Skip to main content Accessibility help

From alternative dispute resolution to pluralist dispute resolution: towards an integrated dispute-resolution mechanism in China

  • Zhiqiong June Wang (a1) and Jianfu Chen (a2)


Since 1978, we have observed the steady development of institutions, mechanisms and processes of dispute resolution in China. In the last ten years or so, we then noted frequent issuance of new rules and measures as well as revision of existing laws, the promotion of mediation as the preferred method for resolving disputes and, more recently, the promotion of an integrated dispute-resolution system as a national strategy for comprehensive social control (as well as for resolving disputes), in the name of reforming and strengthening ‘the Mechanism for Pluralist Dispute Resolution’. Careful examination of these latest developments suggests that fundamental changes are taking place that may potentially alter the course of the development of the Chinese dispute-resolution system. These developments are the focus of this paper with an aim to ascertain the nature of the developments and their future direction or directions.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
Bu, Y and Huo, X (2015) The revival of ADR in China: the path to rule of law or the turn against law? In Esplugues, C and Marquis, L (eds), New Development in Civil and Commercial Mediation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 191–223.
Burger, W (1982) Isn't there a better way? American Bar Association Journal 68, 274277.
Chen, J (1995) From Administrative Authorisation to Private Law: A Comparative Perspective of the Developing Civil Law in the PRC. Leiden/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Chen, J (2007) The transformation of Chinese law – from formal to substantial. Hong Kong Law Journal 37, 689739.
Chen, J (2015) The transformation of Chinese law: mark II. Hong Kong Law Journal 24, 911940.
Chen, J (2016a) Chinese Law: Context and Transformation. Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff.
Chen, J (2016b) Out of the shadows and back to the future: CPC and law in China. Asia Pacific Law Review 24, 176201.
Chen, J (2016c) The uncertain future of legal reforms in China's new era. In Bedner, A and Oomen, B (eds), Real Legal Uncertainty and Its Relevance: Essays in Honour of Jan Michiel Otto. Leiden: Leiden University Press, pp. 97108.
China Youth Daily (2010) Our country has prematurely entered into ‘litigation society’ and courts now face some serious challenges, 12 November. Available at (accessed 14 November 2010).
CIETAC (2018) Annual Report on International Commercial Arbitration in China (2017). Beijing: CIETAC.
Cohen, J (1966) Chinese mediation on the eve of modernisation. California Law Review 54, 12011226.
Daily of People's Court (2018) A comprehensive reform effort of people's courts to promote the pluralist dispute resolution mechanism, 14 March. Available at (accessed 26 November 2018).
Explanations on the Draft Arbitration Law of the PRC (1994) Delivered at the 8th Meeting of the 8th Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, 28 June. Available at (accessed 11 February2019).
Fan, Y (2017) The development and inspiration of the contemporary world pluralist dispute resolution mechanisms. China Applied Legal Science 3, 4864.
Fu, H (1992) Understanding people's mediation in post-Mao China. Journal of Chinese Law 6, 211246.
Fu, H and Cullen, R (2011) From mediatory to adjudicatory justice: the limits of civil justice reform in China. In Woo, MYK and Gallagher, ME (eds), Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2557.
Hilmer, SE (2009) Mediation in the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong (SAR). The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
Hu, S (2017) The China solution in the pluralist dispute resolution mechanism. China Applied Legal Science 3, 3747.
Hu, S (2018) Chinese trends in pluralist dispute resolution mechanism, People's Justice. Available at (accessed 8 May 2019).
Hu, S and Long, F (2016) Strategical arrangements and innovative measures in deepening reform of the mechanism for pluralist dispute resolution, China Adjudication. Available at (accessed 8 October 2016).
Huang, Y (1995) Research Note: Administrative monitoring in China. The China Quarterly 143, 828843.
Judicial Reform Leading Group (2014) Comprehensively promote the reform of Xinfang in relation to matters concerning law – an interview with the person-in-charge of the judicial reform leading group of the CPC. Available at (accessed 15 April 2019).
Legal Daily (2019) Ministry of justice sets out clear objectives for arbitration reform in the new age, 2 April. Available at (accessed 15 April 2019).
Li, L (2014) How to break the Xin Fang bu Xin Fa circle, China Youth Daily, 21 March. Available at (last accessed 15 April 2019).
Li, S (2016) To construct a pluralist dispute resolution system with Chinese characteristics, Daily of People's Court, 6 July. Available at (accessed 9 May 2019).
Li, S (2017) Speech at National Court Conference on Exchanging Experiences among Model Courts for Reform of the Mechanism for Pluralist Dispute Resolution, 16 February. Available at (accessed 6 May 2019).
Liang, Y (2017) Exploring the improvement of the Mechanism for Pluralist Dispute Resolution, China Legal Information Deamination Web, 18 October. Available at (accessed 9 May 2019).
Liu, L (2018) A brief examination of difficulties encountered by courts in the reform of pluralist dispute resolution mechanisms and suggestions for improvement, China Rule of Law, 24 March. Available at (accessed 3 May 2019).
Liu, M (2015) A summary of the reform of the mechanism for pluralist dispute resolution, Daily of People's Court, 25 December. Available at (accessed 26 May 2019).
Lubman, S (1967) Mao and mediation: politics and dispute resolution in communist China. California Law Review 55, 12841359.
Luo, H (1995) Using administrative litigation functions to promote the implementation of the Administrative Litigation Law. Administrative Law Review 4, 2–6.
Minzner, CF (2006) Xinfang: an alternative to formal Chinese legal institutions. Stanford Journal of International Law 42, 103195.
Mo, J (1997) Alternative dispute resolution. In Wang, C and Zhang, X (eds), Introduction to Chinese Law. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia, pp. 367407.
Party Report (2017) Delivered at the 19th National Congress of the CPC, 18 October. Available at (accessed 10 May 2019).
Peerenboom, R and He, X (n.d.) Dispute Resolution in China: Patterns, Causes, and Prognosis. Oxford: The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society and The Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford. Available at (accessed 15 September 2011).
People's Daily (2018) Why the socialism with Chinese characteristics is now entering into a new era, 19 January. Available at (accessed 20 January 2018).
Pi, C (1995) An important law that needs serious implementation. Administrative Law Review 4, 12–17.
Research Office of the Supreme People's Court (2010) Person-in-charge of the Research Office of the Supreme People's Court interviewed on the Certain Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Further Implementing the Principle of ‘Mediation as Priority and Combining Adjudication with Mediation’. Available at (last accessed 17 June 2011).
Supreme People's Court (2019) Judicial Reforms in Chinese Courts 2013–2018. Beijing: Press of People's Court.
Tang, W (2017) Historical significance and key points of the reform of the Mechanism for Pluralist Dispute Resolution, Daily of the People's Court, 15 February. Available at (last accessed 3 May 2019).
Tao, J (2004/2008) Arbitration Law and Practice in China. The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International.
Tian, Y (2015) Twenty years of arbitration in China. Available at (accessed 6 April 2017).
Vice-Minister of Justice (2010) An important method for dispute resolution – an interview with the Vice-Minister of Justice on the promulgation of the Law on People's Mediation, Xinhua News Agency, 6 September. Available at (accessed 8 June 2011).
Wang, ZJ and Chen, J (2019) Dispute Resolution in the People's Republic of China: The Evolving Institutions and Mechanisms. Leiden and London: Brill Nijhoff.
Work Report of the Supreme People's Court (2012) Delivered at the 2nd Session of the 13th National People's Congress, 12 March. Available at (accessed 19 May 2019).
Wu, Y (2009) On the functions and limitations of the ‘great mediation’, Beida China Law Information Centre. Available at (accessed 12 January 2019).
Xu, H (2012) The revision of the Civil Procedure Law and controversies therefrom. In Li, L (ed.), Report on Rule of Law Development in China (No 10). Beijing: Press of Social Science Documents. Available at (accessed 5 March 2019).
Xu, Q (1999) Arbitration in China: history, present and future, Cross Jurisdictions, 143–158. Available at (accessed 9 May 2019).
Zhang, S (1989) Administrative law science in new China. Journal of Zhongnan Institute of Political Science and Law 3, 1823.
Zheng, R (n.d.) ARD in PR China. Available at (accessed 18 March 2019).
Zhu, J (ed.) (2007) A Report on Legal Development in China: Data Bank and Assessment Criteria. Beijing: Renmin University Press.


From alternative dispute resolution to pluralist dispute resolution: towards an integrated dispute-resolution mechanism in China

  • Zhiqiong June Wang (a1) and Jianfu Chen (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.