Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-nbrzn Total loading time: 0.619 Render date: 2021-04-15T15:28:06.099Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Respect for human dignity as ‘substantive basic norm’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2014

Mary Neal
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

The idea of ‘human dignity’ is, notoriously, as ambiguous as it is compelling. Notwithstanding the absence of any clear or settled definition of human dignity, either in the abstract or in terms of what it means in practice, it is an idea which takes pride of place in international legal documents, in judicial reasoning, and in scholarship across a range of disciplines, where it seems, particularly in recent years, to have become the focus for an explosion of academic interest and an accompanying proliferation of literature. Much of the existing literature attempts to uncover the meaning, or multiple meanings, of ‘human dignity’, focusing on the uncertainty surrounding the substance or content of the idea and trying to compose a catalogue of use-types. In this paper, my primary aim will be to address another type of uncertainty, namely uncertainty about the role, function or status within legal frameworks of the ‘dignity norm’ – the norm requiring respect for human dignity. I want to explore several possibilities: first, that the dignity norm is simply a proxy for respect for autonomy; second, that it is a right in the sense that we can speak of a specific ‘right to have dignity respected’; and third, that it is a legal principle. Having problematised each of these in turn, I will contend that the function of the dignity norm is best captured by describing it as the ‘substantive basic norm’ of the legal systems wherein it appears.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Alexy, Robert (2000) ‘On the Structure of Legal Principles’, Ratio Juris 13(3): 294304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexy, Robert (2002) A Theory of Constitutional Rights (trans. Rivers, Julian). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert (2010) ‘The Dual Nature of Law’, Ratio Juris 23(2): 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andorno, Roberto (2010) ‘Dignité humaine, droits de l'homme et bioethique: quel rapport?’, International Journal of Bioethics 21(4): 5159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andorno, Roberto (2011) ‘The Dual Role of Human Dignity in Bioethics’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (published online 16 December 2011).Google Scholar
Barroso, Luís R. (2012) ‘Here, There and Everywhere: Human Dignity in Contemporary Law and in the Transnational Discourse’, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 35(2): 331–93.Google Scholar
Dupré, Catherine (2009) ‘Unlocking Human Dignity: Towards a Theory for the 21st Century’, European Human Rights Law Review 2: 190206.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1978) Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1986) Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1993) Life's Dominion: An Argument About Abortion and Euthanasia. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (2006) Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for a New Political Debate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (2011) Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Enders, Christoph (2010) ‘The Right to Have Rights: The Concept of Human Dignity in German Basic Law’, Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) 2(1): 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Charles (2011) Human Dignity in Bioethics and Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon (1964) The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gaylin, Willard (1984) ‘In Defense of the Dignity of Being Human’, Hastings Center Report 14(4): 1822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gewirth, Alan (1978) Reason and Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Glensy, Rex (2011) ‘The Right To Dignity’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 43(1): 65142.Google Scholar
Griffin, James (2009) On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Günther, Klaus (1988) Der Sinn für Angemessenheit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hale, Brenda (2009) ‘Dignity’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 31(2): 101108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, George (1997) Dignity and Vulnerability: Strength and Quality of Character. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Hans M. (2010) ‘Inclusive and Relevant Language: The Use of the Concepts of Autonomy, Dignity and Vulnerability in Different Contexts’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13: 203213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennette-Vauchez, Stéphanie (2007) ‘When Ambivalent Principles Prevail: Leads for Explaining Western Legal Orders' Infatuation with the Human Dignity Principle’, Legal Ethics 10: 193. Online: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1093274>.Google Scholar
Hennette-Vauchez, Stéphanie (2011) ‘A Human Dignitas? Remnants of the Ancient Legal Concept in Contemporary Dignity Jurisprudence’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 9(1): 3257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias, Teresa (2001) ‘Bedrock Truths and the Dignity of the Individual’, Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 4(1): 114–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanović, Miodrag (2013) ‘Legal Validity and Human Dignity: On Radbruch's Formula’, in Brugger, Winfried and Kirste, Stephan (eds), Human Dignity as a Foundation of Law: Proceedings of the Special Workshop held at the 24th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Beijing, 2009. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 145–67.Google Scholar
Killmister, Suzy (2010) ‘Dignity: Not Such a Useless Concept’, Journal of Medical Ethics 36: 160–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Eckart (2002) ‘Human Dignity in German Law’, in Kretzmer, David and Klein, Eckart (eds), The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 145–60.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz (2003) ‘The Dignity Clause of the Montana Constitution: May Foreign Jurisprudence Lead the Way to an Expanded Interpretation?’, Montana Law Review 64: 133–55.Google Scholar
Knoepffler, Nicholas and O'Malley, Martin (2010) ‘Human Dignity: Regulative Principle and Absolute Value’, International Journal of Bioethics 21(3): 6376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leckey, Robert (2005) ‘Embodied Dignity’, Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 5(1): 6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie (eds) (2000) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macklin, Ruth (2003) ‘Dignity is a Useless Concept’, British Medical Journal 327: 1419–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maier, Andreas (2010) ‘Torture: How Denying Moral Standing Violates Human Dignity’, in Kaufmann, Paulus, Kuch, Hannes, Neuhäuser, Christian and Webster, Elaine (eds), Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization: Human Dignity Violated. London: Springer, 101117.Google Scholar
Mamberti, Dominique (Archbishop) (2012) Statement at the 67th Ordinary Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations on the Rule of Law at the National and International Levels, UN Headquarters, New York, Monday 24 September 2012. Available at: <http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/secretariat_state/2012/documents/rc_seg-st_20120924_rule-of-law_en.html>..>Google Scholar
Mattson, David and Clark, Susan (2011) ‘Human Dignity in Concept and Practice’, Policy Sciences 44: 303319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccrudden, Christopher (2008) ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law 19(4): 655724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munby, James (2011) ‘Foreword’, in Foster, Charles, Human Dignity in Bioethics and Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, xiiixvi.Google Scholar
Muniz, Joaquín R.-Toubes (1997) ‘Legal Principles and Legal Theory’, Ratio Juris 10(3): 267–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naske, Nina and Nolte, Georg (2007) ‘Legislative Authorization to Shoot Down Aircraft Abducted by Terrorists if Innocent Passengers Are On Board – Incompatibility with Human Dignity as Guaranteed by Article 1(1) of the German Constitution’, American Journal of International Law 101(2): 466–71.Google Scholar
Neal, Mary (2012a) ‘Dignity, Law and Language-Games’, International Journal of the Semiotics of Law 25(1): 107122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, Mary (2012b) ‘“Not Gods But Animals”: Human Dignity and Vulnerable Subjecthood’, Liverpool Law Review 33: 177200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer (1989) ‘Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts and Possibilities’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1: 736.Google Scholar
Nordenfeld, Lennart (2004) ‘The Varieties of Dignity’, Health Care Analysis 12(2): 6981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Sophie (2010) ‘Dehumanization: Perceiving the Body as (In)Human’, in Kaufmann, Paulus, Kuch, Hannes, Neuhäuser, Christian and Webster, Elaine (eds), Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization: Human Dignity Violated. London: Springer, 8597.Google Scholar
O'Mahony, Conor (2012a) ‘There Is No Such Thing as a Right to Dignity’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 10(2): 551–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Mahony, Conor (2012b) ‘There Is No Such Thing as a Right to Dignity: A Rejoinder to Emily Kidd White’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 10(2): 585–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven (2008) ‘The Stupidity of Dignity’, The New Republic. Available at: <http://www.tnr.com/article/the-stupidity-dignity>..>Google Scholar
Pollmann, Arnd (2011) ‘Embodied Self-Respect and the Fragility of Human Dignity: A Human Rights Approach’, in Kaufmann, Paulus, Kuch, Hannes, Neuhäuser, Christian and Webster, Elaine (eds), Humiliation, Degradation, Dehumanization: Human Dignity Violated. London: Springer, 243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poscher, Ralf (2009) ‘Insights, Errors, and Self-Misconceptions of the Theory of Principles’, Ratio Juris 22(4): 425–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav (2006a) ‘Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946)’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26(1): 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav (2006b) ‘Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26(1): 1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1972) ‘Legal Principles and the Limits of Law’, Yale Law Journal 81(5): 823–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendtorff, Jacob D. (2002) ‘Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw: Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability – Towards a Foundation of Bioethics and Biolaw’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5: 235–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rütsche, Bernhard (2010) ‘The Role of Human Dignity in the Swiss Legal System: Arguing for a Dualistic Notion of Human Dignity’, International Journal of Bioethics 21(4): 8392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schachter, Oscar (1983) ‘Human Dignity as a Normative Concept’, American Journal of International Law 77(4): 848–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Doris (2012) ‘Human Dignity and Human Rights: An Appeal to Separate the Conjoined Twins’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15: 323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Jürgen (2002) ‘Human Dignity as a Regulative Instrument for Human Genome Research’, in Mazzoni, Cosimo M. (ed.), Ethics and Law in Biological Research. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 3545.Google Scholar
Smith, Stephen W. (2008) ‘Precautionary Reasoning in Determining Moral Worth’, in Freeman, Michael (ed.), Law and Bioethics (Current Legal Issues Vol. 11). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass (1996) ‘On the Expressive Function of Law’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144(5): 2021–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy (1997) ‘The Need for Legal Principles’, Iowa Law Review 82(3): 857–66.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy (2005) ‘Torture and Positive Law: Jurisprudence for the White House’, Columbia Law Review 105(6): 1681–750.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy (2008) ‘The Dignity of Groups’, Acta Juridica, 2008(1): 6690.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy (2012a) Dignity, Rank and Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy (2012b) ‘How Law Protects Dignity’, Cambridge Law Journal 71(1): 200222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy (2013) ‘Is Dignity the Foundation of Human Rights?’, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 12–73. Available at: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2196074>..>Google Scholar
White, Emily K. (2012) ‘There Is No Such Thing as a Right to Dignity: A Reply to Conor O'Mahony’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 10(2): 575–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 50
Total number of PDF views: 237 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Respect for human dignity as ‘substantive basic norm’
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Respect for human dignity as ‘substantive basic norm’
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Respect for human dignity as ‘substantive basic norm’
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *