Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T11:18:53.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surveillance in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Patient and Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Maryanne B. McGuckin*
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Steven G. Kelsen
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
*
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Medical Technology, 420 Service Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104

Abstract

Microbiologic surveillance of both the patients and the ambient environment of a surgical intensive care unit allowed us to relate the incidence of nosocomial respiratory tract infection to levels of airborne bacteria. Over the study period respiratory tract nosocomial infection rates varied from 0.7% to 17.0%, and nonrespiratory infection rates varied from 1.0% to 25.0%. Airborne bacteria counts during that time varied from 1.0 ± 0.8 S.E. CFU/ft3 to 96.0 ± 6.8 S.E. CFU/ft3. There was a reasonably close correlation between airborne bacteria levels and the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia (r=0.81, p<0.05). Furthermore, there was a close correlation between a specific organism nosocomial infection rate and the number of colonies of that organism present in the air (r=0.88, p<0.05). In contrast, there was no significant relationship between airborne bacteria counts and nonrespiratory attack rates (r=0.60, p<0.05). If the bacteria traveled from the air to the patients, there appear to be at least three possible explanations for this significant relationship: (1) direct inoculation of the airway by the airborne bacteria; (2) inoculation of the airway by direct contact, which is related to the degree of “cleanliness” of the environment; and (3) an increased incidence of contaminated respiratory equipment and airway inoculation because of high counts of airborne bacteria. It is also possible that high bacterial air counts represent contamination of the air from patients with respiratory infections. Regardless of the pathway(s), surveillance of the ambient environment may prove to be a useful epidemiologic tool in the study and control of nosocomial respiratory tract infections in certain high-risk patient care areas.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kelsen, SG, McGuckin, M, Kelsen, DPet al.Airborne contamination of fine particle nebulizers. JAMA 1977;237:23112314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.McGuckin, M. Kelsen, SG. Contamination of fine particle nebulizers. American Society of Microbiology Annual Meeting, Chicago, 1974.Google Scholar
3.Andersen, AA. New sampler for the collection, sizing and enumeration of viable airborne particles. J Bacteriol 1958;76:471484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Garner, JS, Bennett, JV. Scheckler, WEet al.Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections. Chicago. American Hospital Association, 1971.Google Scholar
5.Altemeier, WA, Burke, JF, Pruitt, BAet al. (eds). Manual on Control of Infection in Surgical Patients. Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincolt, 1976.Google Scholar
6.Walter, CW, Kundsin, RB, Brubaker, MM. The incidence of airborne wound infection during operation. JAMA 1963;186:908913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Greene, VW, Vesley, D, Bond, RG. Microbiological contamination of hospital air. Appl Microbiol 1962;10:561571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed