Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:58:01.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consistent Relativistic VLBI Theory with Picosecond Accuracyƚ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

M. Soffel
Affiliation:
Theoretical Astrophysics Uni. Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 7400 Tübingen, FRG
J. Müller
Affiliation:
Technical Uni. MunichInstitut f. Astron. u. Physikal. GeodäsieArcisstr. 21 8000 Munich 2, FRG
X. Wu
Affiliation:
Theoretical Astrophysics Uni. Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 7400 Tübingen, FRG
C. Xu
Affiliation:
Theoretical Astrophysics Uni. Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 7400 Tübingen, FRG

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The accuracy of Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), representing one of the most important space techniques of modern geodesy, especially for the determination of the Earth’s rotation parameters and baselines, is steadily increasing. Presently, delay residuals are of the order of 30 - 50 ps, corresponding to an uncertainty in length of about 1 centimeter e.g. in the determination of baselines or the position of the rotation pole. As has already been stressed by many authors, at this level of accuracy a relativistic formulation of the VLBI measuring process is indispensable (e.g. the gravitational time delay for rays getting close to the limb of the Sun amounts to 170 ns!). Starting with the work by Finkelstein et al. (1983) a series of papers has meanwhile been published on a relativistic VLBI theory (Soffelet al., 1986; Hellings, 1986; Zeller et al., 1986; Herring, 1989). However, possibly apart from Brumberg’s treatment in his new monograph (Brumberg, 1990) all of these theories have one fatal drawback: they are not based upon some consistent theory of reference frames, which relates the global, barycentric coordinates, in which the measuring process is primarily formulated and in which positions and velocities of the bodies of the solar system are computed, with the local, geocentric coordinates, comoving with the Earth, in which the geodetically meaningful baselines are defined. Furthermore, none of these theories (including Brumberg’s (1990) treatment) have the accuracy of one picosec which seems desirable with respect to the achieved residual values.

Type
Part 2. Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © United States Naval Observatory 1991

Footnotes

ƚ

Paper presented at the Eubanks Meeting at the U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C., October 12th, 1990. Work supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the Volkswagen Stiftung; M.S. kindly acknowledges the receipt of a Heisenberg fellowship

References

Brumberg, V.A., 1990, “Essential Relativistic Celestial Mechanics”, Hilger, Bristol Google Scholar
Brumberg, V.A., Kopejkin, S.M., 1988, in: “Reference Systems”, Kovalevsky, J., Mueller, I.I. and Kolaczek, B. (eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht Google Scholar
Brumberg, V.A., Kopejkin, S.M., 1989, Nuovo Cim. B103, 63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchet, L., Damour, T., 1989, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, 50, 377 Google Scholar
Damour, T., Soffel, M., Xu, C., 1990a, in: “Les Journées 1990”, Systemes de Reference Spatio-Temporels, Capitaine, N. (ed.), Observatoire de Paris Google Scholar
Damour, T., Soffel, M., Xu, C., 1990b, “General Relativistic Celestial Mechanics I. Method and Definition of Reference Systems”, submitted for publicationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damour, T., Soffel, M., Xu, C., 1990c, “Relativistic Celestial Mechanics and Reference Frames”, Proc. of the IAU Colloqium 127, Virginia Beach, Oct., 14-20, 1990Google Scholar
Finkelstein, A.M., Kreinovich, V.J., Pandey, S.N., 1983, Astrophys. Space Sci. 94, 233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellings, R.W., 1986, Astron. J. 91, 650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, T., 1989, Memo to Jim Ryan, dated January, 30, 1989 based upon previous notes by Shapiro, I.I. Google Scholar
Misner, C., Thome, K.S., Wheeler, J.A., 1973, “Gravitation”, Freeman, San Francisco Google Scholar
Richter, G.W., Matzner, R.A., 1983, Phys. Rev. 28, 3007 Google Scholar
Soffel, M., Ruder, H., Schneider, M., Campbell, J., Schuh, H., 1986, in: “Relativistic effects in Celestial Mechanics and Geodesy”, Kovalevsky, J. and Brumberg, V. (eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht Google Scholar
Soffel, M., 1989, “Relativity in Astrometry, Celestial Mechanics and Geodesy”, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York Google Scholar
Will, C., 1981, “Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
Zeller, G., Soffel, M., Ruder, H., Schneider, M., 1986, Veröff. der Bayr. Komm. f.d. Intern. Erdmessung, Astronomisch-Geodätische Arbeiten, Heft Nr. 48, pp. 218236 Google Scholar