Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:21:11.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a User- Friendly Future: The Impact of Information Technology within Primary Health Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

John D. Harvey
John D. Harvey
Affiliation:
West Suffolk Health Authority
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The use of computers in primary care in the United Kingdom has developed without coordination. The present situation is described. The proposal is that policies for improving primary care will be enhanced by appropriate application of information technology. Benefits and obstacles are identified; practical proposals for effective development are listed.

Type
Special Section: Technology in Primary Care and Ambulatory Settings
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 79 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Coates, A. Classification systems. In Sheldon, M. & Stoddard, N. (eds.), Trends in genera! practice computing. London: Royal College of General Practitioners, 1985, 194–98.Google Scholar
2.Cumming, G. Towards a policy for computing. In A time for decision? Computing policy and practice in the NHS. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1982, 83–92.Google Scholar
3.Department of Health and Social Security. Steering Group on Health Services Information. Reports to secretary of state. London: HMSO, 1984.Google Scholar
4.Department of Health and Social Security. General practice computing. Evaluation of the “Micros for GP's” scheme: Final report. London: HMSO, 1985.Google Scholar
5.Department of Health and Social Security. Neighbourhood nursing –A focus for care. London: HMSO, 1986.Google Scholar
6.Department of Health and Social Security. Promoting better hea!tk White paper on primary health care (Command 249). London: HMSO, 1987.Google Scholar
7.Department of Health and Social Security. District health authority use of family practitioner committee patient registration data. A consultation document. London: DHSS, 1987.Google Scholar
8.Department of Health and Social Security. Health and personal social services statistics 1986. London: HMSO, 1986.Google Scholar
9.Difford, F.Future trends in general practice computing. Journal of Royal College of General Practitioners, 1987, 37, 434–5.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Exeter University Department of General Practice. Micros in practice. Report of an appraisal of GP microcomputer systems. London: HMSO, 1986.Google Scholar
11.Fitter, M. J., Garber, J. R., Herzmark, G. A., Robinson, D., & Jones, R. V. H.Making GP computers effective. British Journal of Healthcare Computing, 1986, 3, 33–35.Google Scholar
12.Goldberg, B., & Savill, A.Comcare on hand-held. British Journal of Healthcare Computing, 1987, 4, 23–25.Google Scholar
13.Herbert, S. I. A review of computer policy and practice. In A time for decision? Computing policy and practice in the NHS. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1982, 5–54.Google Scholar
14.Kaplan, B.The medical computing “lag”: Perceptions of barriers to the application of computers to medicine. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1987, 3, 123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Knox, E. G. (ed). Health care information. Report of a Joint Working Group of the Korner Committee on Health Services Information and the Faculty of Community Medicine. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1987.Google Scholar
16.NHS Information Technology Branch. Survey of computerised general practices. London: DHSS, 1987.Google Scholar
17.Ritchie, L. D.Computers in primary care. London: William Heinemann Medical Books, Ltd., 1984.Google Scholar
18.Sheldon, M. Will computers change general practice? In Sheldon, M. & Stoddart, N. (eds.), Trends in general practice computing. London: Royal College of General Practitioners, 1985, 227–31.Google Scholar
19.Suffolk Family Practitioner Committee. Strategic plan 1987–1997. Consultative document. Ipswich: Suffolk F.P.C., 10 1987.Google Scholar
20.Sullivan, R. J.Medical record and index systems for community practice. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1979.Google Scholar
21.Vuori, H. Privacy, confidentiality and automated health information systems. Journal of Medical Ethics, 1977, 3, 174–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. Targets for health for all. Copenhagen: WHO, 1985.Google Scholar
23.WONCA & WHO. International classification of primary care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar