Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-jxh9h Total loading time: 0.349 Render date: 2021-04-16T18:51:38.939Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Reversing roles: bringing men into the frame

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2014

Sandra Fredman
Affiliation:
Sandra Fredman FBA QC (hon), Rhodes Professor of the Laws of the British Commonwealth and the United States, Pembroke College, Oxford University, and Director of the Oxford Human Rights Hub. Email: Sandra.fredman@law.ox.ac.uk.
Corresponding

Abstract

The attempt to secure maternity rights has been a major focus of decades of campaigning for women's equality. However, it is of concern that maternity rights might reinforce women's responsibility for childcare. This paper considers how we bring men back into the frame, through a critical assessment of the contrasting approaches in Europe and the US to claims by fathers for parenting rights. It is argued that the goal of equal participation of women in the workplace needs to be matched by equal participation of men in the home. This is only possible if the conception of equality is shaped by a conscious and explicit commitment to the social value of parenthood. Substantive equality can only be genuinely furthered if pregnancy and parenthood are appropriately distinguished. Whereas pregnancy is unique and should be treated as such, a true application of substantive equality requires a ‘levelling up’ option, extending women's parenting rights to fathers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Caracciolo di Torella, Eugenia (2007) ‘New Labour New Dads – the Impact of Family Friendly Legislation on Fathers’, Industrial Law Journal 36: 318328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caracciolo di Torella, Eugenia and Masselot, Annick (2009) Reconciling Work and Family Life in EU Law and Policy. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union (2010) ‘Press Release, 3053rd Council Meeting: Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs’, 17323/1/10 REV 1-PRESSE 331-PR CO 43, online: <http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/lsa/118254.pd>>Google Scholar
EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) (2012a) ‘Written Testimony of Dr Stephen Benard, Professor of Sociology, Indiana University’, Meeting of February 15, 2012 – Unlawful Discrimination Against Pregnant Workers and Workers with Caregiving Responsibilities, online: <http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/2-15-12/benard.cfm>..>Google Scholar
EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) (2012b) ‘Written Testimony of Peggy Mastroianni Legal Counsel, EEOC’, Meeting of February 15, 2012 – Unlawful Discrimination Against Pregnant Workers and Workers with Caregiving Responsibilities, online: <http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/meetings/2-15-12/mastroianni.cfm#fn43>..>Google Scholar
Equal Opportunities Commission (2005) ‘Greater Expectations: Summary Final Report: EOC's Investigation into Pregnancy Discrimination’, online: <http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/eoc_pregnancygfi_summary_report.pdf>..>Google Scholar
European Parliament (2009) ‘Report on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Council Directive 92/85/EEC on the Introduction of Measures to Encourage Improvements in the Safety and Health at Work of Pregnant Workers and Workers Who Have Recently Given Birth or Are Breastfeeding’ (COM(2008)0637 – C6-0340/2008 – 2008/0193(COD))’ A6-0267/2009), online: <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A6-2009-0267+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN>..>Google Scholar
European Parliament (2012) ‘Parliamentary Questions 20 June 2012: Questions for Written Answer to the Council Rule 117 Angelika Werthmann (NI) Subject Maternity Leave in Europe’, online: <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+E-2012-006097+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN>..>Google Scholar
Fredman, Sandra (1994) ‘A Difference with Distinction: Pregnancy and Parenthood Reassessed’, Law Quarterly Review 110: 106123.Google Scholar
Fredman, Sandra (1997) Women and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ILO (International Labour Organisation) (2013) ‘Maternity Protection’, online: <http://www.ilo.org/travail/areasofwork/maternity-protection/lang--en/index.htm>..>Google Scholar
James, Grace (2009) The Legal Regulation of Pregnancy and Parenting in the Labour Market. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
James, Grace (2013) ‘Forgotten Children: Work–Family Reconciliation in the EU’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 34: 363379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossek, Ellen, Lewis, Suzan and Hammer, Leslie (2010) ‘Work Family Initiatives and Organisation Change: Mixed Messages in Moving from the mmargins to the Mainstream’, Human Relations 63: 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jane, Knijn, Trudie, Martin, Claude and Ostner, Ilona (2008) ‘Patterns of Development in Work/Family Reconciliation Policies for Parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s’, Social Politics 15: 261286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Vaisvidovsky, Nadav (2013) ‘Fathers at a Crossroads: The Combined Effect of Organizational and Cultural Factors on the Making of Gender-Related Policy’, Social Politics 20: 407429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Peggie R. (2001–2002) ‘Parental Status in Employment Discrimination: A Wrong in Need of a Right?’, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 35: 569620.Google Scholar
Suk, Julie (2012) ‘Antidiscrimination to Equality: Stereotypes and the Life Cycle in the United States and Europe’, American Journal of Comparative Law 75: 7799.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 114
Total number of PDF views: 591 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Reversing roles: bringing men into the frame
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Reversing roles: bringing men into the frame
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Reversing roles: bringing men into the frame
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *