Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T10:56:11.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lack of Association Between the Increased Incidence of Clostridium difficile–Associated Disease and the Increasing Use of Alcohol-Based Hand Rubs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

John M. Boyce ,
Cathy Ligi ,
Cindy Kohan ,
Diane Dumigan  and
Nancy L. Havill
John M. Boyce*
Affiliation:
Hospital of Saint Raphael, New Haven, Connecticut Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Cathy Ligi
Affiliation:
Mid-State Medical Center, Meriden, Connecticut
Cindy Kohan
Affiliation:
Hospital of Saint Raphael, New Haven, Connecticut
Diane Dumigan
Affiliation:
Hospital of Saint Raphael, New Haven, Connecticut
Nancy L. Havill
Affiliation:
Hospital of Saint Raphael, New Haven, Connecticut
*
Infectious Diseases Section, Hospital of Saint Raphael, 1450 Chapel Street, New Haven, CT 06511 (Jboyce@srhs.org)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To determine whether there is an association between the increasing use of alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) and the increased incidence of Clostridium difficile–associated disease (CDAD).

Setting.

A 500-bed university-affiliated community teaching hospital.

Methods.

Use of ABHRs during the period 2000-2003 was expressed as the number of liters of ABHR used per 1000 patient-days. The proportion of hand hygiene episodes performed by using an ABHR was determined by periodic observational surveys. CDAD was defined as a physician-ordered stool assay positive for C. difficile toxin A or A/B. The incidence of CDAD was expressed as the number of unique patients who had 1 or more positive CDAD test results per 1,000 patient-days.

Results.

During 2000-2003, the use of ABHR increased 10-fold, from 3 to greater than 30 L/1,000 patient-days (P< .001). The proportion of hand hygiene episodes performed using an ABHR increased from 10% to 85% (P< .001). The incidence of CDAD in 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 was 1.74, 2.33, 1.14, and 1.18 cases/1,000 patient-days, respectively.

Conclusion.

Despite a significant and progressive increase in the use of ABHRs in our facility during a 3-year period, there was no evidence that the incidence of CDAD increased. These findings suggest that factors other than the increased use of ABHRs are responsible for the increasing incidence of CDAD noted since 2000 in other facilities.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , May 2006 , pp. 479 - 483
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bartlett, JG, Chang, TW, Gurwith, M, Gorbach, SL, Onderdonk, AB. Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis due to toxin-producing Clostridia. N Engl J Med 1978; 298:531–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Larson, HE, Price, AB, Honour, P, Bordello, SP. Clostridium difficile and the aetiology of pseudomembranous colitis. Lancet 1978; 1:1063–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Gorbach, SL. Antibiotics and Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1690–1691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.McFarland, LV. Epidemiology of infectious and iatrogenic nosocomial diarrhea in a cohort of general medicine patients. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Bartlett, JG. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:334–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Archibald, LK, Banerjee, SN, Jarvis, WR. Secular trends in hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile disease in the United States, 1987-2001. J Infect Dis 2004; 189:1585–1589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Morris, AM, Jobe, BA, Stoney, M, Sheppard, BC, Deveney, CW, Deveney, KE. Clostridium difficile colitis: an increasingly aggressive iatrogenic disease?. Arch Surg 2002; 137:1096–1100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Pepin, J, Valiquette, L, Alary, M-E, et al. Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity. Can Med Assoc J 2004; 171:466–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Layton, BA, McDonald, LC, Gerding, DN, Liedtke, LA, Strausbaugh, LJ. Changing patterns of Clostridium difficile disease: a report from infectious diseases physicians. Presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Infectious Society of America (Boston). 2004. Abstract 563.Google Scholar
10.McDonald, LC, Killgore, GE, Thompson, A, Johnson, S, Gerding, DN. The C. difficile Investigation Team. Emergence of an epidemic strain of Clostridium difficile in the United States, 2001-4: potential role for virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance traits. Presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Infectious Society of America (Boston). 2004. Abstract LB-2.Google Scholar
11.Warny, M, Pepin, J, Fang, A, et al. Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet 2005; 366:1079–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Boyce, JM, Pittet, D, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002; 51:1–45.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Weber, DJ, Sickbert-Bennett, E, Gergen, MF, Rutala, WA. Efficacy of selected hand hygiene agents used to remove Bacillus atrophaeus (a surrogate of Bacillus anthracis) from contaminated hands. JAMA 2003; 289:1274–1277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Larson, EL, APIC Guidelines Committee. APIC guideline for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 1995; 23:251–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Dallal, RM, Harbrecht, BG, Goujoukas, AJ, et al. Fulminant Clostridium difficile: an underappreciated and increasing cause of death and complications. Ann Surg 2002; 235:363–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Gopal Rao, G, Jeanes, A, Osman, M, Aylott, C, Green, J. Marketing hand hygiene in hospitals—a case study. J Hosp Infect 2002; 50:42–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Gordin, FM, Schultz, ME, Huber, RA, Gill, JA. Reduction in nosocomial transmission of drug-resistant bacteria after introduction of an alcohol-based handrub. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005; 26:650–653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Leischner, J, Bartel, J, Marinakos-Trulis, G, et al. Decrease in nosocomial rates of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, but not Clostridium difficile infections after the introduction of alcohol hand gels and a hand hygiene campaign. Presented at the 15th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (Los Angeles). 2005. Abstract 288.Google Scholar
19.Elward, AM, Babcock, H, Jones, R, et al. The effect of a hand hygiene campaign on rates of infection with antimicrobial-resistant organisms. Presented at the 15th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (Los Angeles). 2005. Abstract 294.Google Scholar
20.Leischner, J, Johnson, S, Sambol, S, Parada, J, Gerding, D. Effect of alcohol hand gels and Chlorhexidine hand wash in removing spores of Clostridium difficile from hands. Paper presented at: 45th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy meeting (Washington, DC). 2005. Abstract LB-29.Google Scholar
21.Buggy, BP, Wilson, KH, Fekety, R. Comparison of methods for recovery of Clostridium difficile from an environmental surface. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18:348–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, McDonald, LC, et al. An outbreak of severe Clostridium difficile–associated disease involving an epidemic strain with increased virulence. Paper presented at: 15th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (Los Angeles). 2005. Abstract 59.Google Scholar
23.Patel, SM, Noskin, GA, Warren, J, et al. Increased severity of disease among patients infected with a newly recognized and widely disseminated epidemic strain of Clostridium difficile. Paper presented at: 15th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (Los Angeles). 2005. Abstract 285.Google Scholar
24.Gaynes, R, Rimland, D, Killum, E, et al. Outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection in a long-term care facility: association with gatifloxacin use. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:640–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Muto, CA, Pokrywka, M, Shutt, K, et al. A large outbreak of Clostridium difficile–associated disease with an unexpected proportion of deaths and colectomies at a teaching hospital following increased fluoroquinolone use. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005; 26:273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar