Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:06:24.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intra-abdominal Abscesses and Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

S. Brümmer ,
D. Sohr  and
P. Gastmeier
S. Brümmer
Affiliation:
Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, and the National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
D. Sohr
Affiliation:
Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, and the National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
P. Gastmeier*
Affiliation:
Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, and the National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
*
Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburg-damm 27, D 12 203 Berlin, Germany( Petra.Gastmeier@charite.de)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Briefs
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 30 , Issue 7 , July 2009 , pp. 713 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Glavic, Z, Begic, L, Simlesa, D, Rukavina, A. Treatment of acute cholecystitis: a comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2001;15:398–401.Google Scholar
2.Brummer, S, Sohr, D, Rüden, H, Gastmeier, P. Surgical site infection rates using a laparoscopic approach: results of the German National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System [in German]. Chirurg 2007;78:910–914.Google Scholar
3.Yau, K, Siu, W, Tang, C, Yang, G, Li, M. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205:60–65.Google Scholar
4.Brandt, C, Sohr, D, Behnke, M, Daschner, F, Rüden, H, Gastmeier, P. Reduction of surgical site infection rates associated with active surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1347–1351.Google Scholar
5.Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of surgical site infections: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606–608.Google Scholar
6.Sauerland, S, Lefering, R, Neugebauer, E. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(4):CD001546.Google Scholar
7.Bennett, J, Boddy, A, Rhodes, M. Choice of approach for appendectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. SurgLaparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007;17:245–255.Google Scholar
8.Pokala, N, Sadhasivam, S, Kiran, R, Parithivel, V. Complicated appendicitis—is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting. Am Surg 2007;73:737–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Andersen, B, Kallehave, F, Andersen, H. Antibiotic versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(3):CD001439.Google Scholar
10.Koch, A, Zippel, R, Marusch, F, Schmidt, U, Gastinger, I, Lippert, H. Prospective multicenter study of antibiotic prophylaxis in operative treatment of appendicitis. Dig Surg 2000;17:370–378.Google Scholar