Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:46:17.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray Emission from Hot DA White Dwarfs; EXOSAT Results, and Implications for Atmospheric Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Frits Paerels
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Space Research Beneluxlaan 21, 3527 HS Utrecht, the Netherlands
John Heise
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Space Research Beneluxlaan 21, 3527 HS Utrecht, the Netherlands

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the observations of the photospheric X-ray spectra of hot DA white dwarfs, obtained with the 500 lines mm−1 Transmission Grating Spectrometer on EXOSAT. These spectra cover the full soft X-ray band, at high wavelength resolution and statistical quality. They allow us to do an accurate measurement of the photospheric parameters, particularly of effective temperature and chemical composition of the atmosphere.

We consider the case of HZ 43 in some detail. Model atmospheric spectra that satisfy all measured absolute optical, UV and X-ray fluxes turn out not to fit the shape of the measured X-ray spectrum. However, from a comparison of model spectra calculated with different model atmospheres codes we infer the existence of a 15% systematic uncertainty in the model fluxes at the shortest wavelengths (λ < 100 Å) in current model calculations. This can explain the fitting problem. Since the systematic uncertainty in the models is larger than the statistical uncertainty in the shape of the measured X-ray spectrum of HZ 43, we cannot at present use this measured shape to derive the effective temperature and gravity. We revert to broad band photometry, using the measured integrated soft X-ray flux and the optical flux, to determine Te = 45,000 – 54,000K, R/R = 0.0140 – 0.0165. From the absence of the He II Ly edge at 227 Å in the measured spectrum, we set a upper limit on the photospheric helium abundance of He/H = 1.0 × 10−5; this upper limit is independent of the uncertainties in the model calculations mentioned above.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1989

References

Dahn, C.C., et al. (1982), Astron. J., 87, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deKorte, P.A.J., et al. (1981), Space Sci. Rev., 30, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, J., et al. (1988), Ap. J., (in press ).Google Scholar
Holberg, J.B., et al. (1980), Ap. J.(letters), 242, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holberg, J.B., Wesemael, F., and Basile, J. (1986), Ap. J., 306, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paerels, F.B.S., et al. (1986a), Ap. J.(Letters), 309, L33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paerels, F.B.S., et al. (1986b), Ap. J., 308, 190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paerels, F.B.S., et al. (1988), Ap.J., 329, 849 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petre, R., Shipman, H.L., and Canizares, C., (1986), Ap.J., 304, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B. (1985), Adv. Space Res., 5, 35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesemael, F., et al. (1980), Ap.J.Suppl., 43, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar