Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-30T00:41:09.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surgical-Site Infection Rates in Patients Who Undergo Elective Surgery on the Same Day as Their Hospital Admission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Farrin A. Manian*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infection Control, St John's Mercy Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri
Lynn Meyer
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infection Control, St John's Mercy Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri
*
621 S New Ballas, Tower B-3002, St Louis, MO 63141

Abstract

Objective:

To follow over time surgical-site infection (SSI) rates in patients admitted to the hospital on the same day as their elective surgery (group I), and to compare these rates with those of other surgical patients who also required postoperative hospitalization but either were hospitalized for 1 or more days immediately prior to surgery or underwent surgery on a nonelective basis (group II).

Design:

Observation of overall SSI rates over time for group I and II patients and study of risk factors associated with increased SSI rate among group I neurosurgical patients.

Setting:

A 900-bed, tertiary-care community hospital with >10,000 surgical procedures performed each year on patients requiring postoperative hospital stay.

Patients:

A total of 48,464 surgical procedures were performed on consecutive patients from 1990 to 1994, with 18,794 (39%) involving group I patients. In addition, 511 consecutive procedures performed on neurosurgical patients requiring postoperative hospitalization from July 1994 to May 1995 were analyzed.

Results:

In 1990, the overall SSI rate of group I patients was significantly lower than that of group II patients (0.4% vs 1.3%, relative risk [RR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 2-6.4; P<.0001), but, by 1994, there was no longer any significant difference between the SSI rates of group I and II patients (1.8% and 1.6%, respectively; P=.38). In 1994, the SSI rate in group I neurosurgical patients was significantly greater than that of group II patients (3.4% vs 0.4%; RR, 8.3; CI95, 1.05-66; P=.02). During the period April through September 1994 (warm months), group I neurosurgical patients were associated with a significantly lower American Society of Anesthesiologists score and SSI risk index (based on National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System data) and a higher likelihood of having “clean-class” wounds, but significantly greater-than-expected SSI rate when adjusted for patient risk index and type of procedure (4.7% vs 1.4%; RR, 3.3; CI95, 1.3-8.6; P=.02). During the same period, the observed and expected SSI rates were not significantly different for group II neurosurgical patients.

Conclusions:

As a whole, the SSI rates among patients undergoing elective surgery on the same day of their hospital admission is no longer significantly lower than that of other patients who also require postoperative hospitalization. For certain procedures, such as those commonly performed on the neurosurgical service, elimination of preoperative hospital stay may be associated with greater-than-expected risk of SSI.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Selwyn, S. Skin preparation, the surgical ‘scrub’ and related rituals. In: Karran, S, ed. Controversies in Surgical Sepsis. Eastbourne and New York: Praeger; 1980:2332.Google Scholar
2. Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606608.Google Scholar
3. Garner, JS. Guidelines for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1986;7:193200.Google Scholar
4. Manian, FA, Meyer, L. Adjunctive use of monthly physician questionnaires for surveillance of surgical site infections after hospital discharge and in ambulatory surgery patients: report of a seven-year experience. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:390394.Google Scholar
5. Owens, WD, Felts, JA, Spitznagel, EL. ASA physical status classification: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978;49:239243.Google Scholar
6. Culver, DH, Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. Am J Med 1991;91(suppl 3D):152157.Google Scholar