Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Using Samples to Estimate the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Surveillance Process

  • Emma S. McBryde (a1) (a2) (a3), Heath Kelly (a4), Caroline Marshall (a1) (a5), Philip L. Russo (a2), D. L. Sean McElwain (a3) and Anthony N. Pettitt (a3)...

Abstract

Determining sensitivity and specificity of a postoperative infection surveillance process is a difficult undertaking. Because postoperative infections are rare, vast numbers of negative results exist, and it is often not reasonable to assess them all. This study gives a methodological framework for estimating sensitivity and specificity by taking only a small sample of the number of patients who test negative and comparing their findings to the reference or “gold standard” rather than comparing the findings of all patients to the gold standard. It provides a formula for deriving confidence intervals for these estimates and a guide to minimum requirements for sampling results.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St., Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (Emma.McBryde@mh.org.au)

References

Hide All
1.Friedman, ND, Russo, PL, Bull, AL, Richards, MJ, Kelly, H. Validation of coronary artery bypass graft surgical site infection surveillance data from a statewide surveillance system in Australia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:812817.
2.Huotari, K, Lyytikainen, O, Seitsalo, S. Patient outcomes after simultaneous bilateral total hip and knee joint replacements. J Hosp Infect 2007;65:219225.
3.Ehrenkranz, NJ, Schultz, JM, Richter, EI. Recorded criteria as a “Gold Standard” for sensitivity and specificity estimates of surveillance of nosocomial infection: a novel method to measure job performance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:697702.
4.Davison, AC, Hinkley, DV. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
5.Mannien, J, van der Zeeuw, AE, Wille, JC, van den Hof, S. Validation of surgical site infection surveillance in The Netherlands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:3641.
6.Little, RJA, Rubin, DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd ed. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2002.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Using Samples to Estimate the Sensitivity and Specificity of a Surveillance Process

  • Emma S. McBryde (a1) (a2) (a3), Heath Kelly (a4), Caroline Marshall (a1) (a5), Philip L. Russo (a2), D. L. Sean McElwain (a3) and Anthony N. Pettitt (a3)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.