Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:58:01.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvement of Hand Hygiene Quality and Compliance Using Bioburden Measurement and Online Feedback in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2016

Frank Günther*
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
Kai Rudolph
Affiliation:
Corporate Communications, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Uwe Frank
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
Nico T. Mutters
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
*
Address correspondence to Frank Günther, MD, Department of Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany (frank.guenther@med.uni-heidelberg.de).

Abstract

To improve compliance with hand hygiene, a novel method with inclusion of an online reporting system was developed, comprising measurement of total hand bioburden, anonymous online feedback, and onsite training. The intervention significantly improved both compliance and quality of hand hygiene and reduced Staphylococcus aureus incidence.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1–4

Type
Concise Communications
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Luangasanatip, N, Hongsuwan, M, Limmathurotsakul, D, et al. Comparative efficacy of interventions to promote hand hygiene in hospital: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2015;351:h3728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Fuls, JL, Rodgers, ND, Fischler, GE, et al. Alternative hand contamination technique to compare the activities of antimicrobial and nonantimicrobial soaps under different test conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74:37393744.Google Scholar
3. Kuhbeck, F, Engelhardt, S, Sarikas, A. OnlineTED.com—a novel web-based audience response system for higher education: a pilot study to evaluate user acceptance. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2014;31: Doc5.Google Scholar
4. Marra, AR, Sampaio Camargo, TZ, Magnus, TP, et al. The use of real-time feedback via wireless technology to improve hand hygiene compliance. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:608611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Lehotsky, A, Szilagyi, L, Ferenci, T, et al. Quantitative impact of direct, personal feedback on hand hygiene technique. J Hosp Infect 2015;91:8184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Walker, JL, Sistrunk, WW, Higginbotham, MA, et al. Hospital hand hygiene compliance improves with increased monitoring and immediate feedback. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:10741078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Ajao, AO, Harris, AD, Roghmann, M-C, et al. Systematic review of measurement and adjustment for colonization pressure in studies of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and Clostridium difficile acquisition. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:481489.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Günther supplementary material

Günther supplementary material

Download Günther supplementary material(File)
File 352.2 KB