Astor, H (2007) Mediator neutrality: making sense of theory and practice. Social and Legal Studies 16, 234–239.
Barendrecht, JM et al. (2009) Best Practices for an Affordable and Sustainable Dispute System: A Toolbox for Microjustice. TISCO Working Paper Series, Vol. 003/2009. Tilburg Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems (TISCO). Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1334619 (accessed 26 April 2020).
Barlow, A et al. (2017) Mapping Paths to Family Justice: Resolving Family Disputes in Neoliberal Times. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boulle, L and Teh, HH (2000) Mediation: Principles, Process, Practices. Singapore: Butterworth Asia.
Brazil, W (1999) Comparing structures for the delivery of ADR services: critical values and concerns. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 14, 715–811.
Brockner, J (2003) Unpacking country effects: on the need to operationalize the psychological determinants of cross-national differences. Research in Organizational Behavior 25, 333–367.
Brockner, J et al. (2001) Culture and procedural justice: the influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37, 300–315.
Cappelletti, M (1993) Alternative dispute resolution processes within the framework of the world-wide access-to-justice movement. Modern Law Review 56, 282–296.
Cappelletti, M and Garth, B (1978) Access to justice: the newest wave in the worldwide movement to make rights effective. Buffalo Law Review 27, 181–292.
Chua, E and Lim, G (2017) Development of mediation in Singapore. In McFadden, D and Lim, G (eds), Mediation in Singapore: A Practical Guide, 2nd edn.Singapore: Thomson Reuters, pp. 3–24.
Delgado, R et al. (2007) Fairness and formality: minimizing the risk of prejudice in ADR. Wisconsin Law Review 1369, 1359–1404.
Francesco, AM and Chen, ZX (2000) Cross Cultural Differences within a Single Culture: Power Distance as a Moderator of Participation–Outcome Relationship in the People’s Republic of China. Hong Kong: Business Research Centre, School of Business.
Hollander-Blumoff, R (2017) Fairness beyond the adversary system: procedural justice norms for legal negotiation. Fordham Law Review 85, 2081–2095.
Hyman, J and Love, L (2003) If Portia were a mediator: an inquiry into justice in mediation. Yale Clinical Law Review 9, 157–193.
Lee, J (2016) Culture and its importance in mediation. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 16, 317–340.
Lee, J and Teh, HH (eds) (2009) An Asian Perspective on Mediation. Singapore: Academy Publishing, Chapter 2 (pp. 21–42), Chapter 3 (pp. 54, 67–68).
Lim, D (2011) Islandwide curry event to promote integration, My Paper, 17 August 2011.
Low, J (2011) Promoting ethical practice in the mediation community. Asian Journal on Mediation 1, 20–31.
Low, J and Quek, D (2017) An overview of court mediation in the state courts of Singapore (updated by David Lim and James Leong). In McFadden, D and Lim, G (eds), Mediation in Singapore: A Practical Guide, 2nd edn.Singapore: Thomson Reuters, pp. 227–267.
Menkel-Meadow, C (1991) Pursuing settlement in an adversary culture: a tale of innovation co-opted or the law of ADR. Florida State University Law Review 19, 1–46.
Menkel-Meadow, C (1995) Whose dispute is it anyway? A philosophical and democratic defense of settlement (in some cases). Georgetown Law Journal 83, 2663–2696.
National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council (NADRAC) (2009) The Resolve to Resolve – Embracing ADR to Improve Access to Justice in the Federal Jurisdiction. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Phang, A (2006) From Foundation to Legacy: The Second Charter of Justice. Singapore: Academy Publishing.
Quek, C (2011) When neighbours disagree, TODAY Singapore, 8 August 2011.
Quek, Anderson D (2017) A coming of age for mediation in Singapore? Mediation Act 2016. Singapore Academy of Law Journal 29, 275–293.
Quek, Anderson D (2018) Ethical concerns in court-connected online dispute resolution. International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution 5, 20–38.
Quek, Anderson D and Knight, D (2017) Managing the inter-cultural dimensions of a mediation effectively – a proposed pre-mediation intake instrument. Australasian Journal of Dispute Resolution 28, 89–97.
Roberge, JF and Quek Anderson, D (2018) Judicial mediation: from debates to renewal. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 19, 613–651.
Sandefur, R (2019) Access to what? Daedalus, the Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Science 148, 49–55.
Straits Times, The (2011) Writer misunderstood mediation process: Ministry of Law, 23 August.
Stulberg, J (2005) Mediation and justice: what standards govern? Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 6, 213–245.
Tan, NT et al. (2000) ADR – current and future prospects. In Tan, NT and Lee-Partridge, JE (eds), Alternative Dispute Resolution in Business, Family and Community: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Singapore: Pagesetters Services.
Traum, L and Farkas, B (2017) The history and legacy of the pound conferences. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 18, 677–698.
Van de Bos, K (2013) Delineating a method to study cross-cultural differences with experimental control: the voice effect and countercultural contexts regarding power distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49, 624–634.
Waldman, E (1997) Identifying the role of social norms in mediation: a multi model approach. Hastings Law Journal 48, 727–733.
Waldman, E and Akin, Ojelabi L (2016) Mediators and substantive justice: a view from Rawls’ original position. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 30, 391–430.
Welsh, N (2012) The current transitional state of court-connected ADR. Marquette Law Review 95, 873–886.
Welsh, N (2016) Magistrate judges, settlement, and procedural justice. Nevada Law Journal 16, 983–1060.
Welsh, N (2017) Do you believe in magic: self-determination and procedural justice meet inequality in court-connected mediation. SMU Law Review 70, 721–762.
Woolf, Master of the Rolls (1996) Access to Justice: Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales. London: HM Office.
Yong, PH (former Chief Justice) (1996) Speech at the opening of the legal year 1996. In Hoo, Sheau P (ed.), Speeches and Judgments of Chief Justice Yong Pung How. Singapore: FT Law & Tax Asia Pacific.
Yong, PH (former Chief Justice) (1997a) Keynote address at the International Mediation Conference on 18 August 1997. In Hoo, Sheau P (ed.) Speeches and Judgments of Chief Justice Yong Pung How. Singapore: FT Law & Tax Asia Pacific.
Yong, PH (former Chief Justice) (1997b) Speech at the official opening of the Singapore Mediation Centre on 16 August 1997. In Hoo, Sheau P (ed.) Speeches and Judgments of Chief Justice Yong Pung How. Singapore: FT Law & Tax Asia Pacific.