Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T10:56:27.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Responses on “What We Talk About When We Talk About Provenance”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2016

Elizabeth Marlowe
Elizabeth Marlowe*
Affiliation:
Department of Art and Art History, Colgate University; Email: emarlowe@colgate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Rejoinder
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 2016 , pp. 257 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chippindale, Christopher, and Gill, David. 2000. “Material Consequences of Contemporary Classical Collecting.” American Journal of Archaeology 104: 463–511.Google Scholar
Peppard, Michael. 2014, “Mosaics from a Church in the Diocese of Apamea, Syria (463 CE).” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 190: 168–72.Google Scholar
Picón, C., and Hemingway, S., eds. 2016. Pergamon and the Hellenistic Kingdoms of the Ancient World. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 2010. “Combating the Illicit Antiquities Trade: Progress and Problems.” Newsletter Ufficio Studi 2: 9–13.Google Scholar
von Bothmer, D. 1984. “A Greek and Roman Treasury.” Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 42(1): 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar