No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Occupational Hazards of Operating Opportunities for Improvement
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2015
Abstract
The emergence of hepatitis C virus compels us to refocus on protecting ourselves, our coworkers, and our families from potential illness, disability, or death. As bloodborne pathogens continue to evolve and mutate, the best option available is to prevent exposure. Surgeons have the opportunity to prevent the majority of exposures by utilizing currently available technology and knowledge. Surgeons should see, use, and evaluate a variety of safety-engineered devices, because their feedback can lead to improvements in technology. Education, communication, and access to safer technology will motivate surgeons to adopt safer behavior patterns. Provided with information and tools, we can change through self-motivation.
- Type
- Issues in Surgery
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1996
References
1.Polish, LB, Tong, MJ, Co, RL, et al.Risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection among health care personnel in a community hospital. Am J Infect Control 1993;21:196–200.Google Scholar
2.Tokars, JI, Bell, DM, Culver, DH, et al.Percutaneous injuries during surgical procedures. JAMA 1992;267:2899–2904.Google Scholar
3.Hamory, BH. Underreporting of needlestick injuries in a university hospital staff. Am J Infect Control 1983;11:174–177.Google Scholar
4.Wright, JG, McGeer, A. Human immunodeficiency virus transmission between surgeons and patients in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop 1993;297:272–281.Google Scholar
5.Lanphear, BO, Linneman, CC, Cannon, CG. Hepatitis C virus infection in healthcare workers: risk of exposure and infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:745–750.Google Scholar
6.Kao, JH, Chen, PJ, Lai, MY, Chen, DS. Superinfection of heterologous hepatitis C virus in a patient with chronic type C hepatitis. Gastroenterology 1993;105:583–587.Google Scholar
7.Andreone, P, Gramenzi, A, Cursaro, C, et al.Familial cluster of hepatitis C virus type 1. J Infect Dis 1994;170:1042–1043.Google Scholar
8.Kelen, GD, Green, GB, Purcell, RH, et al.Hepatitis B and hepatitis C in emergency room patients. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1399–1404.Google Scholar
9.Davis, MS. Sharps management in surgery. Infection Control & Sterilization Technology. 1995;1:411–414.Google Scholar
10.Robert, L, Short, L, Chamberland, M, et al.Interventions to reduce blood contacts and percutaneous injuries during gynecological surgical procedures. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:102–103. Abstract.Google Scholar
11.Doyle, PM, Alvi, S, Johanson, R. The effectiveness of double gloving in obstetrics and gynecology. Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:83–84.Google Scholar
12.Chapman, S, Duff, P. Frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact in association with selected obstetric surgical procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;168:1354–1357.Google Scholar
13.Cohn, GM, Seifer, DB. Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:715–717.Google Scholar
14.Chiarello, LA. Evaluation of needlestick technology: a perspective from the New York State pilot study experience. Advances in Exposure Prevention 1995;1:3–7,11.Google Scholar
15.Chiarello, LA. Practice forum: section of needlestick prevention devices: a conceptual framework for approaching product evaluation. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:386–395.Google Scholar
16.Thompson, JA. AORN's multisite clinical study of bloodborne exposures in OR personnel. AORN J 1996;63:428–433.Google Scholar