Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention in India: Evaluation of post-prescription review and feedback as a method of promoting optimal antimicrobial use in the intensive care units of a tertiary-care hospital

  • Priscilla Rupali (a1), Prasannakumar Palanikumar (a1), Divyashree Shanthamurthy (a1), John Victor Peter (a2), Subramani Kandasamy (a3), Naveena Gracelin Princy Zacchaeus (a1), Hanna Alexander (a1), Premkumar Thangavelu (a1), Rajiv Karthik (a1), Ooriapadickal Cherian Abraham (a4), Joy Sarojini Michael (a5), Hema Paul (a5), Balaji Veeraraghavan (a5), Binila Chacko (a6), Visalakshi Jeyaseelan (a7), George Alangaden (a8), Tyler Prentiss (a9) and Marcus J Zervos (a10)...

Abstract

Objective:

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are effective in developed countries. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of an infectious disease (ID) physician–driven post-prescription review and feedback as an ASP strategy in India, a low middle-income country (LMIC).

Design and setting:

This prospective cohort study was carried out for 18 months in 2 intensive care units of a tertiary-care hospital, consisting of 3 phases: baseline, intervention, and follow up. Each phase spanned 6 months.

Participants:

Patients aged ≥15 years receiving 48 hours of study antibiotics were recruited for the study.

Methods:

During the intervention phase, an ID physician reviewed the included cases and gave alternate recommendations if the antibiotic use was inappropriate. Acceptance of the recommendations was measured after 48 hours. The primary outcome of the study was days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 study patient days (PD).

Results:

Overall, 401 patients were recruited in the baseline phase, 381 patients were recruited in the intervention phase, and 379 patients were recruited in the follow-up phase. Antimicrobial use decreased from 831.5 during the baseline phase to 717 DOT per 1,000 PD in the intervention phase (P < .0001). The effect was sustained in the follow-up phase (713.6 DOT per 1,000 PD). De-escalation according to culture susceptibility improved significantly in the intervention phase versus the baseline phase (42.7% vs 23.6%; P < .0001). Overall, 73.3% of antibiotic prescriptions were inappropriate. Recommendations by the ID team were accepted in 60.7% of the cases.

Conclusion:

The ID physician–driven implementation of an ASP was successful in reducing antibiotic utilization in an acute-care setting in India.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention in India: Evaluation of post-prescription review and feedback as a method of promoting optimal antimicrobial use in the intensive care units of a tertiary-care hospital
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention in India: Evaluation of post-prescription review and feedback as a method of promoting optimal antimicrobial use in the intensive care units of a tertiary-care hospital
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention in India: Evaluation of post-prescription review and feedback as a method of promoting optimal antimicrobial use in the intensive care units of a tertiary-care hospital
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Marcus J Zervos, Email: mzervos1@hfhs.org

References

Hide All
1.Boeckel, TPV, Gandra, S, Ashok, A, et al. Global antibiotic consumption 2000 to 2010: an analysis of national pharmaceutical sales data. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14:742750.
2.Laxminarayan, R, Matsoso, P, Pant, S, et al. Access to effective antimicrobials: a worldwide challenge. Lancet 2016;387:168175.
3.Summers, AO. Generally overlooked fundamentals of bacterial genetics and ecology. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34 Suppl 3:S85S92.
4.World Health Organization. The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: options for action. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
5.Čižman, M, Srovin, T, Pokorn, M, et al. Analysis of the causes and consequences of decreased antibiotic consumption over the last 5 years in Slovenia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;55:758763.
6.Armstrong, GL, Conn, LA, Pinner, RW. Trends in infectious disease mortality in the United States During the 20th century. JAMA 1999;281:6166.
7.Dellit, TH, Owens, RC, McGowan, JE, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Programme to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:159177.
8.Hecker, MT, Aron, DC, Patel, NP, Lehmann, MK, Donskey, CJ. Unnecessary use of antimicrobials in hospitalized patients: current patterns of misuse with an emphasis on the antianaerobic spectrum of activity. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:972978.
9.Arnold, FW, McDonald, LC, Smith, RS, Newman, D, Ramirez, JA. Improving antimicrobial use in the hospital setting by providing usage feedback to prescribing physicians. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:378382.
10.Chang, Y-Y, Chen, H-P, Lin, C-W, et al. Implementation and outcomes of an antimicrobial stewardship program: effectiveness of education. J Chin Med Assoc 2017;80:353359.
11.Karanika, S, Paudel, S, Grigoras, C, Kalbasi, A, Mylonakis, E. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and economic outcomes from the implementation of hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016;60:48404852.
12.Morrill, HJ, Caffrey, AR, Gaitanis, MM, LaPlante, KL. Impact of a prospective audit and feedback antimicrobial stewardship program at a Veterans Affairs medical center: a six-point assessment. PLoS One 2016;11(3):e0150795.
13.Morton, J, Curzake, D, Parente, D, Morrill, H, Gaitanis, M, Laplante, K. Antimicrobial stewardship intervention acceptance: impact of verbal and nonverbal communication. Open Forum Infect Dis 2015;2 Suppl 1:1402.
14.Chung, GW, Wu, JE, Yeo, CL, Chan, D, Hsu, LY. Antimicrobial stewardship: a review of prospective audit and feedback systems and an objective evaluation of outcomes. Virulence 2013;4:151157.
15.Lesprit, P, de Pontfarcy, A, Esposito-Farese, M, et al. Postprescription review improves in-hospital antibiotic use: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;21:180.e1180.e7.
16.Tamma, PD, Avdic, E, Keenan, JF, et al. What is the more effective antibiotic stewardship intervention: pre-prescription authorization or post-prescription review with feedback? Clin Infect Dis 2017;64:537543.
17.Okumura, LM, da Silva, MMG, Veroneze, I. Effects of a bundled antimicrobial stewardship program on mortality: a cohort study. Braz J Infect Dis 2015;19:246252.
18.Brink, AJ, Messina, AP, Feldman, C, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship across 47 South African hospitals: an implementation study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:10171025.
19.Baur, D, Gladstone, BP, Burkert, F, et al. Effect of antibiotic stewardship on the incidence of infection and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2017;17:9901001.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention in India: Evaluation of post-prescription review and feedback as a method of promoting optimal antimicrobial use in the intensive care units of a tertiary-care hospital

  • Priscilla Rupali (a1), Prasannakumar Palanikumar (a1), Divyashree Shanthamurthy (a1), John Victor Peter (a2), Subramani Kandasamy (a3), Naveena Gracelin Princy Zacchaeus (a1), Hanna Alexander (a1), Premkumar Thangavelu (a1), Rajiv Karthik (a1), Ooriapadickal Cherian Abraham (a4), Joy Sarojini Michael (a5), Hema Paul (a5), Balaji Veeraraghavan (a5), Binila Chacko (a6), Visalakshi Jeyaseelan (a7), George Alangaden (a8), Tyler Prentiss (a9) and Marcus J Zervos (a10)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.