Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T10:14:17.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weekly Transparent Dressing Changes Linked to Increased Bacteremia Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Ruth M. Curchoe*
Affiliation:
Unity Health System, Rochester, New York
Jeanette Powers
Affiliation:
Unity Health System, Rochester, New York
Nayef El-Daher
Affiliation:
Unity Health System, Rochester, New York
*
Infection Control, 1555 Long Pond Road, Rochester, New York

Abstract

Background:

In 2000, the rate of primary bloodstream infections (BSIs) was double that in 1999 for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with triple lumen catheters, pulmonary artery catheters, or both. In December 1999, changes in products and practices related to site care were implemented as a cost-saving initiative.

Objective:

To determine the factors contributing to an increase of BSIs after cost-saving measures for site care had been introduced.

Design:

Epidemiologic study involving prospective identification of infection.

Setting:

A community teaching hospital.

Participants:

Patients in a 20-bed, medical-surgical ICU identified as having triple lumen catheters, pulmonary artery catheters, or both and a primary BSI during 2000 and 2001.

Methods:

Alcohol swab sticks were reintroduced and the frequency of transparent dressing changes and site care was increased. Inservice presentations were conducted on aseptic technique and posters were placed reviewing site care protocol for physicians and nurses.

Results:

The incidence of primary BSIs decreased significantly (P = .003) during a 3-month intervention and this decrease was sustained through the following 12 months.

Conclusions:

Prolonging the interval between the change of transparent dressings from 3 times weekly to once weekly and switching from alcohol swab sticks to pads was associated with an increase in BSIs, which was controlled after returning to the original policy (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:730-732)

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Pearson, ML. Guideline for the prevention of intravascular device-related infections. Am J Infect Control 1996;24:262293.Google Scholar
2.Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology. Infection Control and Applied Epidemiology: Principles and Practice. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1999.Google Scholar
3.Henderson, D. Infection due to percutaneous intravascular devices. In: Mandell, G, Bennett, J, Dolin, R. Principles and Practices of Infectious Diseases, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000:30053020.Google Scholar
4.Saint, S, Veenstra, DL, Lipsky, BA. The clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial central venous catheter-related infection: are antimicrobial catheters useful? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21:375380.Google Scholar