Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Importance of Bacterial Burden Among Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriers in a Long-Term Care Facility

  • Nimalie D. Stone (a1), Donna R. Lewis (a2), H. K. Lowery (a2), Lyndsey A. Darrow (a3), Catherine M. Kroll (a3), Robert P. Gaynes (a4) (a2), John A. Jernigan (a4), John E. McGowan (a3), Fred C. Tenover (a4) and Chesley L. Richards (a4)...

Abstract

Objective.

To evaluate the prevalence and transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization, as well as risk factors associated with MRSA carriage, among residents of a long-term care facility (LTCF).

Design.

Prospective, longitudinal cohort study.

Setting.

A 100-bed Veterans Administration LTCF

Participants.

All current and newly admitted residents of the LTCF during an 8-week study period.

Methods.

Nasal swab samples were obtained weekly and cultured on MRSA-selective media, and the cultures were graded for growth on a semiquantitative scale from 0 (no growth) to 6 (heavy growth). Epidemiologic data for the periods before and during the study were collected to assess risk factors for MRSA carriage.

Results.

Of 83 LTCF residents, 49 (59%) had 1 or more nasal swab cultures that were positive for MRSA; 34 (41%) were consistently culture-negative (designated “noncarriers”). Of the 49 culture-positive residents, 30 (36% of the total of 83 residents) had all cultures positive for MRSA (designated “persistent carriers”), and 19 (23% of the 83 residents) had at least 1 culture, but not all cultures, positive for MRSA (designated “intermittent carriers”). Multivariate analysis showed that participants with at least 1 nasal swab culture positive for MRSA were likely to have had previous hospitalization (odds ratio, 3.9) or wounds (odds ratio, 8.2). Persistent carriers and intermittent carriers did not differ in epidemiologic characteristics but did differ in mean MRSA growth score (3.7 vs 0.7; P < .001).

Conclusions.

Epidemiologic characteristics differed between noncarriers and subjects with at least 1 nasal swab culture positive for MRSA. However, in this LTCF population, only the degree of bacterial colonization (as reflected by mean MRSA growth score) distinguished persistent carriers from intermittent carriers. Understanding the burden of colonization may be important when determining future surveillance and control strategies.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Division of Infectious Diseases, Wesley Woods Health Center, 1841 Clifton Rd., NE Room 527, Atlanta, GA 30329 (nstone@emory.edu)

References

Hide All
1.Wertheim, HFL, Melles, DC, Vos, MC, et al.The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 2005;5:751762.
2.Nouwen, IL, Fieren, MWJA, Snijders, S, Verbrugh, HA, van Belkum, A. Persistent (not intermittent) nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is determinant of CPD-related infections. Kidney Int 2005;67:10841092.
3.Kuehnert, MJ, Kruszon-Moran, D, Hill, HA, et al.Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in the United States, 2001-2002. J Infect Dis 2006;193:172179.
4.Bradley, SF, Terpenning, MS, Ramsey, MA, et al.Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: colonization and infection in a long-term care facility. Ann Int Med 1991;115:417422.
5.Muder, RR, Brennen, C, Wagener, MM, et al.Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal colonization and infection in a long-term care facility. Ann Int Med 1991;114:107112.
6.Bonomo, RA. Multiple antibiotic-resistant bacteria in long-term care facilities: an emerging problem in the practice of infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:14141422.
7.Bradley, SF. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: long-term care concerns. Am J Med 1999;106:2S10S.
8.Vovko, P, Retelij, M, Cretnik, TZ, et al.Risk factors for colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a long-term care facility in Slovenia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:191195.
9.Mendelson, G, Yearmack, Y, Granot, E, Ben-Israel, J, Colodner, R, Raz, R. Staphylococcus aureus carrier state among elderly residents of a long-term care facility. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003;4:125127.
10.O'Sullivan, NP, Keane, CT. Risk factors for colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among nursing home residents. J Hosp Infect 2000;45:206210.
11.Garner, JS. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (published correction appears in Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:214). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:5380
12.Sabat, A, Krzyszton-Russjan, J, Strzalka, W, et al.New method for typing Staphylococcus aureus strains: multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis of polymorphism and genetic relationships of clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:18011804.
13.McDougal, LK, Steward, CD, Killgore, GE, Chaitram, JM, McAllister, SK, Tenover, FC. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:51135120.
14.Rahimi, AR. Prevalence and outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in two nursing centers in Georgia. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:15551557.
15.Trick, WE, Weinstein, RA, DeMarais, PL, et al.Colonization of skilled-care facility residents with antimicrobial resistant pathogens. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:270276.
16.Nouwen, JL, van Belkum, A, Verbrugh, HA. Determinants of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. Neth J Med 2001;59:126133.
17.Peacock, SJ, de Silva, I, Lowy, FD. What determines nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus? Trends Microbiol 2001;9:605610.
18.Tenover, FC, Vaughn, RR, McDougal, LK, Fosheim, GE, McGowan, JE Jr. Multiple locus variable number tandem repeat assay analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45: 22152219.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed