Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:54:54.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Policy brief on improving access to artemisinin-based combination therapies for malaria in Mozambique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2010

Francisco Mbofana
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Saúde
Gertrudes Machatine
Affiliation:
Ministry of Health, Maputo
Celeste Moreira
Affiliation:
Health Woman and Social Welfare Services, Matola

Extract

Malaria is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Mozambique. Approximately 6 million cases are reported each year. Malaria accounts for approximately 40 percent of all outpatient visits and 60 percent of pediatric hospital admissions. It is the leading cause of death among children admitted to pediatric services. Malaria transmission takes place year round with a seasonal peak extending from December to April. More than 18.5 million people in Mozambique are considered to be at-risk of malaria, including an estimated 3.6 million children less than 5 years old and almost 1 million pregnant women (13). The Presidential Malaria Initiative (PMI) -supported Malaria Indicator Survey, conducted in 2007, found the national prevalence of malaria parasitemia among children 6 to 59 months old to be 38.5 percent, with a range by province from 60.4 percent in Nampula to less than 10 percent in Maputo. Among pregnant women, the parasite prevalence was 16.3 percent, with 30.1 percent of women in their first pregnancy demonstrating parasites on blood slides (11).

Type
THEME SECTION: OPTIONS FOR IMPROVING MALARIA TREATMENT
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bang, AT, Bang, RA, Baitule, SB, Reddy, MH, Deshmukh, MD. Effect of home-based neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: Field trial in rural India. Lancet. 1999;354:19551961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Bang, AT, Reddy, HM, Deshmukh, MD, Baitule, SB, Bang, RA. Neonatal and infant mortality in the ten years (1993 to 2003) of the Gadchiroli field trial: Effect of home based neonatal care. J Perinatol. 2005;25:S92S107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Bhutta, ZA, Darmstadt, GL, Hasan, BS, Haws, RA. Community-based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes in developing countries. Pediatrics. 2005;115 (Suppl 2):519617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Borghi, J, Thapa, B, Osrin, D, et al. Economic evaluation of a women's group intervention to improve birth outcomes in rural Nepal. Lancet. 2005;366:18821884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Buchan, JMD, Dal Poz, MR. Role definition, skill mix, multi-skilling, and new workers. In: Ferriho, P, Dal Poz, M, eds. Towards a global workforce strategy: Studies in health services organisation and policy. Antwerp: ITG Press; 2003;275300.Google Scholar
6. Gericke, CA, Kurowski, C, Ranson, MK, Mills, A. Feasibility of scaling-up interventions: The role of intervention design. Disease Control Priorities Project Working Paper No. 13. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2003.Google Scholar
7. Haines, A, Sanders, D, Lehmann, U, et al. Achieving child survival goals: Potential contribution of community health workers. Lancet. 2007;369:21212131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Hongoro, C, McPake, B. How to bridge the gap in human resources for health. Lancet. 2004;364:14511456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kindane, G, Morrow, RH. Teaching mothers to provide home treatment of malaria in Tigray, Ethiopia: A randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;356:550555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Lewin, SA, Dick, J, Pond, P, et al. Lay health workers in primary and community health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;1:CD004015.Google Scholar
11. Mabunda, S, Casimiro, S, Quinto, L, Alonso, P. A country wide malaria survey in Mozambique I. Plasmodium falciparum infection in children across different epidemiological settings. Malaria J. 2008;7:216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Manandhar, DS, Osrin, D, Shrestha, BP, et al. Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: Cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:970979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Ministry of Health. Malaria situation analysis in Mozambique report. Maputo: Ministry of Health; 2007.Google Scholar
14. Ministry of Health. Strategic plan for malaria control in Mozambique 2006–2010. Maputo: Ministry of Health; 2005.Google Scholar
15. Ministry of Planning and Development. Poverty and millennium development goals. Statistic information 2009. Maputo: MPD; 2009.Google Scholar
16. National Institute of Statistics and National Institute of Health. National causes of deaths community survey report. Maputo: NIS/NIH; 2009.Google Scholar
17. Patouillard, E, Goodman, CA, Hanson, KG, Mills, AJ. Can working with the private for-profit sector improve utilization of quality health services by the poor? A systematic review of the literature. Int J Equity Health. 2007;6:17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sazawal, S, Black, RE. Effect of pneumonia case management on mortality in neonates, infants, and preschool children: A meta-analysis of community-based trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:547556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Walker, DG, Jan, S. The cost-effectiveness of community health workers: A review of the evidence and methodological critique. J Community Health. 2005;30:221229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Winch, PJ, Gilroy, KE, Wolfheim, C, et al. Intervention models for the management of children with signs of pneumonia or malaria by community health workers. Health Policy Plan. 2005;20:199212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.Google Scholar