Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Woolf, Steven H.
2000.
The Best Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer — A Personal Choice.
New England Journal of Medicine,
Vol. 343,
Issue. 22,
p.
1641.
Selby, Joe V
2001.
Screening for colorectal cancer—the patient and the population.
The American Journal of Medicine,
Vol. 111,
Issue. 8,
p.
662.
Vijan, Sandeep
Hwang, Erica W
Hofer, Timothy P
and
Hayward, Rodney A
2001.
Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance.
The American Journal of Medicine,
Vol. 111,
Issue. 8,
p.
593.
Saha, Somnath
Hoerger, Thomas J
Pignone, Michael P
Teutsch, Steven M
Helfand, Mark
and
Mandelblatt, Jeanne S
2001.
The art and science of incorporating cost effectiveness into evidence-based recommendations for clinical preventive services.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 3,
p.
36.
Whynes, D.K.
2002.
The economic case for faecal occult blood screening.
Annals of Oncology,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 12,
p.
1953.
Schoen, Robert E.
2002.
The case for population-based screening for colorectal cancer.
Nature Reviews Cancer,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.
Provenzale, Dawn
2002.
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening the Average-Risk Population for Colorectal Cancer.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
93.
Holmes‐Rovner, Margaret
Williams, Gilbert A.
Hoppough, Susan
Quillan, Lisa
Butler, Rishan
and
Given, C. William
2002.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Persons with Low Income.
Cancer Practice,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 5,
p.
240.
Provenzale, Dawn
Gray, Rebecca N.
Fisher, Deborah A.
and
Schmidt, Troy
2002.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING AND TREATMENT.
Evidence-Based Gastroenterology,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
12.
Klabunde, Carrie N.
Jones, Elizabeth
Brown, Martin L.
and
Davis, William W.
2002.
Colorectal Cancer Screening with Double-Contrast Barium Enema: A National Survey of Diagnostic Radiologists.
American Journal of Roentgenology,
Vol. 179,
Issue. 6,
p.
1419.
Inadomi, John M
and
Sonnenberg, Amnon
2003.
An evidence-based medicine approach to economic studies: assessing the cost-effectiveness of competing strategies for colorectal cancer screening.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 5,
p.
404.
Lieberman, David
2003.
Colonoscopy.
p.
131.
O’Brien, Kevin
Sweeney, Brian F
Conger, Nicholas
Fischer, Joseph R
and
Lang, Kevin A
2003.
Prevalence of proximal adenomas after an adenoma is found on flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Cancer Detection and Prevention,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
259.
Inadomi, John M.
2003.
Update on the cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal neoplasia.
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
44.
Walsh, Judith M. E.
and
Terdiman, Jonathan P.
2003.
Colorectal Cancer Screening.
JAMA,
Vol. 289,
Issue. 10,
p.
1297.
Loeve, Franka
Boer, Rob
Zauber, Ann G.
van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
van Oortmarssen, Gerrit J.
Winawer, Sidney J.
and
Habbema, J. Dik F.
2004.
National Polyp Study data: Evidence for regression of adenomas.
International Journal of Cancer,
Vol. 111,
Issue. 4,
p.
633.
Brouse, Corey H.
Basch, Charles E.
Wolf, Randi L.
and
Shmukler, Celia
2004.
Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in a low income, urban population: a descriptive study.
Health Education,
Vol. 104,
Issue. 2,
p.
68.
Provenzale, Dawn
and
Gray, Rebecca N.
2004.
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Treatment: Review of Outcomes Research.
JNCI Monographs,
Vol. 2004,
Issue. 33,
p.
45.
Stone, Christine A.
Carter, Robert C.
Vos, Theo
and
John, James St
2004.
Colorectal cancer screening in Australia: An economic evaluation of a potential biennial screening program using faecal occult blood tests.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
273.
Ladabaum, Uri
Song, Kenneth
and
Fendrick, A.Mark
2004.
Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 7,
p.
554.