Skip to main content Accessibility help

Synthetic biology in space: considering the broad societal and ethical implications

  • Margaret S. Race (a1), Jacob Moses (a2), Christopher McKay (a3) and Kasthuri J. Venkateswaran (a4)


Although the field of synthetic biology is still in its infancy, there are expectations for great advances in the coming decades, both on Earth and potentially in space. Promising applications for long duration space missions include a variety of biologically engineered products and biologically aided processes and technologies, which will undoubtedly be scrutinized for risks and benefits in the broad context of ethical, legal and social realms. By comparing and contrasting features of Earth-based and space-applied synthetic biology, it is possible to identify the likely similarities and differences, and to identify possible challenges ahead for space applications that will require additional research, both in the short and long terms. Using an analytical framework associated with synthetic biology and new technologies on Earth, this paper analyses the kinds of issues and concerns ahead, and identifies those areas where space applications may require additional examination. In general, while Earth- and space-based synthetic biology share many commonalities, space applications have additional challenges such as those raised by space microbiology and environmental factors, legal complications, planetary protection, lack of decision-making infrastructure(s), long duration human missions, terraforming and the possible discovery of extraterrestrial (ET) life. For synthetic biology, the way forward offers many exciting opportunities, but is not without legitimate concerns – for life, environments and society, both on Earth and beyond.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Bedau, M., Parke, E.C., Tangen, U. & Hantaxhe-Tangen, B. (2009). Societal and ethical checkpoints for bottom-up synthetic biology or protocells. Syst. Synth. Biol. 3, 6575.
Caplan, A.L. (2010). Regulating Synthetic Life: Man-Made Organisms Have Become a Reality – Here's How Policymakers Can Start Dealing with It. pp. 1617. The Pennsylvania Gazette, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Carlson, R. (2011). Staying sober about science. Hastings Cent. Rep. 41(4), 2225.
Caruso, D. (2008). Synthetic Biology: An Overview and Recommendations for Anticipating and Addressing Emerging Risks. Science Progress, Center for American Progress, Washington, DC. (accessed 8 January 2011).
Cho, M.K., Magnus, D., Caplan, A.L., McGee, D. & the Ethics of Genomics Group (1999). Ethical considerations in synthesizing a minimal genome. Science 286, 20872090.
Cho, M.K. & Relman, D.A. (2010). Synthetic ‘Life’, ethics, national security, and public discourse. Science 329, 3839.
Criswell, M.E., Race, M.S., Rummel, J.D. & Baker, A. (eds) (2005). Planetary Protection Issues in the Human Exploration of Mars. Final Workshop Report (Workshop held June 2001, Pingree Park CO), NASA/CP-2005-213461, NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA.
Dabrock, P. (2009). Playing God? Synthetic biology as a theological and ethical challenge. Syst. Synth. Biol. 3, 4754.
Deplazes, A. & Huppenbauer, M. (2009). Synthetic organisms and living machines. Syst. Synth. Biol. 3, 5563.
Erickson, B., Singh, R. & Winters, P. (2011). Synthetic biology: regulating industry uses of new biotechnologies. Science 333, 12541256.
ETC Group et al. (2010). NGOs Blast US Presidential Commission on Bioethics. ETC Press Release, 16 December 2010. (accessed 3 January 2011).
Gaisser, S. & Reiss, T. (2009). Shaping the science–industry–policy interface in synthetic biology. Syst. Synth. Biol. 3, 109114.
Guston, D.H. & Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-time technology assessment. Technol. Cult. 24, 93109.
Gutmann, A. (2011). The ethics of synthetic biology: guiding principles for emerging technologies. Hastings Cent. Rep. 41(4), 1722.
Hart Research Associates (2010). Awareness and Impressions of Synthetic Biology. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC.
Haynes, R.H. & McKay, C.P. (1992). The implantation of life on mars: Feasibility and motivation. Adv. Space Res. 12(4), 133140.
Hogan, J.A., Race, M.S., Fisher, J.W., Joshi, J.A. & Rummel, J.D. (2006). Life Support and Habitation and Planetary Protection Workshop, Final Report. NASA/TM-2006–213485, NASA Ames Research Center. Moffett Field, CA.
Horneck, G., Klaus, D.M. & Mancinelli, R.L. (2010). Space microbiology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74, 121156.
Jennings, B. (2010). Enlightenment and enchantment: technology and moral limits. Technol. Soc. 32(1), 2530.
Kaebnick, G.E. (2011). Of microbes and men. Hastings Cent. Rep. 41(4), 2528.
Kaiser, J. (2010a). Updated: Synthetic biology doesn't require new rules, bioethics panel says. Science 330, 1735. (Science Insider, 24 December 2010).
Kaiser, J. (2010b). Oversight but no strict rules for synthetic biology. Science 330, 1166.
Khushf, G. (2007). Upstream ethics in nanomedicine: a call for research. Nanomedicine 2(4), 511521.
Kminek, G., Rummel, J.D. & Race, M.S. (eds) (2007). Planetary Protection and Human System Research and Technology, Joint ESA–NASA Workshop Report, ESA WPP-276, ESTECH, Nordwijk, The Netherlands.
Levine, J.S. & Schild, R.E. (eds) (2010). The Human Mission to Mars: Colonizing the Red Planet. Cosmology Science Publishers, Cambridge, MA. ISBN: 0982955235.
McKay, C.P. (1982). Terraforming Mars. J. Br. Interplanet. Soc. 5, 427433.
McKay, C.P. (1990). Does Mars have rights? An approach to the environmental ethics of planetary engineering. In Moral Expertise, ed. MacNiven, D., pp. 184197. Routledge, New York.
McKay, C.P. (2001b). Let's put Martian life first. Planet. Rep. 21, 45.
McKay, C.P. (2010). Biologically reversible exploration. Science 3243, 718. (doi: 10.1126./science.1167987).
McKay, C.P. (2011). The search for life in our solar system and the implications for science and society. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 594606.
McKay, C.P. & Marinova, M.M. (2001). The physics, biology, and environmental ethics of making Mars habitable. Astrobiology 1, 89109.
McKay, C.P., Toon, O.B. & Kasting, J.F. (1991). Making Mars habitable. Nature 352, 489496.
Murray, T.H. (2011). Interests, identities and synthetic biology. Hastings Cent. Rep. 41(4), 3136.
NASA (2010). Synthetic Biology Workshop: What are the Potential Roles for Synthetic Biology in NASA's Missions? NASA Ames Research Center, 30/31 October 2010.
NRC (2006). Preventing the Forward Contamination of Mars. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Parens, E.J. et al. (2009a). A question of ethics: response. Science 323, 339.
Parens, E., Johnston, J. & Moses, J. (2009b). Ethical Issues in Synthetic Biology: An Overview of the Debates. Foresight and Governance Project, The Woodrow Wilson International Center. for Scholars, Washington, DC, (accessed 24 January 2012).
Pauwels, E. (2009). Review of quantitative and qualitative studies on US public perceptions of synthetic biology. Syst. Synth. Biol. 3, 3746.
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, (2010). New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies, Washington, DC. (accessed 3 January 2011).
Rabinow, P. & Bennett, G. (2009). Synthetic biology: Ethical ramifications 2009. Syst. Synth. Biol. 3, 99108.
Race, M.S. (2007). Societal and ethical dimensions of astrobiology and the search for extraterrestrial life. In Planets and Life: The Emerging Science of Astrobiology, ed. Sullivan, W.R. & Baross, J., Chapter 24, pp. 483–496. Cambridge University Press, London.
Race, M.S. (2011). Policies for scientific exploration and environmental protection: Comparison of the Antarctic and outer space treaties. In Science Diplomacy: Antarctica, Science and the Governance of International Spaces, ed. Berkman, P.A. et al. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington, DC.
Race, M.S. & Randolph, R.O. (2002). The need for operating guidelines and a decision making framework applicable to the discovery of non-intelligent extraterrestrial life. Adv. Space Res. 30(6), 15831591.
Randolph, R., Race, M.S. & McKay, C.P. (1997). Reconsidering the ethical and theological implications of extraterrestrial life. CTNS Bulletin 17(3), 18.
Rodemeyer, M. (2009). New Life, Old Bottles: Regulating First-Generation Products of Synthetic Biology. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC. (accessed 8 January 2011).
Rummel, J.D. (2010). Personal communication. Chair, COSPAR Panel on Planetary Protection; Institute for Coastal Science & Policy, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
Rummel, J.D. et al. (2011). COSPAR Workshop on Ethical Considerations for Planetary Protection in Space Exploration, Final Workshop Report (Workshop held June 2010, Princeton, NJ); in preparation. COSPAR, Paris, France.
Rummel, J.D., Race, M.S., Conley, C.A. & Liskowsky, D.R. (2010). The integration of planetary protection requirements and medical support on a mission to Mars. In The Human Mission to Mars: Colonizing the Red Planet, ed. Levine, J.S. & Schild, R.E., Cosmology Science Publishers, Cambridge, MA. (accessed 5 January 2011).
Schmidt, M. (2009). Special issue: Societal aspects of synthetic biology. Syst. Synth. Biol. 3, 12.
Schmidt, M., Dando, M. & Deplazes, A. (2011). Dealing with the outer reaches of synthetic biology – biosafety, biosecurity, IPR and ethical challenges of chemical synthetic biology. In Chemical Synthetic Biology, ed. Luisi, P.L. & Chiarabelli, C., Chapter 13, John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, UK.
Schmidt, M., Ganguli-Mitra, A., Torgersen, H., Kelle, Al., Deplazes, A. & Biller-Andorno, N. (2009). A priority paper for the societal and ethical aspects of synthetic biology. Syst. Synth. Biol. 3, 37.
Schultz-Makuch, D. & Davies, P. (2010). To boldly go: a one-way human mission to Mars. In The Human Mission to Mars: Colonizing the Red Planet, ed. Levine, J.S. & Schild, R.E., Cosmology Science Publishers, Cambridge, MA. (accessed 5 January 2011).
Torgersen, H. (2009). Synthetic biology in society: learning from past experience? Syst. Synth. Biol. 3, 917.
Wellhausen, R. & Mukuda, G. (2009). Aspects of the political economy of development and synthetic biology. Syst. Synth. Biol. 3, 115123.


Synthetic biology in space: considering the broad societal and ethical implications

  • Margaret S. Race (a1), Jacob Moses (a2), Christopher McKay (a3) and Kasthuri J. Venkateswaran (a4)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed