Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:05:27.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Approaches to Occupational Rehabilitation and Return to Work in Four Jurisdictions: A Cross-National Analysis From the Perspective of the ISSA Guidelines on Return to Work and Reintegration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2017

Donal McAnaney  and
Richard Wynne
Donal McAnaney*
Affiliation:
Pacific Coast University for Workplace Health Sciences, Canada
Richard Wynne
Affiliation:
Work Research Centre, Ireland
*
Address for correspondence: Donal McAnaney, Chair of the International Research Committee, Pacific Coast University for Workplace Health Sciences, Port Alberni, BC, Canada. Email: donalmcananey@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The guidelines published by the International Social Security Association, ISSA Guidelines: Return to Work and Reintegration, provide a policy imperative towards early intervention for people with nonoccupational health conditions at risk of exiting the workforce and moving to disability dependency. Socioeconomic and fiscal imperatives have been demonstrated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) review on sickness, disability and work (OECD, 2010), and by an accumulating evidence base for effectiveness. This study explored how social protection agencies are responding in terms of employment rehabilitation services for employed people with acquired disabilities. Specifically, this study reviewed job retention and return processes for workers with nonoccupational health conditions from the perspective of the ISSA guidelines in four jurisdictions with differing system frameworks. The methods used included a review of relevant literature and web resources and gathering detailed system descriptions from national respondents. Although the jurisdictions differed in the concepts used, service context, the structure of welfare systems and eligibility criteria, there was evidence of an acknowledgement of the needs of employed people with disabilities. This was not, however, consistently reflected in procedures, processes or outcome measurements. While some promising characteristics were identified, there was substantial room for improvement in the job retention and return to work strategies of the relevant agencies in all four jurisdictions. It was concluded that the deployment of the ISSA Guidelines: Return to Work and Reintegration, published in 2013, had yet to make a substantial impact on services and approaches in the domain of nonoccupational health conditions in these jurisdictions.

Keywords

return to workjob retentionnonoccupational health conditionsoccupational rehabilitationsocial protectionearly intervention
Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Disability Management , Volume 12 , 2017 , e2
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akabas, S.H., Gates, L.B., & Galvin, D.E. (1992). Disability management: A complete system to reduce costs, increase productivity, meet employee needs, and ensure legal compliance. New York, NY: American Management Association.Google Scholar
Allaire, S.H., Niu, J.B., & LaValley, M.P. (2005). Employment and satisfaction outcomes from a job retention intervention delivered to persons with chronic diseases. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 48 (2), 100–109.Google Scholar
Angeloni, S. (2013, October-December). Integrated disability management: An interdisciplinary and holistic approach. SAGE Open. doi: 10.1177/2158244013510303 Google Scholar
Arnetz, B.B., Sjogren, B., Rydehn, B., & Meisel, R. (2003). Early workplace intervention for employees with musculoskeletal-related absenteeism: a prospective controlled intervention study. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 45 (5), 499–506.Google Scholar
Bernhard, D., MacEachen, E., & Lippel, K. (2010). Disability management experts and the impact of jurisdiction on practice: an Ontario example. International Journal of Social Security and Workers Compensation, 2 (1). Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/IntJlSSWC/2010/2.html Google Scholar
Brewer, L. & Comyn, P. (2015). Integrating core work skills into TVET systems: Six country case studies. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organisation.Google Scholar
Casey, P. & Cameron, I. (2014). Principles of best practice in occupational rehabilitation for AIA Australia. Melbourne: AIA Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aia.com.au/en/resources/3b9ba88044c4d35380b1f40af27d2d40/Occ_rehab_best_practice_framework_0714.pdf Google Scholar
Central Statistics Office. (2002). Quarterly National Household Survey: Disability in the Labour Force Second Quarter 2002. Dublin, Ireland: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/labourmarket/2002/qnhs_moduleondisabilityinthelabourforceqtr22002.pdf Google Scholar
Chamberlain, M.A, Fialka-Moser, V., Schüldt-Ekholm, K., O'Connor, R. J., Herceg, M., & Ekholm, J. (2009) Vocational rehabilitation: An educational review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41, 856–869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, F., Reid, C., Kaskel, L., Roldan, G., Rahimi, M., & Mpofu, E. (1997). Vocational assessment and evaluation of people with disabilities. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 8 (2), 311–325.Google Scholar
Dean, D., Pepper, J., & Schmidt, R. (2014). State vocational rehabilitation programs and federal disability insurance: An analysis of Virginia's vocational rehabilitation program. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 3 (7), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Social Services. (2014). Evaluation of disability employment services 2010–2013: Final report. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
Dupre, D. & Karjalainen, A. (2003). Employment of disabled people in Europe in 2002. In Eurostat, Theme 3: Population and Social Conditions. Luxembourg: Statistical Office of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3433488/5542140/KS-NK-03-026-EN.PDF/0b806b41-0898-45d2-ac99-0f085e983887 Google Scholar
Dutta, A., Gervey, R., Chan, F., Chou, C., & Ditchman, N. (2008). Vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes for people with disabilities: A United States study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18 (4), 326–334.Google Scholar
Escorpizo, R., Reneman, M.F., Ekholm, J., Fritz, J., Krupa, T., Marnetoft, S.U., . . . Chan, C.C. (2011). A conceptual definition of vocational rehabilitation based on the ICF: Building a shared global model. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21 (2), 126–133.Google Scholar
Eurofound. (2016). New topics, new tools and innovative practices adopted by the social partners. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
European Quality in Social Services. (2012). Enhancing performance, meeting needs in social service provision. Brussels, Belgium: Author.Google Scholar
Franche, R.L., Cullen, K., Clarke, J., Irvin, E., Sinclair, S., & Frank, J. (2005). Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15 (4), 607–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, R.T., McMahon, B., & Danczyk-Hawley, C. (2003). Progression of disability benefits: A perspective on multiple sclerosis. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 19, 173–179.Google Scholar
Gensby, U., Lund, T., Kowalski, K., Saidj, M., Jørgensen, A., Filges, T., . . . Labriola, M. (2012). Workplace disability management programs promoting return-to-work: A systematic review (p. 17). Oslo, Norway: Campbell Systematic Reviews.Google Scholar
Hanophy, J. (2012). Testimony of the Council of State Administrators of Vocational Rehabilitation (CSAVR) on work incentives in social security disability programs. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 36 (1), 13–20.Google Scholar
Harder, H.G., & Geisen, T. (2011). Disability management: An introduction. In Geisen, T. & Harder, H.G. (Eds.), Disability management and workplace integration: International research findings (pp. 1–9). Farnham, England: Ashgate/Gower.Google Scholar
Harder, H.G. & Scott, L.R. (Eds). (2005). Comprehensive disability management. London, England: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hauben, H., Coucheir, M., Spooren, J., McAnaney, D., & Delfosse, C. (2012) Assessing the impact of European governments’ austerity plans on the rights of people with disabilities: European Report. European Foundation Centre, Brussels. Retrieved from: http://www.enil.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Austerity-European-Report_FINAL.pdf Google Scholar
Health Service Executive. (2013). HSE policy and procedure rehabilitation of employees back to work after illness or injury. Revision No. 4.13. Dublin, Ireland: Author. Retrieved from http://www.hse.ie/eng/staff/Resources/hrppg/Rehabilitation_Policy.pdf Google Scholar
Hoefsmit, N., Houkes, I., & Nijhuis, F.J. (2012). Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22, 462–477.Google Scholar
Høgelund, J. & Pedersen, J. G. (2002). Active labour market policies for disabled people in Denmark. Copenhagen: The Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
Hsieh, H.F. & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9), 1277–1288.Google Scholar
Ilmarinen, J. (2009) Work ability — a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 35 (1), 1–5.Google Scholar
Institute for Work and Health. (2015, Spring). What researchers mean by primary, secondary and tertiary prevention. atWORK 80. Retrieved from https://www.iwh.on.ca/system/files/at-work/at_work_80.pdf Google Scholar
International Labour Organisation. (2001). ILO code of practice: Managing disability in the workplace. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar
International Social Security Association. (2013). ISSA Guidelines: Return to Work and Reintegration. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from https://www.issa.int/excellence/guidelines/return-to-work Google Scholar
Jørgensen, K. & Laursen, B. (2013). Absence from work due to occupational and non-occupational accidents. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 41 (1), 18–24.Google Scholar
Loisel, P. & Anema, J.R. (2013). Handbook of work disability: Prevention and management. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loisel, P., Durand, R., Baril, J., Gervais, M., & Falardeau, M. (2005). Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: Perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15 (4), 581–590.Google Scholar
Main, L., & Haig, J. (2006). Occupational therapy and vocational rehabilitation: An audit of an outpatient occupational therapy service. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69 (6), 288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAnaney, D. (2011). European perspectives on disability management (1999–2009): Insights and developments. In Geisen, T. & Harder, H.G. (Eds.), Disability management and workplace integration: International research findings. Farnham, England: Ashgate/Gower.Google Scholar
McAnaney, D. (2016). An industry-wide strategy for consensus-based disability management: The enhanced disability management program. Paper presented at the International Forum on Disability Management 2016, Kuala Lumpur, November 22, 2016.Google Scholar
McAnaney, D., Webster, B., Lohan, M., & Wynne, R. (2001). Disability management: A system of response or a response to a system?’ The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 7 (1), 1–22.Google Scholar
McAnaney, D. & Wynne, R. (2017). International good practice in vocational rehabilitation: lessons for Ireland. Dublin, Ireland: National Disability Authority.Google Scholar
Murphy, G.C. & O'Hare, M.A. (2011). The role of workplace social support in disability management. In Harder, H.G. & Geisen, T. (Eds.), Disability management and workplace integration: International research findings (pp. 43–58). Farnham, England: Ashgate/Gower.Google Scholar
Nastasia, I., Tcaciuc, R., & Coutu, M.-F. (2011). Strategies for preventing prolonged disability in workers compensated for work related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic and comprehensive literature review. Occupational Rehabilitation: Studies and Research Projects — Report R-719. Montreal, Canada: Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en Sécurité du travail (IRSST).Google Scholar
National Institute of Disability Management and Research. (2003). Disability management in the workplace: A guide to establishing a joint workplace program (2nd ed.) Port Alberni, BC: Author.Google Scholar
Office of Regulatory Services. (2010). What is injury management and rehabilitation? Version 6. Canberra, Australia: Retrieved from http://www.worksafe.act.gov.au/page/view/1455/title/what-is-injury-management-and#Injury%20Management Google Scholar
Optiwork. (2007). Optimising strategies for integrating people with disabilities into work. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Institute for Rehabilitation Research. Retrieved from http://www.optiwork.org Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). Transforming disability into ability: Policies to promote work and income security for disabled people. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from: http://www1.oecd.org/publications/ebook/8103021E.PDF108 Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers (Vol. 3), Denmark, Finland, Ireland and the Netherlands. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers: A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/ireland/46461490.pdf Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Enhancing employability: Report prepared for the G20 Employment Working Group with inputs from the International Monetary Fund. Paris, France: Author.Google Scholar
Peltomäki, P., Hussi, T., Julin, H., Launis, K., Liira, J., & Räsänen, K. (Eds.). (2002). Maintenance of work ability research and assessment: Summaries. Vammala, Finland: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.Google Scholar
Rubin, S.E., Roessler, R.T., & Rumrill, P. Jr. (2016). Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process (7th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
Rumrill, P.D. & Roessler, R.T. (2015). An overview of multiple sclerosis: Medical, psychosocial, and vocational aspects of a chronic and unpredictable neurological disorder. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 29 (2), 122–134.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2012). A profile of persons with disabilities among Canadians aged 15 years or older. Ottawa, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2015001-eng.htm Google Scholar
Tansey, T., Strauser, D., Frain, M., Bishop, M., Chiu, C-Y., Kaya, C., & Chan, F. (2015). Differential vocational rehabilitation services patterns related to job retention and job seeking needs of individuals with multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 29 (2), 109–121.Google Scholar
Thorne, J., McAnaney, D., Biggs, H., & Wynne, R. (2002). The development and utility of an interactive assessment protocol for evaluating company based responses in managing employees on long-term absence. Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 8 (2), 50–63.Google Scholar
van Hooser, J. & Rice, B.D. (1989) Disability management in the workplace: Report from the study group. Institute on Rehabilitation Issues (Sixteenth Institute on Rehabilitation Issues, Savannah, Georgia, October 1989). Hot Springs: University of Arkansas, Research and Training Center in Vocational Rehabilitation.Google Scholar
Waddell, G., Burton, K., Nicholas, A.K., & Kendall, A.S. (2008) Vocational rehabilitation, what works, for whom, and when? London, England: Department of Work and Pensions.Google Scholar
World Bank (2013). Lessons from 11 country case studies: A Global synthesis report for the Global Conference on Universal Health Coverage for Inclusive and Sustainable Growth. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Wynne, R. & McAnaney, D. (2004). Employment and disabilities: Back to work strategies. Dublin, Ireland: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
Wynne, R., McAnaney, D., Thorne, J., Hinkka, K., & Jarvisalo, J. (2005). The RETURN Project — Between work and welfare: Improving return to work strategies for long term absent employees. In Mannila, S. & Jarvikoski, A. (Eds.) Disability and working life (pp.74–100). Helsinki, Finland: Rehabilitation Foundation, Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
Wynne, R., McAnaney, D., O'Kelly, C., & Fleming, P. (2006). Employment guidance services for people with disabilities — conceptual framework and structured inventory of initiatives. Dublin, Ireland: The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
Wynne, R., & McAnaney, D. (2009) Preventing social exclusion through illness or disability: Models of good practice. Work, 32, 95–103.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

McAnaney and Wynne supplementary material

Appendix Figure Legend

Download McAnaney and Wynne supplementary material(File)
File 51.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

McAnaney and Wynne supplementary material

Figures A1-A3

Download McAnaney and Wynne supplementary material(File)
File 58.8 KB