Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:17:29.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influences of Labour Participation Among Persons With Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2012

Henry G. Harder*
Affiliation:
University of Northern British Columbia, Canada
Joshua A. Rash
Affiliation:
University of Northern British Columbia, Canada
Sara Nelson
Affiliation:
University of Northern British Columbia, Canada
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Henry G. Harder, Chair, Health Science Programs, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, CanadaV2N 4Z9. E-mail: harderh@unbc.ca

Abstract

A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the individual, organisation, societal, and legal influences of labour participation among individuals with a disability. Methods: Nine databases were searched, for peer-reviewed studies of individual, organisation, societal, and legal influences among disabled populations published between 1990 and 2010.

Results: Of a total of 809 papers initially selected, only 46 studies were deemed to be of sufficient quality to be included in the review. Conclusions: Numerous studies have examined labour participation among persons with physical disabilities, some among persons with chronic disabilities, and few among persons with mental disabilities. Strong evidence was found for individual and organisation influences of labour participation among persons with physical disabilities in particular pain, catastrophising, job strain, and support. Only individual influences provided strong evidence among persons with chronic disabilities and no influences provided strong evidence among those with mental disabilities. The results are presented along with methodological weaknesses and future recommendations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abenhaim, M., & Suissa, S. (1987). Importance and economic burden of occupational back pain: A study of 2,500 cases representative of Quebec. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 29, 670674.Google Scholar
Adams, H., Ellis, T., Stanish, W.D., & Sullivan, M.J. (2007). Psychosocial factors related to return to work following rehabilitation of whiplash injuries. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17 (2), 305315.Google Scholar
Anema, J.R., Schellart, A.J.M., Cassidy, J.D., Loisel, P., Veerman, T.J., & van der Beek, A.J. (2009). Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19 (4), 419426.Google Scholar
Anema, J.R., Steenstra, I.A., Urlings, I.J., Bongers, P.M., de Vroome, E.M., & van Mechelen, W. (2003). Participatory ergonomics as a return-to-work intervention: a future challenge? American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 44 (3), 273281.Google Scholar
Anema, J.R., Van Der Giezen, A.M., Buijs, P.C., & Van Mechelen, W. (2002). Ineffective disability management by doctors is an obstacle for return-to-work: a cohort study on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months. Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 59 (11), 729733.Google Scholar
Arango-Lasprilla, J., Ketchum, J.M., Stevens, L.F., Balcazar, F., Wehman, P., Forster, L., & Hsu, N. (2009). Ethnicity/racial differences in employment outcomes following spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 24 (1), 3746.Google Scholar
Baltov, P., Cote, J., Truchon, M., & Feldman, D.E. (2008). Psychosocial and socio-demographic factors associated with outcomes for patients undergoing rehabilitation for chronic whiplash associated disorders: a pilot study. Disability & Rehabilitation, 30 (25), 19471955.Google Scholar
Banks, J., Kapteyn, A., Smith, J.P., & Soest, A.V. (2004). International comparisons of work disability. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1118. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=533807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartys, S., Burton, K., & Main, C. (2005). A prospective study of psychosocial risk factors and absence due to musculoskeletal disorders — implications for occupational screening. Occupational Medicine, 55 (5), 375379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braden, J.B., Zhang, L., Zimmerman, F.J., & Sullivan, M.D. (2008). Employment outcomes of persons with a mental disorder and comorbid chronic pain. Psychiatric Services, 59 (8), 878885.Google Scholar
Briss, P.A., Zaza, S., Pappaioanou, M., Fielding, J., Wright-De-Aguero, L., Truman, B.I., . . . Harris, J.R. (2000). Developing an evidence based guide to community preventive services — Methods. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18, 3543.Google Scholar
Bronfort, G., Haas, M., Evans, R.L., & Bouter, L.M. (2004). Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis. The Spine Journal, 4, 335356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, B.S., Buckley, D., Ferraro, R., Rordorf, G., & Ogilvy, C.S. (2000). Factors associated with reintegration to normal living after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery, 46 (6), 13261333Google Scholar
Chibnall, J.T., Tait, R.C. (2009). Long-term adjustment to work-related low back pain: associations with socio-demographics, claim processes, and post-settlement adjustment. Pain Medicine, 10 (8), 13781388.Google Scholar
Chinn, S. (2000). A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 19 (22), 31273131.Google Scholar
De Kesel, R., Donceel, P., & De Smet, L. (2008). Factors influencing return to work after surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Occupational Medicine (Oxford), 58 (3), 187190.Google Scholar
Didie, E.R., Menard, W., Stern, A.P., & Phillips, K.A. (2008). Occupational functioning and impairment in adults with body dysmorphic disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 49 (6), 561569.Google Scholar
Dutta, A., Gervey, R., Chan, F., Chou, C. & Ditchman, N. (2008). Vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes for people with disabilities: A United States study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18 (4), 326334.Google Scholar
Dyster-Aas, J., Kildal, M., Willebrand, M., Gerdin, B., & Ekselius, L. (2004). Work status and burn specific health after work-related burn injury. Burns, 30 (8), 839842.Google Scholar
Feuerstein, M., Berkowitz, S.M., Haufler, A.J., Lopez, M.S. & Huang, G.D. (2001). Working with lowback pain: Workplace and individual psychosocial determinants of limited duty and lost time. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 40, 627638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FowlerW.M., Jr. W.M., Jr., Abresch, R.T., Koch, T.R., Brewer, M.L., Bowden, R.K., & Wanlass, R.L. (1997). Employment profiles in neuromuscular diseases. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 76 (1), 2637.Google Scholar
Franche, R.L., Frank, J., & Krause, N. (2005). Prediction of occupational disability: Models, factors, and outcomes. In Schultz, I.Z. & Gatchel, R.J. (Eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: early risk identification, intervention, and prevention (pp. 93116). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Friedman, H. (1968). Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid estimation. Psychological Bulletin, 70 (4), 245251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, J.M., George, S.Z. (2002). Identifying psychosocial variables in patients with acute work-related low back pain: the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs. Physical Therapy, 82 (10), 973983.Google Scholar
Gauthier, N., Sullivan, M.J., Adams, H., Stanish, W.D., Thibault, P. (2006). Investigating risk factors for chronicity: the importance of distinguishing between return-to-work status and self-report measures of disability. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 48 (3), 312318.Google Scholar
Glozier, N., Hackett, M.L., Parag, V., & Anderson, C.S. (2008). The influence of psychiatric morbidity on return to paid work after stroke in younger adults: the Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study, 2002 to 2003. Stroke, 39 (5), 15261532.Google Scholar
Henry, A.D., Banks, S., Clark, R., & Himmelstein, J. (2007). Mobility limitations negatively impact work outcomes among Medicaid enrollees with disabilities. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 17 (3), 355369.Google Scholar
Heymans, M.W., Anema, J.R., van Buuren, S., Knol, D.L., van Mechelen, W., de Vet, H.C. (2009). Return to work in a cohort of low back pain patients: development and validation of a clinical prediction rule. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19 (2), 155165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, P.O., Mattsson, B., Marklund, S., & Wimo, A. (2001). The impact of psychosocial ‘markers’ on the outcome of rehabilitation. Disability & Rehabilitation, 23 (10), 430–435.Google Scholar
Kapoor, S., Shaw, W.S., Pransky, G., Patterson, W. (2006). Initial patient and clinician expectations of return to work after acute onset of work-related low back pain. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 48 (11), 11731180.Google Scholar
Katz, J.N., Keller, R.B., Fossel, A.H., Punnett, L., Bessette, L., Simmons, B.P., Mooney, N. (1997). Predictors of return to work following carpal tunnel release. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 31 (1), 8591.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaye, H.S. (2009). Stuck at the bottom rung: Occupational characteristics of workers with disabilities. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 19 (2), 115128.Google Scholar
Kool, J.P., Oesch, P.R., & de Bie, R.A. (2002). Predictive tests for non-return to work in patients with chronic low back pain. European Spine Journal, 11 (3), 258266.Google Scholar
Krause, N., Dasinger, L.K., Deegan, L.J., Rudolph, L., & Brand, R.J. (2001). Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 40 (4), 374392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marois, E., & Durand, M.J. (2009). Does participation in interdisciplinary work rehabilitation programme influence return to work obstacles and predictive factors? Disability & Rehabilitation, 31 (12), 9941007.Google Scholar
Mayer, T., Gatchel, R.J., & Evans, T. (2001). Effect of age on outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation for chronic disabling spinal disorders. Spine, 26 (12), 13781384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odegard, S., Finset, A., Kvien, T.K., Mowinckel, P., & Uhlig, T. (2005). Work disability in rheumatoid arthritis is predicted by physical and psychological health status: A 7-year study from the Oslo RA register. Scandanavian Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 441447.Google Scholar
Ownsworth, T., & Shum, D. (2008). Relationship between executive functions and productivity outcomes following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation: An International, Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(7), 531-540.Google Scholar
Palmer, K.T., Milne, P., Poole, J., Cooper, C., & Coggon, D. (2005). Employment characteristics and job loss in patients awaiting surgery on the hip or knee. Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 62 (1), 5457.Google Scholar
Pilling, D.S. (2002). Early employment careers of people with disabilities in the National Child Development Study. Work, 18 (1), 7587.Google Scholar
Post, R.B., van der Sluis, C.K., & Ten Duis, H.J. (2006). Return to work and quality of life in severely injured patients. Disability & Rehabilitation, 28 (22), 13991404.Google Scholar
Roessler, R.T., Rumrill, P.D., & Fitzgerald, S.M. (2004). Predictors of employment status for people with multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 47 (2), 96103.Google Scholar
Rosenheck, R., Leslie, D., Keefe, R., McEvoy, J., Swartz, M., Perkins, D., . . . CATIE Study Investigators Group. (2006). Barriers to employment for people with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163 (3), 411417.Google Scholar
Sahota, A., Zaghla, H., Adkins, R., Ramji, A., Lewis, S., Moser, J., . . . Fong, T.L. (2006). Predictors of employment after liver transplantation. Clinical Transplantation, 20 (4), 490495.Google Scholar
Salkever, D.S., Shinogle, J.A., & Goldman, H. (2003). Return to work and claim duration for workers with long-term mental disabilities: impacts of mental health coverage, fringe benefits, and disability management. Mental Health Services Research, 5 (3), 173186.Google Scholar
Sarda, J., Nicholas, M.K., Asghari, A. & Pimenta, C.A. (2009). The contribution of self-efficacy and depression to disability and work status in chronic pain patients: a comparison between Australian and Brazilian samples. European Journal of Pain: EJP, 13 (2), 189195.Google Scholar
Slavin, R.E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Research, 15, 511.Google Scholar
Smith, M.M., Arnett, P.A., Smith, Megan, M., & Arnett, P.A. (2005). Factors related to employment status changes in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 11 (5), 602609.Google Scholar
Slavin, R.E. (1995). Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 918.Google Scholar
Soucy, I., Truchon, M., & Cote, D. (2006). Work-related factors contributing to chronic disability in low back pain. Work, 26 (3), 313326.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M.J., Adams, H., Rhodenizer, T., & Stanish, W.D. (2006). A psychosocial risk factor–targeted intervention for the prevention of chronic pain and disability following whiplash injury. Physical Therapy, 86 (1), 818.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M.J., Ward, L.C., Tripp, D., French, D.J., Adams, H., & Stanish, W.D. (2005). Secondary prevention of work disability: Community-based psychosocial intervention for musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15 (3), 377392.Google Scholar
Tompa, E., Oliveira, C., Dolinschi, R., & Irvin, E. (2008). A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18, 1626.Google Scholar
Turner, J.A., Franklin, G., Fulton-Kehoe, D., Sheppard, L., Stover, B., Wu, R., . . . Wickizer, T.M. (2008). ISSLS prize winner: early predictors of chronic work disability: A prospective, population-based study of workers with back injuries. Spine, 33 (25), 28092818.Google Scholar
van der Geizen, A.M., Bouter, L.N. & Nijhuis, F.J.N. (2000). Predictors of return-to-work of low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4months. Pain, 87, 287294.Google Scholar
van Duijn, M., Lotters, F., & Burdorf, A. (2005). Influence of modified work on return to work for employees on sick leave due to musculoskeletal complaints. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37 (3), 172179.Google Scholar
Vlaeyen, J.W., & Linton, S.J. (2000). Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A state of the art. Pain, 85, 317332.Google Scholar
Von Korff, M., & Simon, G. (1996). The relationship between pain and depression. British Journal of Psychiatry (Suppl.), 101–108.Google Scholar
Waddell, G., Burton, A.K., & Main, C.J. (2003). Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work: A conceptual and scientific review. London, England: The Royal Society of Medicine Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, C.C., Danczyk-Hawley, C., & Reid, C.A. (2000). The progression of employees with mental disorders through disability benefits systems. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 15 (1), 1729.Google Scholar
Wolf, F.M. (1986). Meta-analysis: quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar