Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Autonomy, vulnerability and capacity: a philosophical appraisal of the Mental Capacity Act

  • Catriona Mackenzie (a1) and Wendy Rogers (a2)

Abstract

The UK Mental Capacity Act provides an important legislative framework for protecting persons who are vulnerable, by virtue of partial or total lack of capacity, from abuse, coercion, exploitation, disrespect or unwarranted intrusions on their privacy and liberty. In this article we argue, however, that in order to effectively implement the Act's governing principles and promote the autonomy of persons whose capacities are impaired, health and social welfare professionals must go beyond a primarily cognitive approach to capacity assessment and refer to a range of more demanding autonomy conditions relating to authenticity, diachronic coherence and consistency, accountability to others, and affective attitudes towards oneself. We suggest that these conditions are in fact implicit in the guidelines, scenarios and practical advice contained in the Act's accompanying Code of Practice. To ground our analysis, we discuss two cases of end-of-life decision-making, and consider how these cases might have been assessed had the Mental Capacity Act been applied. We also address the question of whether the conditions for autonomy we identify raise the bar too high to be met by persons who are vulnerable because their capacity is partially compromised.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Anderson, Joel and Honneth, Axel (2005) ‘Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice’, in Christman, John and Anderson, Joel (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 127–49.
Beauchamp, Tom and Childress, James F. (2008) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th edn.New York: Oxford University Press.
Benson, Paul (1994) ‘Free Agency and Self-Worth’, Journal of Philosophy 91: 650–68.
Benson, Paul (2005a) ‘Taking Ownership: Authority and Voice in Autonomous Agency’, in Christman, John and Anderson, Joel (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101126.
Benson, Paul (2005b) ‘Feminist Intuitions and the Normative Substance of Autonomy’, in Taylor, James Stacey (ed.), Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 124–42.
Bratman, Michael (2007) Structures of Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Christman, John (2005) ‘Autonomy, Self-knowledge and Liberal Legitimacy’, in Christman, John and Anderson, Joel (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 330–57.
Christman, John (2009) The Politics of Persons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Department for Constitutional Affairs (2007) Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice. Norwich: Stationery Office.
Department of Health (2000) No Secrets: Guidance on Developing and Implementing Multi-agency Policies and Procedures to Protect Vulnerable Adults from Abuse. London: Home Office.
Dunn, Michael C., Clare, Isabel C. H. and Holland, Anthony J. (2008) ‘To Empower or to Protect? Constructing the ‘Vulnerable Adult’ in English Law and Public Policy’, Legal Studies 28(2): 234–53.
Dworkin, Gerald (1988) The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodin, Robert (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Govier, Trudy (1993) ‘Self-Trust, Autonomy and Self-Esteem’, Hypatia 8: 99120.
Korsgaard, Christine (1996) The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mackenzie, Catriona (2008) ‘Relational Autonomy, Normative Authority and Perfectionism’, Journal of Social Philosophy 39(4): 512–33.
Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie (2000a) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie (2000b) ‘Introduction: Autonomy Refigured’, In Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie (eds), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press, 331.
McLeod, Carolyn (2002) Self-trust and Reproductive Autonomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
National Assembly for Wales (2000) In Safe Hands: Implementing Adult Protection Procedures in Wales. Guidance Issued by the National Assembly for Wales under s 7 of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970. Cardiff: National Assembly for Wales.
O'Neill, Onora (2002) Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, Wendy, Mackenzie, Catriona and Dodds, Susan (2012) ‘Why Bioethics Needs a Concept of Vulnerability’, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5(2): 1138.
Taylor, Charles (1989) Sources of the Self. The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles (1991) ‘The Dialogical Self’, in Hiley, David R., Bohman, James and Shusterman, Richard (eds), The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 304314.
Westlund, Andrea (2009) ‘Rethinking Relational Autonomy’, Hypatia 24(4): 2649.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Law in Context
  • ISSN: 1744-5523
  • EISSN: 1744-5531
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed