Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Hand Rub Consumption Has Almost Doubled in 132 German Hospitals Over 9 Years

  • Wibke Wetzker (a1), Janine Walter (a1), Karin Bunte-Schönberger (a1), Frank Schwab (a1), Michael Behnke (a1), Petra Gastmeier (a1) and Christiane Reichardt (a1)...

Abstract

Annual surveillance data (2007–2015), collected continuously in 132 German hospitals, was evaluated for development of alcohol-based hand-rub consumption (AHC) as a surrogate parameter for hand hygiene adherence. Overall, the median increase in AHC was 94%. The increases over 9 years were significant in all units and quartiles of AHC at baseline.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:870–872

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence to Wibke Wetzker, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Hindenburgdamm 27, D-12203 Berlin, Germany (wibke.wetzker@charite.de).

References

Hide All
1. Erasmus, V, Daha, TJ, Brug, H, et al. Systematic review of studies on compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:283294.
2. Behnke, M, Gastmeier, P, Geffers, C, Monch, N, Reichardt, C. Establishment of a national surveillance system for alcohol-based hand rub consumption and change in consumption over 4 years. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:618620.
3. Protocol. Surveillance of alcohol hand rub use in hospitals. HAND-KISS-S, HAND-KISS-F. National Reference Center for Nosocomial Infection Surveillance at the Institute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine Charité – University Medicine Berlin 2012. KISS website. http://www.nrz-hygiene.de/fileadmin/nrz/module/hand/HAND-KISS_protocol_S_F_april_2012.pdf. Published 2012. Accessed February 25, 2017.
4. Rosenthal, VD, Pawar, M, Leblebicioglu, H, et al. Impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) multidimensional hand hygiene approach over 13 years in 51 cities of 19 limited-resource countries from Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, and Europe. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:415423.
5. Wetzker, W, Bunte-Schonberger, K, Walter, J, Pilarski, G, Gastmeier, P, Reichardt, C. Compliance with hand hygiene: reference data from the national hand hygiene campaign in Germany. J Hosp Infect 2016;92:328331.
6. Korhonen, A, Ojanpera, H, Puhto, T, Jarvinen, R, Kejonen, P, Holopainen, A. Adherence to hand hygiene guidelines—significance of measuring fidelity. J Clin Nurs 2015;24:31973205.
7. Tschudin-Sutter, S, Sepulcri, D, Dangel, M, Schuhmacher, H, Widmer, AF. Compliance with the World Health Organization hand hygiene technique: a prospective observational study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:482483.
8. Morgan, DJ, Pineles, L, Shardell, M, et al. Automated hand hygiene count devices may better measure compliance than human observation. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:955959.
9. Magnus, TP, Marra, AR, Camargo, TZ, et al. Measuring hand hygiene compliance rates in different special care settings: a comparative study of methodologies. Int J Infect Dis 2015;33:205208.
10. Haubitz, S, Atkinson, A, Kaspar, T, et al. Handrub consumption mirrors hand hygiene compliance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:707710.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed