Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Matching Bacteriological and Medico-Administrative Databases Is Efficient for a Computer-Enhanced Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections: Retrospective Analysis of 4,400 Surgical Procedures in a French University Hospital

  • Brice Leclère (a1), Camille Lasserre (a1) (a2), Céline Bourigault (a1), Marie-Emmanuelle Juvin (a1), Marie-Pierre Chaillet (a3), Nicolas Mauduit (a3), Jocelyne Caillon (a1) (a2), Matthieu Hanf (a4) and SSI Study Group (a1) (a2) (a5)...

Abstract

Objective.

Our goal was to estimate the performance statistics of an electronic surveillance system for surgical site infections (SSIs), generally applicable in French hospitals

Methods.

Three detection algorithms using 2 different data sources were tested retrospectively on 9 types of surgical procedures performed between January 2010 and December 2011 in the University Hospital of Nantes. The first algorithm was based on administrative codes, the second was based on bacteriological data, and the third used both data sources. For each algorithm, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated. The reference method was the hospital’s routine surveillance: a comprehensive review of the computerized medical charts of the patients who underwent one of the targeted procedures during the study period.

Setting.

A 3,000-bed teaching hospital in western France.

Population.

We analyzed 4,400 targeted surgical procedures.

Results.

Sensitivity results varied significantly between the three algorithms, from 25% (95% confidence interval, 17–33) when using only administrative codes to 87% (80%–93%) with the bacteriological data and 90% (85%–96%) with the combined algorithm. Fewer variations were observed for specificity (91%–98%), PPV (21%–25%), and NPV (98% to nearly 100%). Overall, performance statistics were higher for deep SSIs than for superficial infections.

Conclusions.

A reliable computer-enhanced SSI surveillance can easily be implemented in French hospitals using common data sources. This should allow infection control professionals to spend more time on prevention and education duties. However, a multicenter study should be conducted to assess the generalizability of this method.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(11):1330–1335

Copyright

Corresponding author

Department of Bacteriology and Infection Control, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France (didier.lepelletier@chu-nantes.fr).

References

Hide All
1. Platt, R, Yokoe, DS, Sands, KE. Automated methods for surveillance of surgical site infections. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7(2):212216. doi:10.3201/eid0702.700212.
2. Leal, J, Laupland, KB. Validity of electronic surveillance systems: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2008;69(3):220229. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2008.04.030.
3. Freeman, R, Moore, LSP, García Álvarez, L, Charlett, A, Holmes, A. Advances in electronic surveillance for healthcare-associated infections in the 21st century: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2013;84(2):106119. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2012.11.031.
4. Astagneau, P, L’Hériteau, F, Daniel, F, et al. Reducing surgical site infection incidence through a network: results from the French ISO-RAISIN surveillance system. J Hosp Infect 2009;72(2):127134. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2009.03.005.
5. Agence Technique de l’Information sur l’Hospitalisation. CCAM Classification Commune des Actes Médicaux, V5. 2006. http://www.atih.sante.fr.
6. Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13(10):606608.
7. Woeltje, KF, Lautenbach, E. Informatics and epidemiology in infection control. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2011;25(1):261270. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2010.11.013.
8. Wilson, APR, Gibbons, C, Reeves, BC, et al. Surgical wound infection as a performance indicator: agreement of common definitions of wound infection in 4773 patients. BMJ 2004;329(7468):720. doi:10.1136/bmj.38232.646227.DE.
9. Lepelletier, D, Ravaud, P, Baron, G, Lucet, J-C. Agreement among health care professionals in diagnosing case vignette-based surgical site infections. PLoS ONE 2012;7(4):e35131. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035131.
10. Birgand, G, Lepelletier, D, Baron, G, et al. Agreement among healthcare professionals in ten European countries in diagnosing case-vignettes of surgical-site infections. PLoS ONE 2013;8(7):e68618. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068618.
11. Landers, T, Apte, M, Hyman, S, Furuya, Y, Glied, S, Larson, E. A comparison of methods to detect urinary tract infections using electronic data. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010;36(9):411417.
12. Apte, M, Landers, T, Furuya, Y, Hyman, S, Larson, E. Comparison of two computer algorithms to identify surgical site infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2011;12(6):459464. doi:10.1089/sur.2010.109.
13. Chalfine, A, Cauet, D, Lin, WC, et al. Highly sensitive and efficient computer-assisted system for routine surveillance for surgical site infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27(8):794801. doi:10.1086/506393.
14. Moro, ML, Morsillo, F. Can hospital discharge diagnoses be used for surveillance of surgical-site infections? J Hosp Infect 2004;56(3):239241. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.022.
15. Song, X, Cosgrove, SE, Pass, MA, Perl, TM. Using hospital claim data to monitor surgical site infections for inpatient procedures. Am J Infect Control 2008;36(3):S32–S36. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.008.
16. Bolon, MK, Hooper, D, Stevenson, KB, et al. Improved surveillance for surgical site infections after orthopedic implantation procedures: extending applications for automated data. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48(9):12231229. doi:10.1086/597584.
17. West, J, Khan, Y, Murray, DM, Stevenson, KB. Assessing specific secondary ICD-9-CM codes as potential predictors of surgical site infections. Am J Infect Control 2010;38(9):701705. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2010.03.015.
18. Gerbier, S, Bouzbid, S, Pradat, E, et al. Use of the French medico-administrative database (PMSI) to detect nosocomial infections in the University hospital of Lyon. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2011;59(1):314. doi:10.1016/j.respe.2010.08.003.
19. Grammatico-Guillon, L, Baron, S, Gaborit, C, Rusch, E, Astagneau, P. Quality assessment of hospital discharge database for routine surveillance of hip and knee arthroplasty–related infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:646651. doi:10.1086/676423.
20. Bouzbid, S, Gicquel, Q, Gerbier, S, et al. Automated detection of nosocomial infections: evaluation of different strategies in an intensive care unit 2000–2006. J Hosp Infect 2011;79(1):3843. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2011.05.006.
21. Petherick, ES, Dalton, JE, Moore, PJ, Cullum, N. Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006;6:170. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-6-170.
22. Miner, AL, Sands, KE, Yokoe, DS, et al. Enhanced identification of postoperative infections among outpatients. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10(11):1931–1937. doi:10.3201/eid1011.040784.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed