Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:36:37.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Web-Based Electronic Health Records Improve Data Completeness and Reduce Medical Discrepancies in Employee Vaccination Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Monica Salazar ,
Kaylan E. Stinson ,
Stefan H. Sillau ,
Linda Good  and
Lee S. Newman
Monica Salazar*
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
Kaylan E. Stinson
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
Stefan H. Sillau
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
Linda Good
Affiliation:
Scripps Health, San Diego, California
Lee S. Newman
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado Axion Health, Denver, Colorado
*
2937 Champa Street, Unit 3, Denver, CO 80205 (monica.salazar@colorado.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A Web-based electronic health record (EHR) system was compared with traditional paper-based documentation and vaccination tracking during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. In a cohort of 8,411 healthcare network employees, EHRs improved completeness of self-reported contraindication data and reduced medical discrepancies. Vaccination program quality and accuracy are enhanced by EHRs.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33(1):84-86

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 84 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hillestad, R, Bigelow, J, Bower, A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24(5):1103–1117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Shachak, A, Hadas-Dayagi, M, Ziv, A, Reis, S. Primary care physicians' use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24(3):341–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Elson, RB, Connelly, DP. Computerized patient records in primary care: their role in mediating guideline-driven physician behavior change. Arch Fam Med 1995;4(8):698–705.Google Scholar
4. Hazlehurst, B, Mullooly, J, Naleway, A, Crane, B. Detecting possible vaccination reactions in clinical notes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:306–310.Google ScholarPubMed
5. Ribner, BS, Hall, C, Steinberg, JP, et al. Use of a mandatory declination form in a program for influenza vaccination of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(4):302–308.Google Scholar
6. Polgreen, PM, Polgreen, LA, Evans, T, Helms, C. A statewide system for improving influenza vaccination rates in hospital employees. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30(5):474–478.Google Scholar
7. Douville, LE, Myers, A, Jackson, MA, Lantos, JD. Health care worker knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding mandatory influenza vaccination. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164(1):33–37.Google Scholar
8. Babcock, HM, Gemeinhart, N, Jones, M, Dunagan, WC, Woeltje, KF. Mandatory influenza vaccination of health care workers: translating policy to practice. Clin Infect Dis 2010;50(4):459–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Bourgeois, FT, Simons, WW, Olson, K, Brownstein, JS, Mandl, KD. Evaluation of influenza prevention in the workplace using a personally controlled health record: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(1):e5.Google Scholar
10. Hinrichsen, VL, Kruskal, B, O'Brien, MA, Lieu, TA, Piatt, R. Using electronic medical records to enhance detection and reporting of vaccine adverse events. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14(6):731–735.Google Scholar