1.Banta, H. D., & Luce, B. R.Health care technology and its assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 75–82.
2.Banta, H. D., & Luce, B. R.Health care technology and its assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 176–187.
3.Battista, R. N., Banta, D. H., Jonsson, E. et al. Lessons from the eight countries. Health Policy, 1994, 30, 397–421.
4.Clark, E., & Marshall, D. (eds.) Technology assessment: National and international perspectives on research and practice. Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for health technology assessment, 1992.
5.Cochrane, A. L.Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London: Cambridge University Press, 1989, 20–25.
6.Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
7.Deber, R.Translating technology assessment into policy: Conceptual issues and tough choices. InternationalJournal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1992, 8, 131–37.
8.Drummond, M. F. Economic appraisal of health technology in the European Community: Future directions. In Drummond, M. F., Economic appraisal of health technology in th European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987, 147–52.
9.Fuchs, V. R., & Garber, A. M.The new technology assessment. New England Journal of Medicine, 1990, 323, 673–77.
10.Institute of Medicine. Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985, 70–79.
11.Lind, J. An inquiry into the nature, causes, and cure of the scurvy. In Buck, C., Llopis, A., Nájera, E., & Terris, M. (eds.). The challenge of epidemiology: Issues and selected readings. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organizations, 1988, 20–23.
12.Lomas, J.Retailing research: Increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for child birth. Milbank Quarterly, 1993, 71, 439–75.
13.Perry, S., & Pillar, B.A national policy for health care technology assessment. Medical care Review, 1990, 47, 401–17.
14.Petitti, D.Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
15.Power, E. J., Tunis, S. R., & Wagner, J. L.Technology assessment and public health. Annual Reviews of Public Health, 1994, 15, 561–79.
16.Sachs, H. S.Berrier, J.Reitman, D. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 1987, 316, 450–55.
17.Simes, J.Meta-analysis: Its importance in cost-effectiveness studies. Medical Journal of Australia, 1990, 153(suppl.), 513–16.
18.U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Development of medical technology: Opportunities for assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office, 1976.
19.World Bank. World development report 1993: Investing in health. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993, 134–55.