Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:05:30.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biological effects of gamma-ray bursts: distances for severe damage on the biota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2007

Douglas Galante
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil e-mail: douglas@astro.iag.usp.br
Jorge Ernesto Horvath
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil e-mail: douglas@astro.iag.usp.br

Abstract

In this paper we present a unified, quantitative synthesis of analytical and numerical calculations of the effects that could be caused on Earth by a gamma-ray burst (GRB), considering atmospheric and biological implications. The main consequences of the illumination by a GRB are grouped into four distinct classes and analysed separately, namely: direct γ flash, UV flash, O3 layer depletion and cosmic rays. The effectiveness of each of these classes is compared and distances for significant biological damage are given for each one. We find that the first three effects have the potential to cause global environmental changes and biospheric damage, even if the source is located at galactic distances or even farther afield (up to 150 kpc, where 1 parsec=3.09×1016 m, about five times the Galactic diameter of 30 kpc). Instead, cosmic rays would only be a serious threat for close sources (of the order of a few parsecs).

As a concrete application from a well-recorded event, the effects on the biosphere of an event identical to the giant flare of SGR1806-20 on 27 December 2004 have been calculated. In spite of not belonging to the so-called ‘classical’ GRBs, most of the parameters of this recent flare are quite well known and have been used as a calibration for our study. We find that a giant flare impinging on Earth is not a threat for life in all practical situations, mainly because it is not as energetic, in spite of being much more frequent than GRBs, unless the source happens to be extremely close.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)