikis, D. C. and Stamogiannis, N. (2008) Effect of larval crowding on the life history traits of Sesamia nonagrioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). European Journal of Entomology 105, 625–630.Google Scholar
Francis, F., Haubruge, E. and Gasper, C. (2000) Influence of host plant on specialist/generalist aphids on the development of Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). European Journal of Entomology 97, 481–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautam, R. D. (1988) Possible utilization of predators in biocontrol of white tailed mealybug, Ferrisia virgata (Pseudococcidae: Homoptera). In Proceedings of the National Symposium on Integrated Pest Control: Progress and Perspectives, Trivandrum, India. 9, 196..Google Scholar
Gautam, R. D. (1990) Mass multiplication technique of the coccinellids predator, the ladybird beetle (Brumoides suturalis). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 60, 747–750.Google Scholar
Gibbs, M., Lace, L. A., Jones, M. J. and Moore, A. J. (2004) Intraspecific competition in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria: effect of rearing density and gender on larval life history. Journal of Insect Science 4, 16. Available at:http://www.insectscience.org/4.16 [online].Google Scholar
Hemptinne, J. L., Gaudin, M., Dixon, A. F. G. and Lognay, G. (2000) Social feeding in ladybirds: adaptive significance and mechanism. Chemoecology 10, 149–152.Google Scholar
Hodek, I. (1956) The influence of Aphis sambuci L. as prey of the ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata L. Vestnik Ceskoslovenske Spolecnosti Zoologicke 20, 62–74(in Czech, English summary).Google Scholar
Hodek, I. and Honek, A. (1996) Ecology of Coccinellidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London. 464 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, A. P. (1942) Bionomics of some Coccinellidae, predaceous on aphids and coccids in North India. Indian Journal of Entomology 4, 49–66.Google Scholar
Morris, R. E. and Miller, C. A. (1954) The development of life-tables for the spruce budworm. Canadian Journal of Zoology 32, 283–301.Google Scholar
Nahrung, H. F., Dunstan, P. K. and Allen, G. R. (2001) Larval gregariousness and neonate establishment of the eucalypt feeding beetle Chrysophtharta agricola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Paropsini). Oikos 94, 358–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, E. H. and Rosenheim, J. A. (2006) Encounters between aphids and their predators: the relative frequencies of disturbance and consumption. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 118, 211–219.Google Scholar
Omkar, and Afaq, U. (2009) Intraspecific competition in the Parthenium beetle Zygogramma bicolorata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): effect of larval crowding on life-history traits. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 29, 40–47.Google Scholar
Omkar, , Kumar, G. and Sahu, J. (2009) Performance of a predatory ladybird beetle, Anegleis cardoni (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on three aphid species. European Journal of Entomology 106, 565–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omkar, and Pathak, S. (2009) Crowding affects the life attributes of an aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta. Bulletin of Insectology 62, 35–40.Google Scholar
Omkar, and Pervez, A. (2004) Predaceous coccinellids in India: predator–prey catalogue. Oriental Insects 38, 27–61.Google Scholar
Prout, T. and McChesney, F. (1985) Competition among immatures affects their adult fertility: population dynamics. The American Naturalist 126, 521–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulliam, H. R. and Caraco, T. (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size?, pp. 122–147. In Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (edited by Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Putman, R. J. (1977) The dynamics of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala within carrion. Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 853–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savridou, N. and Bell, C. H. (1994) The effect of larval density, photoperiod and food change on the development of Gnatocerus cornutus (F.) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 30, 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, D. E. (1990) Effects of larval density in Ambystoma opacum: an experiment in large-scale field enclosures. Ecology 71, 296–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, M. S. J. and Blaney, W. M. (1986) Effects of rearing density on development and feeding behaviour in larvae of Spodoptera exempta. Journal of Insect Physiology 32, 1043–1053.Google Scholar
Srivastava, S. and Omkar, (2004) Fertility and mortality life tables of an aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus. Entomon 29, 101–110.Google Scholar
Sugiura, K. and Takada, H. (1998) Suitability of seven aphid species as a prey of Cheilomenes sexmaculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 42, 7–14.Google Scholar
Tammaru, T., Ruohomaki, K. and Montola, M. (2000) Crowding-induced plasticity in Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): weak evidence of specific modifications in reaction. Oikos 90, 171–181.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. J. and Alcock, J. (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 564 pp.Google Scholar
Tschinkel, W., Willson, C. and Bern, H. A. (1967) Sex pheromone of the mealworm beetle (Tenebrio molitor). Journal of Experimental Biology 164, 81–86.Google Scholar
Wiklund, C. and Forsberg, J. (1991) Sexual size dimorphism in relation to female polygamy and protandry in butterflies: a comparative study of Swedish Pieridae and Satyridae. Oikos 60, 373–381.Google Scholar