Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T01:12:58.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Is the Applicability of a Novel Surveillance Concept of Ventilator-Associated Events?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2017

Miia Jansson ,
Tero Ala-Kokko ,
Lauri Ahvenjärvi ,
Jaana Karhu ,
Pasi Ohtonen  and
Hannu Syrjälä
Miia Jansson*
Affiliation:
Division of Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Tero Ala-Kokko
Affiliation:
Division of Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Lauri Ahvenjärvi
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
Jaana Karhu
Affiliation:
Division of Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Pasi Ohtonen
Affiliation:
Division of Operative Care, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
Hannu Syrjälä
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control, Department of Infection Control, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
*
Address correspondence to Miia Jansson, Division of Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland and Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland (miia.jansson@oulu.fi).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a novel surveillance concept called the “ventilator-associated event,” which focused surveillance on objective measures of complications among patients that underwent invasive ventilations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the concordance and possible differences in efficacy (ie, disease severity and outcomes) between 2 surveillance paradigms: (1) infection-related ventilator-associated complications (iVAC) and (2) on conventional ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

DESIGN

Prospective, observational, single-center cohort study.

PATIENTS

This study included 85 adult patients that received invasive ventilation for at least 2 consecutive calendar days in a 22-bed, adult, mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit in Finland between October 2014 and June 2015.

RESULTS

Among these patients, 9 (10.1 per 1,000 days of mechanical ventilation) developed iVAC (10.6%) and 20 (22.4 per 1,000 days of mechanical ventilation) developed conventional VAP (23.5%). The iVAC indicators were most often caused by atelectasis and fluid overload. Compared with patients with conventional VAP, patients with iVAC had significantly worse respiratory status but no other differences in disease severity or outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of conventional VAP was >2-fold that of iVAC, and the surveillance paradigms for VAP and iVAC capture different patterns of disease. Our results suggest that this novel surveillance concept, although based on objective measures of declining oxygenation, actually identified deteriorations of oxygenation due to noninfectious causes.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:983–988

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 38 , Issue 8 , August 2017 , pp. 983 - 988
Copyright
© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kalil, AC, Metersky, ML, Klompas, M, et al. Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guideline by the Infectious Diseases Society and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:e61–e111.Google Scholar
2. Pneumonia (ventilator-associated [VAP] and non-ventilator-associated pneumonia [PNEU]) event. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/6pscVAPcurrent.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed February 5, 2017.Google Scholar
3. Klompas, M, Platt, R. Ventilator-associated pneumonia—the wrong quality measure for benchmarking. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:803–805.Google Scholar
4. Ventilator associated event. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/10-vae_final.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed February 5, 2017.Google Scholar
5. Klompas, M, Khan, Y, Kleinman, K, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a novel surveillance paradigm for complications of mechanical ventilation. PLoS One 2011;6:e18062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018062.Google Scholar
6. Muscedere, J, Sinuff, T, Heyland, DK, et al. The clinical impact and preventability of ventilator-associated conditions in critically ill patients who are mechanically ventilated. Chest. 13(144):1453–1460.Google Scholar
7. Lilly, CM, Landry, KE, Sood, RN, et al. Prevalence and test characteristics of national health safety network ventilator-associated events. Crit Care Med 2014;42:2019–2028.Google Scholar
8. Bouadma, L, Snneville, R, Garrouste-Orgeas, M, et al. Ventilator-associated events: prevalence, outcome, and relationship with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2015;43:1798–1806.Google Scholar
9. Klompas, M, Branson, R, Eichenwald, EC, et al. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:915–936.Google Scholar
10. Le Gall, JR, Lemeshow, S, Saulnier, F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. J Am Med Assoc 1993;270:2957–2963.Google Scholar
11. Vincent, JL, Moreno, R, Takala, J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707–710.Google Scholar
12. Knaus, WA, Draper, EA, Wagner, DP, Zimmerman, JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818–829.Google Scholar
13. Stevens, JP, Silva, G, Gillis, J, et al. Automated surveillance for ventilator-associated events. Chest 2014;146:1612–1618.Google Scholar
14. Van Mourik, M, Klouwenberg, PK, Ong, DS, et al. Validation and assessment of the new surveillance paradigm for ventilator-associated events. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2013;2(Suppl 1):O64. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-2-S1-O64.Google Scholar
15. Klein Klouwenberg, PM, van Mourik, MS, Ong, DS, et al. Electronic implementation of a novel surveillance paradigm for ventilator-associated events: feasibility and validation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;189:947–955.Google Scholar
16. Boyer, AF, Schoenberg, N, Babcock, H, et al. A prospective evaluation of ventilator-associated conditions and infection-related ventilator-associated conditions. Chest 2015;147:68–81.Google Scholar
17. Chang, HC, Chen, CM, Kung, SC, Wang, CM, Liu, WL, Lai, CC. Difference between novel and conventional surveillance paradigms of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Infect Control 2015;43:133–136.Google Scholar
18. Syrjälä, H, Broas, M, Suramo, I, Ojala, A, Lähde, S. High-resolution computed tomography for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Clinic Infect Dis 1998;27:358–363.Google Scholar
19. Syrjälä, H, Broas, M, Ohtonen, P, Jartti, A, Pääkkö, E. Chest magnetic resonance imaging for pneumonia diagnosis in outpatients with lower respiratory tract infection. Eur Respir J 2016. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01303-2016.Google Scholar
20. Karhu, JM, Ala-Kokko, TI, Ahvenjärvi, LK, Rauvala, E, Ohtonen, P, Syrjälä, HPT. Early chest computed tomography in adult acute severe community-acquired pneumonia patients treated in the intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016;60:1102–1110.Google Scholar
21. Ahvenjärvi, LK, Laurila, JJ, Jartti, A, Ylipalosaari, P, Ala-Kokko, TI, Syrjälä, HP. Multi-detector computed tomography in critically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:547–552.Google Scholar
22. Kim, HJ, Park, SY, Lee, HY, Lee, KS, Shin, KE, Moon, JW. Ultra-low-dose chest CT in patients with neutropenic fever and hematologic malignancy: image quality and its diagnostic performance. Cancer Res Treat 2014;46:393–402.Google Scholar
23. Macri, F, Greffier, J, Pereira, F, et al. Value of ultra-low-dose chest CT with iterative reconstruction for selected emergency room patients with acute dyspnea. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:1637–1644.Google Scholar
24. Johnson, VE, Huang, JH, Pilcher, WH. Special cases: mechanical ventilation of neurosurgical patients. Critical Care Clin 2007;23:275–290.Google Scholar
25. Cunha, BA, Tu, RP. Fever in neurosurgical patient. Heart Lung 1988;17:608–611.Google Scholar
26. Kilpatrick, MM, Lowry, DW, Firlik, AD, Yonas, H, Marion, D. Hyperthermia in the neurosurgical intensive care unit. Neurosurgery 2000;47:850–856.Google Scholar
27. Kuusinen, P, Ala-Kokko, T, Jartti, A, et al. The occurrence of pneumonia diagnosis among neurosurgical patients: the definition matters. Neurocrit Care 2012;16:123–129.Google Scholar