Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Property in a shrinking planet: fault lines in international human rights and investment law

  • Lorenzo Cotula (a1)

Abstract

Long at the margins of international law, property is now among the key challenges facing international law- and decision-makers. A ‘shrinking’ planet and a polycentric international law regime provide the backdrop for contestation between different property concepts and claims. While presenting important commonalities in legal concepts and normative content, international investment law and international human rights law protect different and possibly competing rights, reflect different balances of commercial and non-commercial considerations, and embody different standards of legal protection. As the frontiers of natural resource extraction expand, natural resource investments can bring different property concepts and claims directly into tension. In this context, the articulation between investment law and human rights law influences the ways in which international law mediates competition for the world's natural resources, redefining the balance between public and private interests and reshaping spaces for the lawful exercise of state sovereignty.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Property in a shrinking planet: fault lines in international human rights and investment law
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Property in a shrinking planet: fault lines in international human rights and investment law
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Property in a shrinking planet: fault lines in international human rights and investment law
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Allen, Tom (2010) ‘Liberalism, Social Democracy and the Value of Property Under the European Convention on Human Rights’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59(4): 10551078.
Barnes, Richard (2009) Property Rights and Natural Resources. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
Bonnitcha, Jonathan (2014) ‘Investment Treaties and Transition from Authoritarian Rule’, Journal of World Investment and Trade 15(5/6): 9651011.
Christie, George C. (1963) ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property Under International Law?British Yearbook of International Law 38: 307338.
Cotula, Lorenzo (2008) ‘The Right to Food and Resource Access – Conceptual Links’, in Cotula, Lorenzo (ed.), The Right to Food and Access to Natural Resources – Using Human Rights Arguments and Mechanisms to Improve Resource Access for the Rural Poor. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, online: <http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/k8093e/k8093e.pdf>, 1235.
Cotula, Lorenzo (2012) Human Rights, Natural Resource and Investment Law in a Globalised World: Shades of Grey in the Shadow of the Law. London and New York: Routledge.
Cotula, Lorenzo (2013) ‘The New Enclosures? Polany, International Investment Law and the Global Land Rush’, Third World Quarterly 34(9): 16051629.
De schutter, Olivier (2008) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, 21 October 2008, UN Doc. A/63/278, online: <http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/or-2-ungareporta63278en.pdf>.
De schutter, Olivier (2009) Large-Scale Land Acquisitions and Leases: A Set of Minimum Principles and Measures to Address the Human Rights Challenge. Addendum to the Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, 28 December 2009, UN Doc. A/HRC//13/33/Add, online: <http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/20100305_a-hrc-13-33-add2_land-principles_en.pdf>.
De schutter, Olivier (2010) ‘The Emerging Human Right to Land’, International Community Law Review 12: 303334.
Dolzer, Rudolf (1986) ‘Indirect Expropriation of Alien Property’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 1: 4165.
Douglas, Zachary (2009) The International Law of Investment Claims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Douglas, Zachary (2014) ‘Property, Investment and the Scope of Investment Protection Obligations’, in Douglas, Zachary, Pauwelyn, Joost and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 363408.
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie (2009) ‘Unification Rather than Fragmentation of International Law? The Case of International Investment Law and Human Rights Law’, in Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4562.
Ederington, L. Benjamin (1997) ‘Property as a Natural Institution: The Separation of Property from Sovereignty in International Law’, American University International Law Review 13: 263331.
Faundez, Julio (2010) ‘International Economic Law and Development: Before and After Neoliberalism’, in Faundez, Julio and Tan, Celine (eds), International Economic Law, Globalization and Developing Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1033.
Francioni, Francesco (2009) ‘Access to Justice, Denial of Justice, and International Investment Law’, in Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6381.
Fry, James D. (2007) ‘International Human Rights Law in Investment Arbitration: Evidence of International Law's Unity’, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 18: 77149.
García-Amador, Francisco V. (1955) ‘State Responsibility in the Light of the New Trends of International Law’, American Journal of International Law 49: 339346.
Gaventa, John (2002) ‘Introduction: Exploring Citizenship, Participation and Accountability’, IDS Bulletin 33(2): 111.
Golay, Christophe (2013) ‘Legal Reflections on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas: Background Paper Prepared for the First Session of the Working Group on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas.’ Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, online: <http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/WGPleasants/Golay.pdf>.
Hepburn, Jarrod (2012) ‘Analysis: Interim Measures Granted by Inter-American Commission Have Featured in Several Recent Investment Controversies’, IAReporter, online: <http://www.iareporter.com/articles/20120314_1>.
Hirsch, Moshe (2009) ‘Investment Tribunals and Human Rights: Divergent Paths’, in Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97114.
Icsid (2013) The ICSID Caseload – Statistics. Washington DC: International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Issue 2013-2, online: <https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=ICSIDDocRH&actionVal=CaseLoadStatistics>.
Jayasuriya, Kanishka (1999) ‘Globalization, Law and the Transformation of Sovereignty: The Emergence of Global Regulatory Governance’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 6(2): 425455.
Kriebaum, Ursula (2009) ‘Is the European Court of Human Rights an Alternative to Investor–State Arbitration?’, in Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Francioni, Francesco and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 219245.
Kriebaum, Ursula and Schreuer, Christoph (2007) ‘The Concept of Property in Human Rights Law and International Investment Law’, in Breitenmoser, Stephan (ed.), Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber, Human Rights Democracy and the Rule of Law, online: <http://www.univie.ac.at/intlaw/wordpress/pdf/88_concept_property.pdf>, 743762.
Krohnke, Duane W. (2013) ‘Failed Efforts to Weaken the Inter-American Human Rights System under the Guise of Reform’, blog entry, 26 March, online: <http://dwkcommentaries.com/2013/03/26/failed-efforts-to-weaken-the-inter-american-human-rights-system-under-the-guise-of-reform/>.
Lesaffer, Randall (2005) ‘Argument from Roman Law in Current International Law: Occupation and Acquisitive Prescription’, European Journal of International Law 16(1): 2558.
Locke, John (2010 [1689]) Two Treatises of Government, Second Treatise of Government, online: <http://www.gutenberg.org/files/7370/7370-h/7370-h.htm>.
Lund, Christian (2011a) ‘Fragmented Sovereignty: Land reform and Dispossession in Laos’, Journal of Peasant Studies 38(4): 885905.
Lund, Christian (2011b) ‘Property and Citizenship: Conceptually Connecting Land Rights and Belonging in Africa’, Africa Spectrum 46(3): 7175.
Nathan, Laurie (2013) ‘The Disbanding of the SADC Tribunal: A Cautionary Tale’, Human Rights Quarterly 35: 870892.
Nicholson, Francis J. (1965) ‘The Protection of Foreign Property under Customary International Law’, Boston College Law Review VI(3): 391415.
Ong, Aihwa (2000) ‘Graduated Sovereignty in South-East Asia’, Theory Culture Society 17: 5575.
Pennington, Kenneth (1993) The Prince and the Law, 1200–1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Peterson, Luke Eric (2013) ‘First Hearing in Philip Morris v. Australia Arbitration is Pushed into 2014, as New Zealand Reveals it is Awaiting Outcome of Australian Cases’, IAReporter, online: <http://www.iareporter.com/articles/20130228_2>.
Peterson, Luke Eric and Gray, Kevin R. (2003) International Human Rights in Bilateral Investment Treaties and in Investment Treaty Arbitration. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development, online: <http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2003/investment_int_human_rights_bits.pdf>.
Reinisch, August (2008), Legality of Expropriation’, in Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 171204.
Sassen, Saskia (2000) ‘The State and Economic Globalization: Any Implications for International Law?’, Chicago Journal of International Law 1(1): 109116.
Schill, Stephan W. (2009), The Multilateralization of International Investment Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schill, Stephan W. (2012) ‘Cross-Regime Harmonization Through Proportionality Analysis: The Case of International Investment Law, the Law of State Immunity and Human Rights’, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 27: 87119.
Schrijver, Nico (2000) ‘The Changing Nature of State Sovereignty’, British Yearbook of International Law, 6598.
Scolnicov, Anat (2013) ‘Lifelike and Lifeless in Law: Do Corporations Have Human Rights?’ University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 13/2013, online: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2268537>.
Shelton, Dinah (2014) ‘The Rules and the Reality of Petition Procedures in the Inter-American Human Rights System’, George Washington University Law School, The Future of the Inter-American Human Rights System Working Paper No. 2, online: <http://humanrights.nd.edu/assets/134027/sheltonia.pdf>.
Simma, Bruno (2011) ‘Foreign Investment Arbitration: A Place for Human Rights?’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60(3): 573596.
Sprankling, John G. (2014) ‘The Global Right to Property’. Online: Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 52: 464505.
Unctad (2012) Expropriation. Geneva and New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
Valencia Rodríguez, Luís (1993) The Right of Everyone to Own Property Alone as Well as in Association with Others: Completed Final Report, United Nations Commission on Human Rights, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1994/19.
Van Banning, Theo R. G. (2002) The Human Right to Property. Cambridge and Morsel: Intescentia.
Van Harten, Gus (2007) Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Property in a shrinking planet: fault lines in international human rights and investment law

  • Lorenzo Cotula (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.