Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Internal evaluation of the European network for Health Technology Assessment project

  • Lise Lund Håheim (a1), Iñaki Imaz (a2), Marlène Läubli Loud (a3), Teresa Gasparetto (a4), Jesús González-Enriquez (a2), Helena Dahlgren (a5), Igor Trofimovs (a6), Elena Berti (a7) and Berit Mørland (a8)...

Abstract

Objectives: The internal evaluation studied the development of the European network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) Project in achieving the general objective of establishing an effective and a sustainable network of health technology assessment (HTA) in Europe.

Methods: The Work Package 3 group was dedicated to this task and performed the work. Information on activities during the project was collected from three sources. First, three yearly cross-sectional studies surveyed the participants’ opinions. Responses were by individuals or by institutions. The last round included surveys to the Steering Committee, the Stakeholder Forum, and the Secretariat. Second, the Work Package Lead Partners were interviewed bi-annually, five times in total, to update the information on the Project's progress. Third, additional information was sought in available documents.

Results: The organizational structure remained stable. The Project succeeded in developing tools aimed at providing common methodology with intent to establish a standard of conducting and reporting HTA and to facilitate greater collaboration among agencies. The participants/agencies expressed their belief in a network and in maintaining local/national autonomy. The Work Package Leaders expressed a strong belief in the solid base of the Project for a future network on which to build, but were aware of the need for funding and governmental support.

Conclusions: Participants and Work Package Leaders have expressed support for a future network that will improve national and international collaboration in HTA based on the experience from the EUnetHTA project.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Internal evaluation of the European network for Health Technology Assessment project
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Internal evaluation of the European network for Health Technology Assessment project
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Internal evaluation of the European network for Health Technology Assessment project
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. EUnetHTA. Collaboration Proposal – way forward for HTA in Europe. Available at: http://www.eunethta.net/Public/News_archive/EUnetHTA_Collaboration_Proposal_-_way_forward_for_HTA_in_Europe/.
2. EUnetHTA. Internal Evaluation Report (2006–2008). Available at: http:/www.eunethta.net/upload/WP3/Internal_Evaluation_EUnetHTA_2006-08.pdf.
4. EUnetHTA. Standard operating procedures. The EUnetHTA Project 2006. Available at: http://www.eunethta.net/Archives_Project_2006-08/ (restricted access).
5. European Union. Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General. High level group on health services and medical care. Report from the High Level Group to the Employment, Social Affairs, Health and Consumer Protection Council on 6–7 December 2004. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_overview/co_operation/healthcare/docs/highlevel_2004_026_en.pdf.
6. Guba, EG, Lincoln, YS. Fourth generation evaluation. New York: Sage Publications; 1989.
7. Jonsson, E, Banta, D, Henshall, C, Sampietro-Colom, L. Executive summary of the ECHTA/ECAHI Project. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18:213217.
8. Kristensen, FB, Mäkelä, M, Allgurin Neikter, S, et al. European network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA: Planning, development, and implementation of a sustainable European network for Health Technology Assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 (Suppl 2):107116.
9. Kristensen, FB, Lampe, K, Chase, DL, et al. Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: Structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 (Suppl 2):18.
10. Kvale, S. Interview. An introduction to the research interview. (In Swedish). 3rd ed. Copenhagen: Hans Reizels Forlag; 1997.
11. SPSS version 15.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
12. Weiss, CH. Evaluation. Methods for studying programs and politics. 2nd ed. Harvard University, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1998.
13. Wilkinson, D, Birmingham, P. Using research instruments – A guide for researchers. London: Routledge Falmer; 2003.

Keywords

Internal evaluation of the European network for Health Technology Assessment project

  • Lise Lund Håheim (a1), Iñaki Imaz (a2), Marlène Läubli Loud (a3), Teresa Gasparetto (a4), Jesús González-Enriquez (a2), Helena Dahlgren (a5), Igor Trofimovs (a6), Elena Berti (a7) and Berit Mørland (a8)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed