Skip to main content Accessibility help

Variable Z0 applied to the optimal design of multi-stub matching network and a meander monopole

  • Nihad Dib (a1), Ashraf Sharaqa (a2) and Richard A. Formato (a3)


Variable Z0, a new concept in antenna design and optimization, is applied to two optimization problems: a multi-stub matching network (MSMN) using biogeography-based optimization (BBO), and an ultra wideband meander monopole antenna (MMA) using central force optimization (CFO). BBO is a newly-proposed stochastic global search and optimization evolutionary algorithm (EA) used to determine MSMN stub lengths and locations for optimum (minimum) reflection coefficient. CFO is a deterministic EA used to optimize the MMA's impedance bandwidth (IBW) while maintaining good average gain without considering the radiation pattern in detail. Two cases are investigated for both problems: (a) fixed characteristic impedance Z0, and (b) variable characteristic impedance. In the first case, Z0 is a fixed user-specified parameter (the traditional methodology), whereas in the second, it is a true variable quantity whose value is determined by the optimization methodology, which is a new technology. Variable Z0 is a fundamentally different design approach in optimization problems. BBO's fixed Z0 results for MSMN are compared to published data computed using Nelder–Mead optimization with BBO exhibiting better performance. BBO's results are improved even more using Variable Z0 technology. A similar performance improvement is seen for Variable Z0 applied to the CFO-optimized MMA.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author: N. Dib Email:


Hide All
[1]Pozar, D.: Microwave Engineering, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, 2005.
[2]Ulker, S.: Particle swarm optimization application to microwave circuits. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., 50 (5) (2008), 13331336.
[3]Deniz, E.; Ulker, S.: Clonal selection algorithm application to simple microwave matching network. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., 53 (5) (2011), 991993.
[4]Simon, D.: Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 12 (6) (2008), 702713.
[5]Simon, D.; Ergezer, M.; Du, D.; Rarick, R.: Markov models for biogeography-based optimization. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B: Cybern., 41 (1) (2011), 299306.
[6]Simon, D.; Rarick, R.; Ergezer, M.; Du, D.: Analytical and numerical comparisons of biogeography-based optimization and genetic algorithms. Inf. Sci., 181 (7) (2011), 12241248.
[7]Roy, P.; Ghoshal, S.; Thakur, S.: Biogeography based optimization for multi-constraint optimal power flow with emission and non-smooth cost function. Expert Syst. Appl., 37 (12) (2010), 82218228.
[8]Bhattacharya, A.; Chattopadhyay, P.: Hybrid differential evolution with biogeography based optimization for solution of economic load dispatch. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 25 (4) (2010), 19551964.
[9]Singh, U.; Singla, H.; Kamal, T.: Design of Yagi–Uda antenna using biogeography based optimization. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 58 (10) (2010), 33753379.
[10]Sharaqa, A.; Dib, N.: Design of linear and circular antenna arrays using biogeography based optimization, in 2011 IEEE Jordan Conf. on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT), Jordan, 2011.
[11]Singh, U.; Kumar, H.; Kamal, T.: Linear array synthesis using biogeography based optimization. Progr. Electromagn. Res. M, 11 (2010), 2536.
[12]Dib, N.; Sharaqa, A.: On the optimal design of non-uniform circular antenna arrays. J. Appl. Electromagn., 14 (1) (2012), 4259.
[13]Singh, U.; Kamal, T.: Design of non-uniform circular antenna arrays using biogeography-based optimization. IET Microw. Antennas Propag., 5 (11) (2011), 13651370.
[14]Lohokare, M.; Pattnaik, S.; Devi, S.; Panigrahi, B.; Bakwad, K.; Joshi, J.: Modified BBO and calculation of resonant frequency of circular microstrip antenna, in World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing, Coimbatore, India, 2009, 487492.
[15]Lohokare, M.; Pattnaik, S.; Devi, S.; Bakwad, K.; Joshi, J.: Parameter calculation of rectangular microstrip antenna using biogeography-based optimization, in Applied Electromagnetics Conf., Kolkata, India, 2009.
[16]Gong, W.; Cai, Z.; Ling, C.: DE/BBO: a hybrid differential evolution with biogeography-based optimization for global numerical optimization. Soft Comput., 15 (4) (2011), 645665.
[17]Kundra, H.; Sood, M.: Cross-country path finding using hybrid approach of PSO and BBO. Int. J. Comput. Appl., 7 (6) (2010), 1519.
[18]Regoli, C.: Impedance matching by using a multi-stub system, in Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Simulation, Modeling and Optimization, Beijing, China, 2007, 15–17.
[19]Moreno, E.; Vazquez, J.; Baneira-Gomez, M.: Matching in transmission lines with N stubs: analytic development and computational treatment. Int. J. Electr. Eng.. Educ., 36 (1999), 154162.
[20]Formato, R.: Improving bandwidth of Yagi–Uda arrays. Wirel. Eng. Technol., 3 (2012), 1824.
[21]Biogeography-based optimization (BBO). [Online]. Available:
[22]Formato, R.: Central force optimization: a new metaheuristic with applications in applied electromagnetics. Progr. Electromagn. Res., 77 (2007), 425491.
[23]Formato, R.: Improved CFO algorithm for antenna optimization. Progr. Electromagn. Res. B, 19 (2010), 405425.
[24]Qubati, G.; Formato, R.; Dib, N.: Antenna benchmark performance and array synthesis using central force optimization. IET Microw., Antennas Propag., 4 (5) (2010), 583592.
[25]Formato, R.: Central force optimization applied to the PBM suite of antenna benchmarks. February, 2010:
[26]Formato, R.: New techniques for increasing antenna bandwidth with impedance loading. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, 29 (2011), 269288.
[27]Formato, R.: High-performance indoor VHF-UHF antennas: technology update report. National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), FASTROAD (Flexible Advanced Services for Television and Radio On All Devices), Technology Advocacy Program, 15 May 2010:
[28]Formato, R.: Parameter-free deterministic global search with simplified central force optimization, in Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications (ICIC2010), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6215, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, 309318.
[29]Formato, R.: UWB array design using Variable Z0 technology and central force optimization ver. 2. August, 2011:
[30]Formato, R.: A novel methodology for antenna design and optimization: variable Z0 (ver. 2). July 2011:
[31]Formato, R.: Variable Z0 antenna device design system and method. US Patent Application Publication No. US 2012/0331436 A1, December 27, 2012 (
[32]Formato, R.: Issues in antenna optimization – a monopole case study. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Journal, in press.
[33]Burke, G.: Numerical Electromagnetics Code – NEC-4.2 Method of Moments, Part I: User's Manual, LLNL-SM-490875, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA, July 15, 2011.
[34]Burke, G.: Numerical Electromagnetics Code – NEC-4, Method of Moments, Part I: User's Manual and Part II: Program Description – Theory, UCRL-MA-109338, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA, January 1992.
[35]Burke, G.; Poggio, A.: Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC) – Method of Moments, Parts I, II and III, UCID-19934, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA, January 1981.
[36]4NEC2 antenna modeling freeware, Arie Voors:
[37]Altshuler, E.: Design of a vehicular antenna for GPS/iridium using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 48 (2000), 968972.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Variable Z0 applied to the optimal design of multi-stub matching network and a meander monopole

  • Nihad Dib (a1), Ashraf Sharaqa (a2) and Richard A. Formato (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.