Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Pattern and factors leading to the diffusion of magnetic resonance imaging in Korean hospitals

  • Myung-Il Hahm (a1), Eun-Cheol Park (a1), Sun-Hee Lee (a2), Chung Mo Nam (a3), Hye-Young Kang (a3), Hoo-Yeon Lee (a3) and Woo-Hyun Cho (a3)...

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the diffusion patterns of new medical technologies in Korean hospitals. We also sought to identify critical factors leading to the decision to acquire capital-intensive medical technology. The rationale and timing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions were retrospectively evaluated according to a “whether, when, and why” paradigm.

Methods: We analyzed data pertaining to 232 hospitals with active medical residency programs. Of these, 185 hospitals owned or leased an MRI unit, and 47 had not acquired units as of June 2004. Data were collected from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korean National Statistical Office, and Korean Hospital Association databases, and variables were identified and classified as predisposing, enabling, or reinforcing factors.

Results: The MRI diffusion rate curve was linear for two types of hospital but was S-shaped for tertiary hospitals, which were early adopters of MRI. Significant predictors for MRI adoption included the per capita number of regional physicians (+), total number of existing regional MRI units (−), percentage of the regional population over 65 years of age (+), private ownership of the hospital, presence of a radiology residency program, number of beds (+), and regional per capita taxable income (+).

Conclusions: Diffusion of MRI technology is occurring rapidly across Korean hospitals. The factors affecting MRI adoption in Korea are similar to the factors documented in other countries, namely regional population over age 65, regional income per capita, large hospitals, and teaching hospitals. This study provides baseline information for predicting diffusion patterns of other new and/or expensive medical technologies.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1.Baker, LC, Wheeler, SK. Managed care and technology diffusion: The case of MRI. Health Aff (Millwood). 1998; 17: 195207.
2.Baker, LC. Managed care and technology adoption in health care: Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. J Health Econ. 2001; 20: 395421.
3.Banta, HD. Embracing or rejecting innovations: Clinical diffusion of health care technology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
4.Escarce, JJ. Externalities in hospitals and physician adoption of a new surgical technology: An exploratory analysis. J Health Econ. 1996; 15: 715734.
5.Folland, S, Goodman, AC, Stano, M. The economics of health and health care. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc; 2004.
6.Friedman, LH, Goes, JB. The timing of medical technology acquisition: Strategic decision making in turbulent environments. J Health Manag. 2000; 45: 317330.
7.Health Insurance Review Agency (HIRA), Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) in Korea. The research for the management of the MRI coverage. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2004.
8.Health Insurance Review Agency (HIRA) in Korea. A report on the appropriateness of benefit for computerized tomography procedures. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2002.
9.Hillman, AL, Schwartz, S. The adoption and diffusion of CT and MRI in the United States. Med Care. 1985; 23: 12831294.
10.Hutubessy, RC, Hanvoravongchai, P, Edejer, TT. Diffusion and utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in Asia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002; 18: 690704.
11.Lee, YS. Profitability determinants of hospitals in Korea. Doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University; 2002.
12.OECD working party on Biotechnology. Draft final report of the new and emerging health-related technologies project. Paris: OECD; 2004.
13.Oh, EH, Imanaka, Y, Evans, E. Determinants of the diffusion of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005; 21: 7380.
14.Olsson, S. Diffusion, utilisation and regional variations in the use of CT and MRI in Sweden. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2001; 66: 129135.
15.Rogers, E. Diffusion of innovation. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press; 1995.
16.Slade, EP, Anderson, GF. The relationship between per capita income and diffusion of medical technologies. Health Policy. 2001; 58: 114.
17.Sloan, FA, Valvona, J, Perrin, JM. Diffusion of surgical technology. J Health Econ. 1986; 5: 3161.
18.Steinberg, EP, Sick, J, Locke, K. X-ray CT and MRI: Diffusion patterns and policy issues. N Engl J Med. 1985; 3: 859864.
19.Teplensky, JD, Pauly, MV, Kimberly, JR et al. , Hospital adoption of medical technology: An empirical test of alternative models. Health Serv Res. 1995; 30: 437465.
20.Yoon, SJ. Adoption and diffusion process of computerized tomography in Korea. Master's dissertation, Seoul National University; 1997.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed