Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:49:04.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2006

H. David Banta  and
Egon Jonsson
H. David Banta
Affiliation:
World Health Organization
Egon Jonsson
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Battista has written a thoughtful and timely challenge to the field of health technology assessment (HTA). As the author points out, HTA is changing and evolving. One of the greatest challenges is that HTA now seems firmly established in a number of countries, and is being looked to more and more for the “answers.” We accept and endorse Battista's central thesis, and essentially all of his critical questions, including his ideas about future research topics. We hope to evoke further thoughts in the reader and perhaps stimulate other responses, either private and public.

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , July 2006 , pp. 280 - 282
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banta HD, Saxe L. Reimbursement for psychotherapy: Linking efficacy research and public policy making. Am Psychol. 1983; 38: 918– 922.Google Scholar
Banta D, Oortwijn W: Health Technology Assessment in the European Union. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002; 16: 299– 638.Google Scholar
Culyer AJ, Horisberger B, eds. 1983. Economic and medical evaluation of health care technologies. Heidelberg: Springer
EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup on Methodology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997; 13: 186– 219.
EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup on Dissemination. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997; 13: 220– 286.
Heuvel van den E, Wieringh R, Mulder H, et al. Het gebruik van MTA-kennis bij besluitvorming (The use of MTA knowledge in decision-making). Groningen: Noordelijk Cenrum vor Gezondheidsvraagstukken; 1994.
Hofmann B. Towards a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005; 21: 312– 318.Google Scholar
Jonsson E, Marke LA. 1977; CAT scanners: The Swedish experience. Health Care Mgt Review. 2: 37.Google Scholar
Jonsson E, Banta HD, Henshall C, Sampriedo-Colom L. 2002; European Collaboration for Health Technology Assessment: Developing an assessment network. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 18: 213– 455.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. Policy implications of the computed tomography (CT) scanner. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office: 1978.
SBU reports at www.sbu.se
Thorsen T, Makela M. 1999. Changing professional practice. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Health Services Research and Development: