## REFERENCES

[1]
Clouston, E.N.; Langsford, P.A.; Evans, S.: Measurement of anechoic chamber reflections by time-domain techniques. IEE Proc. H, Microw. Antennas Propag., 135 (2) (pt. H) (1988), 93–97.

[2]
Nagatoshi, M.; Hirose, M.; Tanaka, H.; Kurokawa, S.; Morishita, H.: A method of pattern measurement to cancel reflection waves in anechoic chamber, in Proc. Antennas and Propagation Society Int. Symp., San Diego, CA, 5–11 July 2008, 1–4.

[3]
Black, D.N.; Joy, E.B.: Test zone field compensation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 43 (4) (1995), 362–368.

[4]
Van Blaricum, M.L.; Mittra, R.: A technique for extracting the poles and residues of a system directly from its transient response. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., **AP-23** (6) (1975), 777–781.

[5]
Sarkar, T.K.; Nebat, J.; Weiner, D.D.; Jain, V.K.: Suboptimal approximation/identification of transient waveforms from electromagnetic systems by pencil-of-function method. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., **AP-28** (6) (1980), 928–933.

[6]
Hua, Y.; Sarkar, T.K.: Generalized pencil-of-function method for extracting poles of an EM system from its transient response. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 37 (2) (1989), 229–234.

[7]
Sarkar, T.K.; Pereira, O.: Using the matrix pencil method to estimate the parameters of a sum of complex exponentials. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., 37 (1) (1995), 48–55.

[8]
Adve, R.S.; Sarkar, T.K.; Pereira-Filho, O.M.C.; Rao, S.M.: Extrapolation of time-domain responses from three-dimensional conducting objects utilizing the matrix pencil technique. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 45 (1) (1997), 147–156.

[9]
Gregson, S.; Newell, A.; Hindman, G.: Reflection suppression in cylindrical near-field antenna measurement systems-cylindrical MARS, in Proc. Antenna Measurement Techniques Association, AMTA, Salt Lake City, UT, 1–6 November 2009, 119–125.

[10]
Hindman, G.; Newell, A.: Reflection suppression in large spherical near-field range, in Proc. Antenna Measurement Techniques Association, AMTA, Newport, RI, 30 October–4 November 2005, 270–275.

[11]
Hess, D.W.: The IsoFilterTM technique isolating and individual radiator from spherical near-field data measured in a contaminated environment, in 2nd Eur. Conf. on Antenna and Propagation, EuCAP 2007, Edinburgh, UK, 2007, 1–6.

[12]
Gregson, S.F.; Newell, A.C.; Hindman, G.E.; Carey, M.J.: Application of mathematical absorber reflection suppression to planar near-field antenna measurements, in Proc. of the 5th Eur. Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), Rome, 2011, 3412–3416.

[13]
Gregson, S.F.; Newell, A.C.; Hindman, G.E.; Carey, M.J.: Advances in cylindrical mathematical absorber reflection suppression, in Proc. of the 4th Eur. Conf. on Antennas and Propagation, Barcelona, Spain, 2010, 1–5.

[14]
Cano-Fácila, F.J.; Burgos, S.; Martín, F.; Sierra-Castañer, M.: New reflection suppression method in antenna measurement systems based on diagnostic techniques. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 59 (3) (2011), 941–949.

[15]
Sano, M.; Sierra-Castañer, M.; Hirokawa, J.; Ando, M.: A source reconstruction technique for planar arrays of wide slots, in 2015 9th Eur. Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Lisbon, 2015, 1–2.

[17]
Araque Quijano, J.L.; Scialacqua, L.; Zackrisson, J.; Foged, L.J.; Sabbadini, M.; Vecchi, G.: Suppression of undesired radiated fields based on equivalent currents reconstruction from measured data. IEEE Antenna Wireless Propag. Lett., 10 (2011), 314–317.

[18]
Foged, L.J.
et al. : Echo suppression by spatial-filtering techniques in advanced planar and spherical near-field antenna measurements [AMTA Corner]. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag.
55 (5) (2013), 235–242.

[19]
Young, J.D.; Svoboda, D.E.; Burnside, W.D.: A comparison of time- and frequency-domain measurement techniques in antenna theory. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., **AP-21** (4) (1973), 581–583.

[20]
Sierra-Castañer, M.; Salmerón, T.; Cano-Fácila, F.J.; Burgos, S.; Foged, L.J.; Saccardi, F.: Comparison of echo suppression techniques for far field antenna measurements, in 35th ESA Antenna Workshop on Antenna and Free Space RF Measurements, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, September 2013, 5 pp.

[21]
Aubin, J.; Winebrand, M.; Soerens, R.; Vinogradov, V.: Accurate near-field measurements using time-gating, in Antenna Measurement Techniques Association Annual Symp. Proc., November 2007, 362–365.

[22]
Loredo, S.; Pino, M.R.; Las-Heras, F.; Sarkar, T.K.: Echo identification and cancellation techniques for antenna measurement in non-anechoic test sites. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., 46 (1) (2004), 100–107.

[23]
Loredo, S.; Pino, M.R.; Las-Heras, F.; Sarkar, T.K.: Cancelación de ecos en cámaras de medida no anecoicas, in Actas del XVIII Symp. Nacional de la Unión Científica de Radio, URSI 2003, Spain, 2003, pp. 126–.

[24]
Sierra-Castañer, M.; González-Blanco, P.; López Morales, M.J.; Saccardi, F.; Foged, L.J.: Time and spatial filtering for echo reduction in antenna measurements, in Antenna Measurement Techniques Association, AMTA, Long Beach, California, USA, 1–16 October 2015, 1–5.

[25]
González-Blanco, P.; Sierra-Castañer, M.: Time filtering techniques for echo reduction in antenna measurements, in *2016* 10th Eur. Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Davos, 2016, 1–3.

[26]
Fourestié, B.; Altman, Z.; Wiart, J.; Azoulay, A.: On the use of the matrix-pencil method to correlate measurements at different test sites. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 47 (10) (1999), 1569–1573.