1. Asua Batarrita, J. Priorización de necesidades de evaluación en el País Vasco. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Salud Carlos III; 1999.
2. Bernal-Delgado, E, Peiró, S, Sotoca, R. Prioridades de investigación en servicios sanitarios en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Una aproximación por consenso de expertos. Gac Sanit. 2006;20:287–294.
3. Black, N. A national strategy for research and development: Lessons from England. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:485–505.
4. Brown, P, Brunnhuber, K, Chalkidou, K, et al. How to formulate research recommendations. BMJ. 2006;333:804–806.
5. Brown, K, Dyas, J, Chahal, P, et al. Discovering the research priorities of people with diabetes in a multicultural community: A focus group study. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:206–213.
6. Buxton, M, Hanney, S. How can payback from health services research be assessed? J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996;1:35–43.
7. Caron-Flinterman, JF, Broerse, JE, Teerling, J, Bunders, JF. Patients’ priorities concerning health research: The case of asthma and COPD research in the Netherlands. Health Expect. 2005;8:253–263.
8. Carson, N, Ansari, Z, Hart, W. Priority setting in public health and health services research. Aust Health Rev. 2000;23:46–57.
9. Claxton, K, Ginnelly, L, Sculpher, M, Philips, Z, Palmer, S. A pilot study on the use of decision theory and value of information analysis as part of the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1–103.
10. Dault, M, Lomas, J, Barer, M, on behalf of the Listening for Direction II partners. Listening for direction II. National consultation on health services and policy issues for 2004–2007. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation and Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; 2004.
11. Department of Health. Best research for best health: A new national health research strategy. The NHS contribution to health research in England. London: HMSO; 2006.
12. Department of Health. Research for health. London: HMSO; 1992.
13. Donaldson, MS, Sox, HC, eds. Setting priorities for health technology assessment: A model process. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
14. Eden, J, Wheatley, B, McNeil, B, Sox, H, eds. Knowing what works in health care. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2008.
15. Evidence-Based Care Resource Group. Evidence-based care: 1. Setting priorities: How important is this problem? Can Med Assoc J. 1994;150:1249–1254.
16. Fleurence, RL, Torgerson, DJ. Setting priorities for research. Health Policy. 2004;69:1–10.
17. Fulop, N, Allen, P, Clarke, A, Black, N. From health technology assessment to research on the organisation and delivery of health services: Addressing the balance. Health Policy. 2003;63:155–165.
18. Gross, CP, Anderson, GF, Powe, NR. The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1881–1887.
19. Hanney, S, Mugford, M, Grant, J, Buxton, M. Assessing the benefits of health research: Lessons from research into the use of antenatal corticosteroids for the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:937–947.
20. Henshall, C, Oortwijn, W, Stevens, A, Granados, A, Banta, D. Priority setting for health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:144–185.
21. Institute of Medicine. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2009.
22. Jones, R, Lamont, T, Haines, A. Setting priorities for research and development in the NHS: A case study on the interface between primary and secondary care. BMJ. 1995;311:1076–1080.
23. Lionis, C, Stoffers, HE, Hummers-Pradier, , et al. Setting priorities and identifying barriers for general practice research in Europe. Results from an EGPRW meeting. Fam Pract. 2004;21:587–593.
24. Meneu, R. Variabilidad de las decisiones médicas y su repercusión sobre las poblaciones. Barcelona: Masson; 2002.
25. Michaud, CM, Murray, CJ, Bloom, BR. Burden of disease: Implications for future research. JAMA. 2001;285:535–539.
26. Moreno-Casbas, T, Martin-Arribas, C, Orts-Cortes, I, Comet-Cortes, P, Investen-ISCIII Co-ordination and Development of Nursing Research Centre. Identification of priorities for nursing research in Spain: A Delphi study. J Adv Nurs. 2001;35:857–863.
27. Oortwijn, WJ, Vondeling, H, van Barneveld, T, van Vugt, C, Bouter, LM. Priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: Principles and practice. Health Policy. 2002;62:227–242.
28. Phelps, CE, Parente, ST. Priority setting in medical technology and medical practice assessment. Med Care. 1990;28:703–723.
30. Streiner, DL, Norman, GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
32. Tunis, SR, Stryer, DB, Clancy, CM. Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003;290:1624–1632.
33. Welfare, MR, Colligan, J, Molyneux, S, Pearson, P, Barton, JR. The identification of topics for research that are important to people with ulcerative colitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:939–944.
34. Zerhouni, EA. US biomedical research: Basic, translational, and clinical sciences. JAMA. 2005;294:1352–1358.