Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Economic Forces and Hospital Technology: A Perspective from Europe

  • Martin J. Buxton (a1)

Abstract

The paper considers the economic characteristics of technology and suggests a categorization based on the economic nature of particular technologies and their effect on the product health care that may be helpful in considering the economics of technology in hospitals.

It reviews the range of economic forces that might be expected to apply to the use of technology in the hospital setting, and notes some of the evidence to support such hypotheses. In considering the limited evidence from the United Kingdom and elsewhere in Europe, the paper contrasts its focus on socio-political, institutional, and organizational factors, rather than the direct economic factors considered in the United States work.

It suggests that the multiplicity of forces at work make cross-national, empirical, and policy analyses very difficult. Indeed, without more economic appraisal the effect of differences in technology adoption cannot be evaluated.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1.Aaron, H. J., & Schwartz, W. B.The painful prescription: Rationing hospital care. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, 1984.
2.Abel-Smith, B.Cost containment in health care: The experience of 12 European countries 1977–83. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1984.
3.Coleman, J., Katz, E., & Menzel, H.The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 1959, 20, 253270.
4.Committee on Technology and Health Care, National Academy of Sciences. Medical technology and the health care system. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1979.
5.Council for Science and Society. Expensive medical techniques. London: Council for Science and Society, 1982.
6.Dasgupta, P., & David, P. A.Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology, Discussion Paper no. 73. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
7.Drummond, M. F., & Hutton, J. Economic appraisal of health technology in the UK. In Drummond, M. F. (ed.), Economic appraisal of health technology in the European community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
8.Evans, R. G.Strained mercy: The economics of Canadian health care. Toronto: Butterworths, 1984.
9.Finkelstein, S. N., Scheetman, S. B., Sondik, E. J., & Gilbert, D. Clinical trials and established medical practice: Two examples. In Roberts, E. B.Levy, R. I., & Finkelstein, S. N. (eds.), Biomedical innovations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981.
10.Finkler, S. A.Cost-effectiveness of regionalisation: The heart surgery example. Inquiry, 1979, 16, 264.
11.Finkler, S. A.Cost-effectiveness of regionalisation: Further results for heart surgery. Health Services Research, 1981, 16, 325333.
12.Goddeeris, J. H.Economic forces on hospital technology: Lessons from the U.S. experience. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1987, 3, 223240.
13.Groot, L. M. J., Lacronique, J. F., & Stocking, B.Report of the second phase of the study of medical technology. European Commission: Directorate General V, 1983 (mimeo).
14.Jennett, B.High technology medicine: Benefits and burdens. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
15.Klein, R.Rationing health care. British Medical Journal, 1984, 289, 143144.
16.Kregel, J. A.The theory of economic growth. London: Macmillan, 1972.
17.Luft, H., Bunker, J., & Enthoven, A. C.Should operations be regionalised? The empirical relationship between surgical volume and mortality. New England Journal of Medicine, 1979, 301, 1364–69.
18.Office of Technology Assessment. Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) and the Medicare program: Implications for medical technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (OTA-TM-H-17), 1983.
19.Office of Technology Assessment. Medical technology and costs of Medicare program. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (OTA-H-227), 1984.
20.Office of Technology Assessment. Federal policies and the medical device industry. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (OTA-H-320), 1984.
21.Rogers, E.Diffusion of innovations, 3rd ed.New York: Free Press, 1983.
22.Romeo, A. A., Wagner, J. R., & Lee, R. H.Prospective reimbursement and the diffusion of new technologies in hospital. Journal of Health Economics, 1984, 3, 124.
23.Russell, L. B.Technology in hospitals, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, 1979.
24.Scherer, F.Innovation and growth: Schumpeterian perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984.
25.Sloan, F. A., Valvona, J., Perrin, J. M., & Adamache, K. W.Diffusion of surgical technology. Journal of Health Economics, 1986, 5, 3161.
26.Stocking, B.Initiative and inertia: Case studies in the NHS. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1985.
27.Stocking, B., & Morrison, S. L.The image and the reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press for Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1978.
28.Thomas, L.The technology of medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 1971, 284, 1366–68.

Economic Forces and Hospital Technology: A Perspective from Europe

  • Martin J. Buxton (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed