Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:40:45.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intra-cavitary Ultrasound Probes: Cleaning and High-Level Disinfection Are Necessary for Both the Probe Head and Handle to Reduce the Risk of Infection Transmission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2015

Michelle J. Alfa
Michelle J. Alfa*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology and St Boniface Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
*
Address correspondence to Michelle Alfa, PhD, FCCM, St Boniface Research Centre, 351 Tache Ave., Winnipeg, MB, Canada R2H 2A6 (malfa@sbrc.ca).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , May 2015 , pp. 585 - 586
Copyright
© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Canadian Standards Association. Z314-8-13 Decontamination of reusable medical devices. In CSA Z314 Series Standards. Canadian Standards Association, 2013.Google Scholar
2. Rutala, WA, Weber, DJ, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities, 2008. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/Disinfection_Sterilization/acknowledg.html. Accessed January 13, 2015.Google Scholar
3. Ngu, A, McNally, G, Patel, D, Gorgis, V, Leroy, S, Burdach, J. Reducing transmission risk through high-level disinfection of transvaginal ultrasound transducer handles. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:581–584 (in this issue).Google Scholar
4. Leroy, S. Infectious risk of endovaginal and transrectal ultrasonography: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 2013;83:99–106.Google Scholar
5. M’Zali, F, Bounizra, C, Leroy, S, et al. Persistence of microbial contamination on transvaginal ultrasound probes despite low-level disinfection procedure. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e93368. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093368.Google Scholar
6. Kac, G, Podglajen, I, Si-Mohamed, A, Rodi, A, Grataloup, C, Meyer, G. Evaluation of ultraviolet C for disinfection of endocavitary ultrasound transducers persistently contaminated despite probe covers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:165–170.Google Scholar
7. Sanz, EG, Theoret, J, Liao, MM, Erickson, C, Kendall, JL. Bacterial contamination and cleanliness of emergency department ultrasound probes. CJEM 2011;13:384–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Casalegno, JS, LeBail Carval, K, Eibach, D, et al. High risk HPV contamination of endocavity vaginal ultrasound probes: an underestimated route of nosocomial infection? PLoS ONE 2012;7:e48137. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048137.Google Scholar
9. Meyers, J, Ryndock, E, Conway, MJ, Meyers, C, Robison, R. Susceptibility of high-risk human papillomavirus type 16 to clinical disinfectants. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:1546–1550. doi10.1093/jac/dku006.Google Scholar
10. Vickery, K, Gorgis, VZ, Burdach, J, Patel, D. Evaluation of an automated high-level disinfection technology for ultrasound transducers. J Infect Public Health 2014;7:153–160.Google Scholar