Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2014
The introduction of the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative in 1996 established landmark legal and policy innovations both in the regulatory landscape of sovereign debt and in the framework of international development finance. As the HIPC framework draws to a close, this paper reviews the impact of this initiative on the regulation of sovereign debt, in particular the governance of third world debt. The paper considers the implications of the initiative's explicit link between debt restructuring and development policy and its incorporation of non-traditional normative values, such as poverty reduction and participatory development, into the legal and political discourse of sovereign debt. The paper argues that while the changes which brought about the HIPC initiative have led to a number of key initiatives to reform the governance of third world debt, they have also had the contradictory effect of reinforcing the core disciplinary discourses and pre-existing practices of the sovereign debt regime.
While the term ‘third world’ has been discarded in various quarters in favour of the more geographically attributed ‘north/south’ terminology, many scholars and activists from developing countries have retained its usage as a continuing form of resistance to attempts to disperse the collective voice and organising unity of third world states and third world peoples (see Chimni, 2003). The term is used in this paper in this spirit.
Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.