Ganann, R, Ciliska, D, Thomas, H. Expediting systematic reviews: Methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci. 2010;5:56.
Gough, D, Thomas, J, Oliver, S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev. 2012;1:28.
Khangura, S, Konnyu, K, Cushman, R, Grimshaw, J, Moher, D. Evidence summaries: The evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:10.
Harker, J, Kleijnen, J. What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012;10:397–410.
Thigpen, S, Puddy, RW, Singer, HH, Hall, DM. Moving knowledge into action: Developing the rapid synthesis and translation process within the interactive systems framework. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:285–294.
Hailey, D, Corabian, P, Harstall, C, Schneider, W. The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:651–656.
INAHTA (International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment). About INAHTA. Stockholm (Sweden): INAHTA; 2012. http://www.inahta.net/ (accessed June 28, 2012).
Drummond, MF, Schwartz, JS, Jonsson, B, et al.
Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:244–258.
Menon, D, Stafinski, T. Health technology assessment in Canada: 20 years strong?
Value Health. 2009;12(Suppl 2):S14–19.
Hailey, D. A preliminary survey on the influence of rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:415–418.
Gerhardus, A, Dintsios, CM. The impact of HTA reports on health policy: A systematic review. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2005;1:Doc02.
Abrami, PC, Borokhovski, E, Bernard, RM, et al.
Issues in conducting and disseminating brief reviews of evidence. Evid Policy. 2010;6:371–389.
Wright, RW, Brand, RA, Dunn, W, Spindler, KP. How to write a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;455:23–29.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI). PRISMA-P: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols. Ottawa: OHRI; 2012. http://www.kscanada.ca/docs/PRISMA-P.pdf (accessed October 2, 2012).
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. York (UK): University of York. 2012. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (accessed March 1, 2012).
Tricco, AC, Tetzlaff, J, Moher, D. The art and science of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:11–20.
Higgins, JPT, Green, S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed August 1, 2012).
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50: A guideline developer's handbook. Revised edition. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2011. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign50.pdf (accessed June 28, 2012).
Downs, SH, Black, N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–384.
Whiting, PF, Rutjes, AW, Westwood, ME, et al.
QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–536.
Shea, BJ, Grimshaw, JM, Wells, GA, et al.
Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10.
Brouwers, MC, Kho, ME, Browman, GP, et al.
AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182:E839–842.
Yaffe, J, Montgomery, P, Hopewell, S, Shepard, LD. Empty reviews: A description and consideration of Cochrane systematic reviews with no included studies. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36626.
Cameron, A, Watt, A, Lathlean, T, Sturm, T. Rapid versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment. ASERNIP-S report no. 60. Adelaide (South Australia): Australian Safety & Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures – Surgical (ASERNIP-S); 2007. http://www.surgeons.org/media/297941/rapidvsfull2007_systematicreview.pdf (accessed March 1, 2012).
Watt, A, Cameron, A, Sturm, L, et al.
Rapid versus full systematic reviews: Validity in clinical practice?
ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:1037–1040.
Thomas, J, Newman, M, Oliver, S. Rapid evidence assessments of research to inform social policy: Taking stock and moving forward. Evid Policy. 2013;9:5–27.
Kamel, C, McGahan, L, Mierzwinski-Urban, M, Embil, J. Preoperative skin antiseptic preparations and application techniques for preventing surgical site infections: A systematic review of the clinical evidence and guidelines. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2011. (Rapid response report: Systematic review). http://www.cadth.ca/media/pdf/htis/june-2011/M0025_Pre-Operative_Skin_Prep_Final.pdf (accessed June 28, 2012).
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator for diabetic neuropathy: Clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness. Ottawa: The Agency; 2011. (Rapid response report: Summary of abstracts). http://cadth.ca/media/pdf/htis/july-2011/RB0395_TENS_final.pdf (accessed October 15, 2012).