Skip to main content Accessibility help

Health technology assessment: a sociological commentary on reflexive innovation

  • Andrew Webster (a1)


This study provides a sociological commentary on the current debates within health technology assessment (HTA), specifically in response to the approaches taken in France, The Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. It argues that HTA is part of a wider reflexive innovation system that seeks to order current and prospective technologies. The study discusses the socio-political process of HTA priority setting, the rhetorical role of HTA, the localised and contingent use of HTA, and the policy gap between guidelines and practice. It argues for the development of new types of methodologies for assessment and for a stronger social embedding of HTA practice.



Hide All
Barry A. 2001 Political machines. London: The Athlone Press;
Beck U. 1992 The risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage;
Blume S. 1998 Early warning in the light of theories of technological change. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 14: 613623.
Brown N, Michael M. 2002 From authority to authenticity: Governance, transparency and biotechnology. Health Risk Society. 4: 259272.
Brown N, Rappert B, Webster A, eds. 2000 Contested futures. London: Ashgate;
Burrows R, Nettleton S. 2001 Reflexive modernisation and the emergence of wired self-help. In: Renninger KA, Shumar W, eds. Building virtual communities. New York: CUP;
Callon M. 2002 The increasing involvement of concerned groups in R&D policies: What lessons for public powers?. Paper presented at NPRnet Symposium, University of Sussex, March,
Faulkner A. 1997 In: Elston MA, ed. The Sociology of Medical Science and Technology. Oxford: Blackwell; 183207.
Foss L, Rotherberg K. 1987 The second medical revolution. London: Shambhala;
Giddens A. 1991 The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press;
Heaton J. 2001 Technology and time: Home care regimes and technology-dependent children. ESRC Innovative Health technologies Programme: University of York;
de Jong M. 1999 Institutionalised criticism: The demonopolisation of scientific advising. Science Public Policy. 26: 193199.
Kuhn TS. 1970 The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press;
Lupton D. 1999 Risk. London: Routledge;
Lynch M. 2000 Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory Culture Society. 17: 2654.
Lyon D. 2002 Surveillance studies: Understanding visibility, mobility and the phenetic fix. Editorial. Surveillance Society. 1: 17.
Nowotny H, et al. 2000 Rethinking science. Cambridge: Polity Press;
Quoted in interview with Professor Zygmunt Bauman, 2002 Newsletter, British Sociological Association, October 2.
Robert G, Stevens A, Gabbay J. 1999 Early warning systems for identifying new healthcare technologies. Health Technol Assess. 13: 3.
Stehr N. 1994 Knowledge societies. London: Sage;
Strydom P. 1999 The civilisation of the gene: Biotechnological risk framed in the responsibility discourse. In: O'Mahony P, ed. Nature, risk and responsibility. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 2136.
Webster A, et al. 2002 Foresight as a tool for the management of knowledge and innovation. Report to European Commission: Brussels,
Webster A. 2002 Innovative health technologies and the social: Redefining health, medicine and the body. Curr Sociology. 50: 443457.
Webster A, Brown N. 2003 New medical technologies and society: Re-ordering life. Cambridge: Polity Press;



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed