Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Impact of Adenosine Triphosphate Detection and Feedback on Hospital Room Cleaning

  • Philip W. Smith (a1) (a2), Elizabeth Beam (a3), Harlan Sayles (a2), Mark E. Rupp (a1), R. Jennifer Cavalieri (a1), Shawn Gibbs (a2) and Angela Hewlett (a1) (a2)...

Abstract

Objective.

To assess the effect of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) device measurement of hospital room cleaning and feedback of pooled results to environmental service workers (EVS) to improve cleaning efficacy.

Design.

Nonrandomized controlled trial conducted over 20 months.

Setting.

Three hospitals of varying size.

Participants.

EVS workers, randomly selected on the basis of convenience sample of rooms.

Interventions.

Environmental cleanliness composite scores were combined with layered educational interventions and used to provide feedback to EVS workers on specific hospital units. Trends in cleaning efficacy were observed after the interventions.

Results.

Cleaning efficacy improved significantly with each intervention (P < .01) and decreased during the washout period.

Conclusions.

The ATP detection device combined with educational feedback for EVS workers resulted in significant improvement in cleaning efficacy of the hospital room environment.

Copyright

Corresponding author

College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985400 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198 (pwsmith@unmc.edu)

References

Hide All
1. Guh, A, Carling, P; Environmental Evaluation Workgroup. Options for evaluating environmental cleaning, http://www.cdc.gov/hai/toolkits/evaluating-environmental-cleaning.html. Updated 2010. Accessed October 1, 2013.
2. Otter, JA, Yezli, S, Salkeld, JA, French, GL. Evidence that contaminated surfaces contribute to the transmission of hospital pathogens and an overview of strategies to address contaminated surfaces in hospital settings. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:S6S11.
3. Huang, SS, Datta, R, Platt, R. Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:19451951.
4. Carling, PC, Parry, MF, Von Beheren, SM; Healthcare Environmental Hygiene Study Group. Identifying opportunities to enhance environmental cleaning in 23 acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:17.
5. Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Lipka, A, Havill, H, Rizvani, R. Variations in hospital daily cleaning practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:99101.
6. Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Havill, HL, Mangione, E, Dumigan, DG, Moore, BA. Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:11871193.
7. Smith, P, Sayles, H, Hewlett, AL, Cavalieri, R, Gibbs, S, Rupp, M. A study of three methods for assessment of hospital environmental cleaning. Healthcare Infect 2013;18:8085.
8. Sherlock, O, O'Connell, N, Creamer, E, Humphreys, H. Is it really clean? an evaluation of the efficacy of four methods for determining hospital cleanliness. J Hosp Infect 2009;72:140146.
9. Carling, PC, Parry, MM, Rupp, ME, et al. Improving cleaning of the environment surrounding patients in 36 acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:10351041.
10. Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Dumigan, DG, Golebiewski, M, Balogun, O, Rizvani, R. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:678684.
11. Smith, PW, Gibbs, S, Sayles, H, Hewlett, A, Rupp, ME, Iwen, PC. Observations on hospital room contamination testing. Healthcare Infection 2013;18:1013.
12. Huslage, K, Rutala, WA, Sickbert-Bennett, E, Weber, DJ. A quantitative approach to defining “high-touch” surfaces in hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:850853.
13. Horan, TC, Andrus, M, Dudeck, MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309332.
14. Dumigan, DG, Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Golebiewski, M, Balogun, O, Rizvani, R. Who is really caring for your environment of care? developing standardized cleaning procedures and effective monitoring techniques. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:387392.
15. Boyce, JM, Havill, NL, Dumigan, DG, Golbiewski, M, Balogun, O, Rizvani, R. Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices using an ATP bioluminescence assay. Paper presented at: Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Annual Scientific Meeting; April 5-8, 2008; Orlando, Florida (Poster 276).
16. Matlow, AG, Wray, R, Richardson, SE. Attitudes and beliefs, not just knowledge, influence the effectiveness of environmental cleaning by environmental service workers. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:260262.
17. Rebmann, T, Aureden, K; Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology. Preventing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in long-term care facilities: an executive summary of the APIC Elimination Guide. Am J Infect Control 2011;39:235238.
18. Havill, NL. Best practices in disinfection of noncritical surfaces in the health care setting: creating a bundle for success. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:S26S30.
19. Aziz, A. Can education and training for domestic staff increase awareness of infection control practices and improve cleanliness within hospitals? J Infect Preven 2009;10:171177.
20. Guerrero, DM, Carling, PC, Jury, LA, Ponnada, S, Nerandzic, MM, Donskey, CJ. Beyond the Hawthorne effect: reduction of Clostridium difficile environmental contamination through active intervention to improve cleaning practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:524526.
21. Pauli, P. Using games to demonstrate competency. I Nurses Staff Dev 2005;21:272276.
22. Whiteley, GS, Derry, C, Glasbey, T. Reliability testing for portable adenosine triphosphate bioluminometers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:538540.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed