Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:02:59.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rising Rates of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Community Hospitals: A Mixed-Methods Review of Epidemiology and Microbiology Practices in a Network of Community Hospitals in the Southeastern United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Joshua T. Thaden*
Affiliation:
Duke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina
Sarah S. Lewis
Affiliation:
Duke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Durham, North Carolina
Kevin C. Hazen
Affiliation:
Duke Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
Kirk Huslage
Affiliation:
Statewide Program for Infection Control and Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Vance G. Fowler Jr
Affiliation:
Duke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina
Rebekah W. Moehring
Affiliation:
Duke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Durham, North Carolina Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
Luke F. Chen
Affiliation:
Duke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Durham, North Carolina
Constance D. Jones
Affiliation:
North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, North Carolina
Zack S. Moore
Affiliation:
North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, North Carolina
Daniel J. Sexton
Affiliation:
Duke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Durham, North Carolina
Deverick J. Anderson
Affiliation:
Duke University Division of Infectious Diseases, Durham, North Carolina Duke Infection Control Outreach Network, Durham, North Carolina
*
Clinical Fellow in Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, 315 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710 (joshua.thaden@duke.edu).

Extract

(See the commentary by Pfeiffer and Beldavs, on pages 984–986.)

Objective

Describe the epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and examine the effect of lower carbapenem breakpoints on CRE detection.

Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

Inpatient care at community hospitals.

Patients

All patients with CRE-positive cultures were included.

Methods

CRE isolated from 25 community hospitals were prospectively entered into a centralized database from January 2008 through December 2012. Microbiology laboratory practices were assessed using questionnaires.

Results

A total of 305 CRE isolates were detected at 16 hospitals (64%). Patients with CRE had symptomatic infection in 180 cases (59%) and asymptomatic colonization in the remainder (125 cases; 41%). Klebsiella pneumoniae (277 isolates; 91%) was the most prevalent species. The majority of cases were healthcare associated (288 cases; 94%). The rate of CRE detection increased more than fivefold from 2008 (0.26 cases per 100,000 patient-days) to 2012 (1.4 cases per 100,000 patient-days; incidence rate ratio (IRR), 5.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22–22.7]; P = .01). Only 5 hospitals (20%) had adopted the 2010 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) carbapenem breakpoints. The 5 hospitals that adopted the lower carbapenem breakpoints were more likely to detect CRE after implementation of breakpoints than before (4.1 vs 0.5 cases per 100,000 patient-days; P < .001; IRR, 8.1 [95% CI, 2.7–24.6]). Hospitals that implemented the lower carbapenem breakpoints were more likely to detect CRE than were hospitals that did not (3.3 vs 1.1 cases per 100,000 patient-days; P = .01).

Conclusions

The rate of CRE detection increased fivefold in community hospitals in the southeastern United States from 2008 to 2012. Despite this, our estimates are likely underestimates of the true rate of CRE detection, given the low adoption of the carbapenem breakpoints recommended in the 2010 CLSI guidelines.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2014 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nordmann, P, Naas, T, Poirel, L. Global spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17(10):17911798.Google Scholar
2. Ben-David, D, Kordevani, R, Keller, N, et al. Outcome of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18(1):5460.Google Scholar
3. Borer, A, Saidel-Odes, L, Riesenberg, K, et al. Attributable mortality rate for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30(10):972976.Google Scholar
4. Daikos, GL, Petrikkos, P, Psichogiou, M, et al. Prospective observational study of the impact of VIM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase on the outcome of patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53(5):18681873.Google Scholar
5. Patel, G, Huprikar, S, Factor, SH, Jenkins, SG, Calfee, DP. Outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection and the impact of antimicrobial and adjunctive therapies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29(12):10991106.Google Scholar
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012 CRE toolkit: guidance for control of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. http://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/cre/cre-toolkit/index.html. Published 2012. Accessed November 2, 2013.Google Scholar
7. Wise, R. The urgent need for new antibacterial agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66(9):19391940.Google Scholar
8. Gupta, N, Limbago, BM, Patel, JB, Kallen, AJ. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: epidemiology and prevention. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53(1):6067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). http://www.ahrq.gov/research/data/hcup/index.html. Published 2013. Accessed October 13, 2013.Google Scholar
10. Anderson, KF, Lonsway, DR, Rasheed, JK, et al. Evaluation of methods to identify the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45(8):27232725.Google Scholar
11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twentieth Informational Supplement. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2010. CLSI document M100-S20.Google Scholar
12. Anderson, DJ, Miller, BA, Chen, LF, et al. The network approach for prevention of healthcare-associated infections: long-term effect of participation in the Duke Infection Control Outreach Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(4):315322.Google Scholar
13. Freeman, JT, Sexton, DJ, Anderson, DJ. Emergence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in community hospitals throughout North Carolina: a harbinger of a wider problem in the United States? Clin Infect Dis 2009;49(2):e30e32.Google Scholar
14. Lin, MY, Lyles-Banks, RD, Lolans, K, et al. The importance of long-term acute care hospitals in the regional epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57(9):12461252.Google Scholar
15. Woodford, N, Eastaway, AT, Ford, M, et al. Comparison of BD Phoenix, Vitek 2, and MicroScan automated systems for detection and inference of mechanisms responsible for carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48(8):29993002.Google Scholar
16. Lewis, SS, Moehring, RW, Chen, LF, Sexton, DJ, Anderson, DJ. Defining multidrug resistance (MDR) for gram-negative (GN) infections: who gets the gown? In: Program and abstracts of IDWeek 2013. San Francisco, CA: IDWeek, 2013. Abstract 40634.Google Scholar