Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:08:42.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“What Belongs Together Can Now Grow Together” – The German Unification Process And Its Legal Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Extract

Since 1990, countless scientific books and articles have been published on the topic of the unification of Germany. I did not mean to add another learned contribution to a subject where everything that could have possibly been said and written has been said and written. I rather intended to familiarize the audience with a rather complex and multidimensional process within the limited space of time of a conference. This, alas!, compelled undue simplification from me. In order not to further complicate a difficult enough subject I felt, above all, constrained to concentrate on the intra-German aspects of unification. As a result, I deliberately had to leave the many international and external problems and developments out of account. This is particularly true for the Treaty on the Final Settlement with respect to Germany (Two-plus-four Treaty) of September 12, 1990, and the Polish-German Border Treaty of November 14, 1990, as well as the termination of international treaties to which the former German Democratic Republic was a party, and Germany's membership in the European Union and NATO after the unification.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the International Association of Law Libraries 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommendations for Further Reading

1) Text of the Treaty establishing a Monetary, Economic and Social Union between the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic, 29 International Legal Materials 1108 (1990), with introductory note by Gerhard Wegen and Christopher Crosswhite.Google Scholar
2) Text of the Treaty on the Establishment of German Unity, 30 International Legal Materials 457 (1991), with introductory note by Gerhard Wegen.Google Scholar
3) Hailbronner, Kay: “Legal Aspects of the Unification of the Two German states”, 2 European Journal of International Law 18 (1991).Google Scholar
4) Singleton, Bradley, Ahrens, Volker, Ries, Peter: “Property Rights in Eastern Germany – An Overview of the Amended Property Law”, 21 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 345 (1991).Google Scholar
5) Quint, Peter: “The Constitutional Law of German Unification”, 50 Maryland Law Review 475 (1991).Google Scholar
6) Dassavant, Oliver, Nösser, Gerhard: “The German Reunification – Legal Implications for Investment in East Germany”, 25 International Lawyer 875 (1992).Google Scholar
7) Elling, Martin: “Privatization in Germany – A Model for Legal and Functional Analysis”, 25 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 581 (1992).Google Scholar
8) Frowein, Jochen: “The Unification of Germany”, 86 American Journal of International Law 152 (1992).Google Scholar
9) Jarausch, Konrad: The Rush to German Unity. New York, Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
10) Pond, Elizabeth: Beyond the Wall – Germany's Road to Unification. Washington, The Brookings Institution, 1993.Google Scholar
11) Frank, Rainer: “Privatization in Eastern Germany – A Comprehensive Study”, 27 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 809 (1994).Google Scholar
12) Goetz, Klaus, Cullen, Peter (editors): Constitutional Policy in Unified Germany. London, Frank Cass, 1995.Google Scholar
13) Singleton, Bradley, Gibbon, Marian, Mack, Kathryn (editors): Dimensions of German Unification – Economic, Social, and Legal Analyses. Boulder, Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
14) Annotated complete texts of “The All Germany Elections Case” (Federal Constitutional Court) and of “The Shootings at the Berlin Wall Case” (Federal High Court for Criminal Matters), in Raymond Young: Sourcebook on German Law. London, Cavendish, 1994. Pp. 53 to 79, and pp. 543 to 603.Google Scholar