Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T01:41:07.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pseudoepidemic of Rhodotorula rubra in Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Karen K. Hoffmann ,
David J. Weber  and
William A. Rutala
Karen K. Hoffmann*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
David J. Weber
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
William A. Rutala
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
*
CB# 7030 Burnett-Womack 547, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.7030
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between March and June 1988, Rhodotorula rubra was isolated from the bronchial washings of 30 of 56 (54%) patients undergoing bronchoscopy at a North Carolina community hospital. Pulmonary disease consistent with invasive fungal pneumonia was not apparent for any patient. Repeat sputum cultures were performed on 11 patients, none of whom were positive for R rubra. Investigation revealed fungal contamination of two brushes used to clean the bronchoscope channels and one positive sample of the tub water used to test the integrity of the bronchoscope prior to cleaning and disinfection. Control measures instituted were high-level disinfection of all equipment used to clean the bronchoscopes, including the brushes, complete air drying of the bronchoscopes before storing and storage of equipment in closed cabinets. An additional case one month after instituting these measures prompted the addition of a final 70% ethyl alcohol rinse of the bronchoscopes immediately prior to storage. Over a six-month period no additional cases have been identified.

Despite published disinfection guidelines, pseudoepidemics and infections from contaminated equipment continue to appear. This pseudoepidemic investigation revealed a site for contaminating bronchoscopes that has not been previously reported, the inner cannula cleaning brushes. This emphasizes the need for stringent adherence to recommended cleaning and disinfection guidelines.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 10 , Issue 11 , November 1989 , pp. 511 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Patterson, EJ. History of bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy for foreign body. Laryngoscope. 1926;36:157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Jackson, C. Bronchoscopy and Esophagoscopy. Philadelphia, Penn: W.B. Saunders Company;1922.Google Scholar
3. Zavala, D. Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscoping. Cedar Rapids, Iowa: Pepeo Litho;1978.Google Scholar
4. Oho Kenkichi, R. Practical Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy. New York, NY: Igaku-Shom;1984.Google Scholar
5. Meden, G, Hall, CS. Ahmad, M. Retrieval of microbiological specimens through the fiberoptic bronchoscope. Cleveland Clinic Quarterly. 1985;52:495–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Goldstein, B, Abrutyn, E. Pseudo-outbreak of Bacillus species: related to fiberoptic bronchoscopy.. Hosp Infect. 1985;6:194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Schleupner, CJ, Hamilton, JR. A pseudoepidemic of pulmonary fungal infections related to fiberoptic bronchoscopy, infect Control. 1980;1:38–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Siegman-Igra, V, Inbar, G, Campus, A. An “outbreak” of pulmonary pseudoinfection by Serratia marcescens . J Hosp Infect. 1985;6:218–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Martone, WJ. Osterman, CA, Fisher, KA, Wenzel, RP. Pseudomonas cepacia: implications and control of epidemic nosocomial colonization. Rev Infect Dis. 1981;3:708–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Sammartino, MT, Israel, RH, Magnussen, CR. Pseudomonas aeruginosa contamination of fiberoptic bronchoscopes. J Hosp Infect. 1982;3:65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Nelson, KE, Larson, PA, Schraufnagel, DE, Jackson, J. Transmission of tuberculosis by flexible fiberbronchoscopes. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983;127:97–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Leers, W. Disinfecting endoscopes: how not to transmit Mycobacterium tuberculosis by bronchoscopy. Can Med Assoc J. 1980;123:275–280.Google Scholar
13. Rippon, JW. Medical Mycology: The Pathogenic Fungi and the Pathogenic Adinomycetes. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co;1974:226–227.Google Scholar
14. Mok, WY, Barreto Da Silva, MS. Mycoflora of the human dermal surfaces. Can J Microbiol. 1984;30:1205–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Pore, KS, Chen, J. Meningitis caused by Rhodotorula . Sabouraudia. 1976;14:331–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Wong, V, Ross, L, Opas, L, Lieberman, E. Rhodotorula rubra peritonitis in a child undergoing intermittent cycling peritoneal dialysis. J Infect Dis. 1988;157:393–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Eisenberg, ES, Alpert, BE. Weiss, RA, Mittman, N, Soeiro, R. Rhodotorula rubra peritonitis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Med. 1983;75:349–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Rusthoven, JJT Feld, R, Tuffnell, PC. Systemic infection by Rhodotorula spp in the immunocompromised host. J Infect. 1984;8:241–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Pien, FD, Thompson, KL, Deye, D, Roberts, GD. Rhodotorula septicemia—two cases and a review of the literature. Mayo Clin Proc. 1980;55:258–260.Google Scholar
20. Donald, FE, Sharp, JF, Firth, JL, Crowley, JL, Ispahani, P. Rhodotorula rubra ventriculitis. J Infect. 1988;16:187–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Crow, S. Cleaning, disinfecting procedures help control spread of infection. Hospitals. 1978;52:111–113.Google ScholarPubMed
22. Webb, SF, Vall-Spinosa, A. Outbreak of Serratia mdrcescens associated with the flexible ft ber bronchoscope. Chest. 1975;68:703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Axon, ATR, Cotton, PB. Endoscopy and infection. Gut. 1983;24:1064–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. American Operating Room Nurses ad hoc Committee of Infection Control in the Handling of Endoscopic Equipment. Guidelines for cleaning and disinfection of flexible fiberoptic endoscoprs (FTE) used in GI endoscopy. AORN J. 1978;28:907–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Rutala, WA. Draft guideline for selection and use of disinfectants. Am J Infect Control. 1989;17:24A–38A.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Society of Gastrointestinal Assistants. Recommended Guidelines for Infection Control in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Settings. Rochester, NY: SGA Task Force for Disinfection and Sterilization Policy;1988.Google Scholar
27. Lowry, PW. Jarvis, WR, Oberle, AD, et al. Mycobacterium chelonae causing otitis media in an ear-nose-and-throat practice. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:978–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Terleckyj, B, Axler, DA. Quantitative neutralization assay of fungicidal activity of disinfectants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31:794–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed