Skip to main content Accessibility help

Rationing Medical Technology: Hospital Decision Making in the United States and England

  • Ann Lennarson Greer (a1)


This paper analyzes medical technology decision making in the United States and England in terms of the appropriateness of different decision-making models to the organization and delivery of medical care, and to the rationing of technology among and within hospitals. It examines the effect on the American hospital of prospective payment programs from the perspective of organizational structure and decision making. The strategies of central control and specification which characterize these programs are contrasted with decision-making procedures in the English National Health Service, which have emphasized decentralization, delegation, and consensus. The analysis suggests that decentralized models of decision making are more supportive of essential elements of medical care including doctor-patient trust and professional responsibility and are more able to achieve rationing decisions which are compatible with professional and consumer preferences.



Hide All
1.Aaron, H. J., & Schwartz, W. B.The painful prescription: Rationing hospital care. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, 1984.
2.Becker, H. S., Geer, B., Hughes, E. C., & Strauss, A. L.Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1961.
3.Berenson, R. A.Capitation and conflict of interest. Health Affairs, 1986, 5, 141146.
4.Bull, M. J. Implementation of DRG prospective reimbursement: Health care providers' response. Ph.D. Dissertation, Urban Social Institutions Ph.D. Program University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 1986.
5.Child, J., & Kieser, A. Organization and managerial roles in British and West German companies: An examination of the culture-free thesis. In Lammers, C. J. & Hick-son, D. J. (eds.) Organizations alike and unlike: Inter-institutional studies in the sociology of organizations. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979, 251271.
6.Clark, P. Culture context as a determinant of organizational rationality: A comparison of the tobacco industries in Britain and France. In Lammers, C. J. & Hickson, D. J. (eds.) Organizations alike and unlike: Inter-institutional studies in the sociology of organizations. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979, 251271.
7.Department of Health and Social Security. Patients first. ISBN 0 11 320720 4; London: HMSO, 1979.
8.Dill, W. R. Business organizations. In March, J. G. (ed.) Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965, 1087.
9.Earickson, R.The spatial behavior of hospital patients: A behavioral approach to spatial interaction in metropolitan Chicago. University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Paper No. 124, 1970.
10.Elling, R. The hospital support game in urban center. In Freidson, E., The hospital in modern society. New York: The Free Press, 1963.
11.Flexner, A.Is social work a profession? Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Correction, 1915, 576581.
12.Fox, R.Experiment perilous. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1959.
13.Fox, R. Medical evolution. In Essays in medical sociology. New York: John Wiley, 1979.
14.Freidson, E.Professional dominance: The social structure of medical care. Chicago: Aldine, 1970, 199206.
15.Freidson, E.Profession of medicine: A study in the sociology applied knowledge. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.
16.Gallagher, E. B.The doctor-patient relationship. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976. DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 78183.
17.Ginzberg, E.The limits of reform: The search for realism. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
18.Goode, W. J.Encroachment, charlatanism, and the emerging professions: Psychology, sociology and medicine. American Sociological Review, 1960, 25, 902914.
19.Greer, A. L.Adoption of medical technology: The hospital's three decision systems. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1985, 1, 669680.
20.Greer, A. L. Medical conservatism and technological acquisitiveness: The paradox of hospital technology adoptions. In Roth, J. & Ruzak, S. (eds.) Research in the sociology of health care, vol. 4.: The Adoption and social consequences of medical technologies. Greenwich, CT, 1986, 185235.
21.Greer, A. L.Medical technology and professional dominance theory. Social Science and Medicine, 1984, 18, 809817.
22.Greer, S. Professional self-regulation in the public interest: The intellectual politics of PSRO. In Greer, S. (ed.) Conference on professional self-regulation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, DHEW Publications No. (HRA) 77–621, 95108.
23.Greer, S.Social organization. New York: Random House, 1955, 14.
24.Grusky, O., & Miller, G. A.The sociology of organizations: Basic studies. New York: Basic Books, 1981.
25.Jaco, E. G. (ed.). Patients, physicians and illness: A sourcebook in behavioral science and medicine. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1958.
26.Jennet, B.High technology medicine: Benefits and burdens, new ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
27.Levitt, R., & Wall, A.The reorganized national health service, 3rd edition. Dover, NH: Croom Helm, 1984.
28.Mechanic, D.Future issues in health care. New York: Free Press, 1979.
29.Mechanic, D.The growth of bureaucratic medicine: An inquiry into the dynamics of patient behavior and the organization of medical care. New York: Free Press, 1976.
30.Parsons, T. Reflections on the problem of psychosomatic relationships in health and illness; In Social structure and personality. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1964, 112126, 255–358.
31.Parsons, T. Illness and the role of the physician: A sociological perspective. In Kluckhohn, C., Murray, H. A., & Schneider, D. M. (eds.) Personality in nature, society and culture. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1953.
32.Perrow, C. Goals and power structures: A historical case study. In Freidson, E. (ed.) The hospital in modern society. New York: The Free Press, 1963.
33.Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H.In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best run companies, New York: Harper and Row, 1982.
34.Schulz, R., & Harrison, S.Consensus management in the British National Health Service. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly: Health and Society, 1984, 62, 657680.
35.Stevens, R. Comparisons in health care: Britain as contrast to the United States. In Mechanic, D. (ed.) Handbook of health, health care, and the health professions. New York: The Free Press, 1983, 281304.
36.Stinchcomb, A.Bureaucratic and craft administration of production. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1959, 4, 168187.
37.Stocking, B.Expensive medical techniques. Report of the Council for Science and Society. London: Calvert's Press, 1982, 18.
38.Taylor, F. W.Scientific management. Copyright 1911 by Taylor, F. W.; New York: Harper and Row, 1947.
39.Thomas, L.The youngest science: Notes of a medicine-watcher. New York: Viking Press, 1983.

Rationing Medical Technology: Hospital Decision Making in the United States and England

  • Ann Lennarson Greer (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed