Skip to main content Accessibility help

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in France

  • Christine Bergeron (a1), Nathalie Largeron (a2), Ruth McAllister (a3), Patrice Mathevet (a4) and Vanessa Remy (a2)...


Objectives: A vaccine to prevent diseases due to human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 is now available in France. The objective of this study was to assess the health and economic impact in France of implementing a quadrivalent HPV vaccine alongside existing screening practices versus screening alone.

Methods: A Markov model of the natural history of HPV infection incorporating screening and vaccination, was adapted to the French context. A vaccine that would prevent 100 percent of HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18-associated diseases, with lifetime duration and 80 percent coverage, given to girls at age 14 in conjunction with current screening was compared with screening alone. Results were analyzed from both a direct healthcare cost perspective (DCP) and a third-party payer perspective (TPP). Indirect costs such as productivity loss were not taken into account in this analysis.

Results: The incremental cost per life-year gained from vaccination was €12,429 (TPP) and €20,455 (DCP). The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for the introduction of HPV vaccination alongside the French cervical cancer screening program was €8,408 (TPP) and €13,809 (DCP). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that cost-effectiveness was stable, but was most sensitive to the discount rate used for costs and benefits.

Conclusions: Considering the commonly accepted threshold of €50,000 per QALY, these analyses support the fact that adding a quadrivalent HPV vaccine to the current screening program in France is a cost-effective strategy for reducing the burden of cervical cancer, precancerous lesions, and genital warts caused by HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18.



Hide All
1. Avis du Comité Technique des Vaccinations et du Conseil Supérieur d'Hygiène Publique de France, Section des maladies transmissibles, relatif à la vaccination contre les papillomavirus humains 6, 11, 16 et 18 (séance du 9 mars 2007). 2007
2. Agence Nationale pour le Développement de l'Evaluation Médicale (ANDEM). Pratique des frottis cervicaux pour le dépistage du cancer du col. Paris: ANDEM; 1995.
3. Arbyn, M, Buntinx, F, Van Ranst, M, et al. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: A meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;18:280293.
4. Arveux, P, Breugelmans, G, Cravello, L, et al. Invasive cervical cancer treatment costs in France. Bull Cancer. 2007;94:219224.
5. Auquier, P, Auray, J, Berdeaux, G, et al. French guidelines for the economic evaluation of health care technologies: Methodological recommendations. Paris: Collège des Economistes de la Santé (French Health Economists Association); 2003.
6. Bergeron, C, Breugelmans, JG, Bouee, S, et al. Cervical cancer screening and associated treatment costs in France. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006;34:10361042.
7. Bonneux, L, Birnie, E. The discount rate in the economic evaluation of prevention: A thought experiment. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:123125.
8. Bos, JM, Postma, MJ, Annemans, L. Discounting health effects in pharmacoeconomic evaluations: Current controversies. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23:639649.
9. Bray, F, Sankila, R, Ferlay, J, et al. Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:99166.
10. Canfell, K, Barnabas, R, Patnick, J, et al. The predicted effect of changes in cervical screening practice in the UK: Results from a modelling study. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:530536.
11. Clifford, GM, Rana, RK, Franceschi S, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype distribution in low-grade cervical lesions: Comparison by geographic region and with cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:11571164.
12. Clifford, GM, Smith, JS, Aguado, T, et al. Comparison of HPV type distribution in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:101105.
13. Cosson, M. Hystérectomies pour pathologies bénignes. Paris: Masson-Williams and Wilkins; 1997.
14. Dasbach, EJ, Elbasha, EH, Insinga, RP. Mathematical models for predicting the epidemiologic and economic impact of vaccination against human papillomavirus infection and disease. Epidemiol Rev. 2006;28:88100.
15. Elbasha, EH, Dasbach, EJ, Insinga, RP. Model for assessing human papillomavirus vaccination strategies. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:2841.
16. Exbrayat, C. Evolution de l'incidence et de la mortalité par cancer en France de 1978 a 2000. Rapport InVS, 21 Octobre 2003;107-112.
17. Fender, M, Schott, J, Baldauf, JJ, et al. EVE, une campagne régionale de dépistage du cancer du col de l'utérus. Organisation, résultats à 7 ans et perspectives. Presse Méd. 2003;32:15451551.
18. Ferlay, J, Bray, F, Pisani, P, et al. GLOBOCAN 2002. Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. Lyon: IARC Press 2004; No.5(2).
19. French Health Insurance. (L'assurance maladie). Available at: 2007.
20. Garland, SM, Hernandez-Avila, M, Wheeler, CM, et al. Quadrivalent vaccine against Human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:19281943.
21. Goldie, SJ, Kohli, M, Grima, D, et al. Projected clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of a human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:604615.
22. Insinga, RP, Elbasha, EH. A preliminary assessment of the cost-effectiveness of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine in the United Kingdom using a multi-type transmission dynamic model. 23rd International Papillomavirus Conference and Clinical Workshop; September 1-7, 2006. Prague, Czech Republic.
23. Karnon, J, Peters, J, Platt, J, et al. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: An updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:iii, 1-iii,78.
24. Koutsky, L. Epidemiology of genital human papillomavirus infection. Am J Med. 1997;102:38.
25. Kulasingam, SL, Myers, ER. Potential health and economic impact of adding a human papillomavirus vaccine to screening programs. JAMA. 2003;290:781789.
26. Lamblin, G. Association radio-chirurgicale dans le traitement du cancer du col utérin de plus de 4cm. Université Claude Bernard. UFR Lyon-RTH Laennec, France, 2001; Thèse no. 172.
27. Le secteur libéral des professions de santé en 2003. résultats provisoires (source SNIR). Point Stat N°40 http://wwwsf-endocrinonet/sedmen/indexphp?pageID=821b8df9a316f818e39c7faa001d3fa2 2003.
28. Lukasiewicz, E, Aractingi, S, Flahault, A. Incidence and management of condylomata acuminata by French general physicians. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2002;129:991996.
29. Lukasiewicz, E, Martel, J, Roujeau, JC, et al. Dermatology in private practice in France in 2000. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2002;129:12611265.
30. Mahe, E, Descamps, V, Bouscarat, F, Crickx, B. [Management of external genital warts by dermatologists: A French survey]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2002;129:9971002.
31. Martin, X. L'hystérectomie élargie laparoscopico-vaginale dans le traitement des cancers du col utérin. Université Claude Bernard. UFR Lyon-RTH Laennec, France 1997; Thèse no. 191.
32. McCrory, DC, Matchar, DB, Bastian, L, et al. Evaluation of cervical cytology. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 1999;5:16.
33. Mitchell, MF, Schottenfeld, D, Tortolero-Luna, G, et al. Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:626631.
34. Monsonego, J, Breugelmans, JG, Bouee, S, et al. Anogenital warts incidence, medical management and costs in women consulting gynaecologists in France. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007;35:107113.
35. Mubiayi, N, Bogaert, E, Boman, F, et al. Cytological history of 148 women presenting with invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2002;30:210217.
36. Myers, ER, Green, S, Lipkus, I. Patient preferences for health states related to HPV infection: Visual analogue scales vs. time trade-off elicitation. Proceedings of the 21st International Papillomavirus Conference. Mexico City, Mexico; 2004.
37. Myers, ER, McCrory, DC, Nanda, K, et al. Mathematical model for the natural history of human papillomavirus infection and cervical carcinogenesis. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:11581171.
38. Nanda, K, McCrory, DC, Myers, ER, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:810819.
39. National Agency for Accreditation and Evaluation of Health (ANAES). Recommandations pour la pratique clinique: Conduite à tenir devant un frottis anormal du col de l'utérus. 1998 et actualisation 2002. Available at:
40. Olsson, SE, Villa, LL, Costa, RLR, et al. Induction of immune memory following administration of a prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6/11/16/18 L1 virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine. Vaccine. 2007;25:49314939.
41. Pagliusi, SR. Efficacy and other milestones for human papillomavirus vaccine introduction. Vaccine. 2004;23:569578.
42. Parkin, DM. The epidemiological basis for evaluating screening policies. In New developments in cervical cancer screening and prevention. Oxford: Blackwell Science Limited; 1997.
43. Pretet, JL, Jacquard, AC, Carcopino, X, et al. . Human papillomavirus genotype distribution in invasive cervical cancer in France: EDITH study. Int J. Cancer. 2007, in press.
44. Rousseau, A, Bohet, P, Merliere, J, et al. Évaluation du dépistage individuel du cancer du col de l'utérus: Utilité des données de l'assurance maladie. Bull Epidémiol Hebdomadaire (BEH). 2002;19:8183.
45. Sanders, GD, Taira, AV. Cost-effectiveness of a potential vaccine for human papillomavirus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:3748.
46. The FUTURE II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:19151927.
47. Van de Velde, N, Brisson, M, Boily, MC. Modeling human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness: Quantifying the impact of parameter uncertainty. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:762775.
48. Villa, LL, Costa, RL, Petta, C, et al. High sustained efficacy of a prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus types 6/11/16/18 L1 virus-like particle vaccine through 5 years of follow-up. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:14591466.
49. von Krogh, G. Management of anogenital warts (condylomata acuminata). Eur J Dermatol. 2001;11:598603.
50. Walboomers, JM, Jacobs, MV, Manos, MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189:1219.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in France

  • Christine Bergeron (a1), Nathalie Largeron (a2), Ruth McAllister (a3), Patrice Mathevet (a4) and Vanessa Remy (a2)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.