Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS BASED ON PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CONDITIONS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

  • Marlène Guillon (a1), Lise Rochaix (a2) and Jean-Claude K. Dupont (a3)

Abstract

Objectives:

The aim of this study is to review evidence on the cost-effectiveness of exercise-based interventions in the treatment of chronic conditions a decade after the publication of Roine et al. in 2009 (Roine E, Roine RP, Räsänen P, et al. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:427–454).

Methods:

We carried out a review of published articles in PUBMED and JSTOR between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016. Full economic evaluations of exercise programs targeting patients with a chronic condition were eligible for inclusion. Data on program, design, and economic characteristics were extracted using a predefined extraction form. The quality of the economic evaluations was appraised using the adjusted Consensus Health Economic Criteria List.

Results:

A total of 426 articles were identified and thirty-seven studies were selected. Eleven studies dealt with musculoskeletal and rheumatologic disorders, ten with cardiovascular diseases, six with neurological disorders, three with mental illnesses, three with cancers, and four with diabetes, respiratory diseases, or pelvic organ prolapse. In total, 60 percent of exercise programs were dominant or cost-effective. For musculoskeletal and rheumatologic disorders, 72 percent of programs were dominant or cost-effective while this was the case for 57 percent of programs for cardiovascular diseases using a nonsurgical comparator.

Conclusions:

There is clear evidence in favor of exercise-based programs for the treatment of musculoskeletal and rheumatologic disorders and, to a lesser extent, for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. More research is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of physical activity in the treatment of neurological disorders, mental illnesses, cancers, respiratory diseases, and diabetes/obesity.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1.Pedersen, BK, Saltin, B. Exercise as medicine–evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:1-72.
2.Roine, E, Roine, RP, Räsänen, P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of interventions based on physical exercise in the treatment of various diseases: a systematic literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:427-454.
3.OECD [Intenet]. Purchasing power parities (PPP) (indicator). [cited May 19, 2018]. https://data.oecd.org/conversion/purchasing-power-parities-ppp.htm (accessed August 14, 2018).
4.Higgins, JP, Altman, DG, Gøtzsche, PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
5.Evers, S, Goossens, M, De Vet, H, Van Tulder, M, Ament, A. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:240-245.
6.Higgins, JP, Green, S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Vol. 4. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
7.Odnoletkova, I, Goderis, G, Pil, L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of therapeutic education to prevent the development and progression of type 2 diabetes. Systematic Review. J Diabetes Metab. 2014;5:438.
8.van Eeden, M, van Heugten, CM, van Mastrigt, GA, Evers, SM. Economic evaluation studies of self-management interventions in chronic diseases: A systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32:16-28.
9.Aboagye, E, Karlsson, ML, Hagberg, J, Jensen, I. Cost-effectiveness of early interventions for non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled study investigating medical yoga, exercise therapy and self-care advice. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:167-173.
10.Barton, GR, Sach, TH, Jenkinson, C, et al. Lifestyle interventions for knee pain in overweight and obese adults aged ≥ 45: Economic evaluation of randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;339:b2273.
11.Gusi, N, Tomas-Carus, P. Cost-utility of an 8-month aquatic training for women with fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10:R24.
12.Henchoz, Y, Pinget, C, Wasserfallen, JB, et al. Cost-utility analysis of a three-month exercise programme vs usual care following multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:846-852.
13.Hurley, MV, Walsh, NE, Mitchell, HL, et al. Economic evaluation of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:1220-1229.
14.Manning, VL, Kaambwa, B, Ratcliffe, J, et al. Economic evaluation of a brief education, self-management and upper limb exercise training in people with rheumatoid arthritis (EXTRA) programme: A trial-based analysis. Rheumatology. 2014;54:302-309.
15.Pinto, D, Robertson, MC, Abbott, JH, et al. Manual therapy, exercise therapy, or both, in addition to usual care, for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. 2: Economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1504-1513.
16.Sevick, MA, Miller, GD, Loeser, RF, Williamson, JD, Messier, SP. Cost-effectiveness of exercise and diet in overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:1167-1174.
17.Tan, SS, van Linschoten, RL, van Middelkoop, M, et al. Cost-utility of exercise therapy in adolescents and young adults suffering from the patellofemoral pain syndrome. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20:568-579.
18.Tan, SS, Teirlinck, CH, Dekker, J, et al. Cost-utility of exercise therapy in patients with hip osteoarthritis in primary care. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24:581-588.
19.Williams, MA, Williamson, EM, Heine, PJ, et al. Strengthening And stretching for Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hand (SARAH). A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19:1-222.
20.Hautala, AJ, Kiviniemi, AM, Mäkikallio, T, et al. Economic evaluation of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;27:1395-1403.
21.Kühr, EM, Ribeiro, RA, Rohde, LEP, Polanczyk, CA. Cost-effectiveness of supervised exercise therapy in heart failure patients. Value Health. 2011;14:S100-S107.
22.Mazari, FAK, Khan, JA, Carradice, D, et al. Economic analysis of a randomized trial of percutaneous angioplasty, supervised exercise or combined treatment for intermittent claudication due to femoropopliteal arterial disease. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1172-1179.
23.Reed, SD, Whellan, DJ, Li, Y, et al. Economic evaluation of the HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial: An exercise training study of patients with chronic heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:374.
24.Reynolds, MR, Apruzzese, P, Galper, BZ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of supervised exercise, stenting, and optimal medical care for claudication: Results from the Claudication: Exercise Versus Endoluminal Revascularization (CLEVER) trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e001233.
25.Rincón, M, Rojas, MX, Romero, VAR, et al. Economic evaluation of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs for chronic heart failure patients in Colombia. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016;36:12-19.
26.Spronk, S, Bosch, JL, den Hoed, PT, et al. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular revascularization compared to supervised hospital-based exercise training in patients with intermittent claudication: A randomized controlled trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:1472-1480.
27.van Asselt, ADI, Nicolaï, SPA, Joore, MA, Prins, MH, Teijink, JAW. Exercise Therapy in Peripheral Arterial Disease Study Group. Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with intermittent claudication: Supervised exercise therapy versus a “go home and walk” advice. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41:97-103.
28.Van Den Houten, MML, Lauret, GJ, Fakhry, F, et al. Cost-effectiveness of supervised exercise therapy compared with endovascular revascularization for intermittent claudication. Br J Surg. 2016;103:1616-1625.
29.Witham, MD, Fulton, RL, Greig, CA, et al. Efficacy and cost of an exercise program for functionally impaired older patients with heart failure: A randomized controlled trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:209-216.
30.Farag, I, Sherrington, C, Hayes, A, et al. Economic evaluation of a falls prevention exercise program among people With Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2016;31:53-61.
31.Fletcher, E, Goodwin, VA, Richards, SH, Campbell, JL, Taylor, RS. An exercise intervention to prevent falls in Parkinson's: An economic evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:426.
32.McCrone, P, Sharpe, M, Chalder, T, et al. Adaptive pacing, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome: A cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40808.
33.Sabes-Figuera, R, McCrone, P, Hurley, M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of counselling, graded-exercise and usual care for chronic fatigue: Evidence from a randomised trial in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:264.
34.Slaman, J, van den Berg-Emons, R, Tan, SS, et al. Cost-utility of a lifestyle intervention in adolescents and young adults with spastic cerebral palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2015;47:338-345.
35.Tosh, J, Dixon, S, Carter, A, et al. Cost effectiveness of a pragmatic exercise intervention (EXIMS) for people with multiple sclerosis: Economic evaluation of a randomised controlled trial. Mult Scler J. 2014;20:1123-1130.
36.d'Amico, F, Rehill, A, Knapp, M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of exercise as a therapy for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia within the EVIDEM-E randomised controlled trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016;31:656-665.
37.Edwards, RT, Linck, P, Hounsome, N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a national exercise referral programme for primary care patients in Wales: Results of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1021.
38.Gusi, N, Reyes, MC, Gonzalez-Guerrero, JL, Herrera, E, Garcia, JM. Cost-utility of a walking programme for moderately depressed, obese, or overweight elderly women in primary care: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:231.
39.Gordon, LG, DiSipio, T, Battistutta, D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a pragmatic exercise intervention for women with breast cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2017;26:649-655.
40.Mewes, JC, Steuten, LMG, Duijts, SFA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy and physical exercise for alleviating treatment-induced menopausal symptoms in breast cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9:126-135.
41.Retèl, VP, van der Molen, L, Hilgers, FJ, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:475.
42.Panman, CM, Wiegersma, M, Kollen, BJ, et al. Two-year effects and cost-effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in mild pelvic organ prolapse: A randomised controlled trial in primary care. BJOG. 2017;124:511-520.
43.Panman, CM, Wiegersma, M, Kollen, BJ, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pessary treatment compared with pelvic floor muscle training in older women with pelvic organ prolapse: 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Menopause. 2016;23:1307-1318.
44.Zwerink, M, Effing, T, Kerstjens, HAM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a community-based exercise programme in COPD self-management. COPD. 2016;13:214-223.
45.Coyle, D, Coyle, K, Kenny, GP, et al. Cost-effectiveness of exercise programs in type 2 diabetes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28:228-234.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Guillon et al. supplementary material
Guillon et al. supplementary material 1

 Word (16 KB)
16 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Guillon et al. supplementary material
Guillon et al. supplementary material 2

 Word (50 KB)
50 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Guillon et al. supplementary material
Guillon et al. supplementary material 3

 Word (42 KB)
42 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Guillon et al. supplementary material
Guillon et al. supplementary material 4

 Word (19 KB)
19 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

Guillon et al. supplementary material
Guillon et al. supplementary material 5

 Word (56 KB)
56 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed